scholarly journals Prevention of venous thromboembolism in gynecological cancer patients undergoing major abdominopelvic surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Putsarat Insin ◽  
Kasidin Vitoopinyoparb ◽  
Kunlawat Thadanipon ◽  
Chuenkamon Charakorn ◽  
John Attia ◽  
...  
Haematologica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 1277-1287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frits I. Mulder ◽  
Matteo Candeloro ◽  
Pieter W. Kamphuisen ◽  
Marcello Di Nisio ◽  
Patrick M. Bossuyt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3692
Author(s):  
Fumihiko Urabe ◽  
Shoji Kimura ◽  
Kosuke Iwatani ◽  
Keiji Yasue ◽  
Yuhei Koike ◽  
...  

The impact of ABO blood type in the development of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients remains controversial. To develop a sense of the current opinion in this area, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. In March 2021, we performed a systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane library, and Scopus for studies that compared cancer patients who had a blood type of either O or non-O (A, B, and AB). Our objective was to use multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine how ABO blood type was associated with the development of venous thromboembolism. Our selection criteria were met by a total of nine studies in 25,884 patients for the systematic review and five studies in 22,777 patients for the meta-analysis. In cancer patients, we found that non-O blood type was associated with a nearly two-fold increase in risk of venous thromboembolism (pooled OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.44–2.10). Additionally, among the eligible patients, 21,889 patients were post-operative urological cancer patients. In these patients, the analysis also showed an association between non-O blood type and increasing risk of venous thromboembolism after pelvic surgery for malignancy (pooled OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.36–2.20). Our meta-analysis suggested that non-O blood type is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism among patients with cancer. As blood type is routinely determined preoperatively by objective and standardized methods, we anticipate that our results will be useful for managing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients, especially after pelvic surgery for urological cancers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 2253-2273
Author(s):  
Meng Jiang ◽  
Chang‐Li Li ◽  
Chun‐Qiu Pan ◽  
Xin‐Wu Cui ◽  
Christoph F. Dietrich

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4603
Author(s):  
Michael Saerens ◽  
Emiel A. De Jaeghere ◽  
Heini Kanervo ◽  
Nele Vandemaele ◽  
Hannelore Denys ◽  
...  

Thromboembolic events are the second cause of death in cancer patients. In ovarian cancer, 3–10% of patients present with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the incidence may rise to 36% along the disease course. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial-derived growth factor, and in in vitro studies it showed a predisposition to hemostasis perturbation, including thrombosis. However, in vivo and clinical studies have shown conflicting results for its use as a treatment for ovarian cancer, so we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk of arterial thromboembolism (ATE) and VTE in ovarian cancer patients treated with bevacizumab. The review comprised 14 trials with 6221 patients: ATE incidence was reported in 5 (4811 patients) where the absolute risk was 2.4% with bevacizumab vs. 1.1% without (RR 2.45; 95% CI 1.27–4.27, p = 0.008). VTE incidence was reported in 9 trials (5121 patients) where the absolute risk was 5.4% with bevacizumab vs. 3.7% without (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.02–1.79, p = 0.04). Our analysis showed that the risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism increased in patients treated with bevacizumab. Thrombolic events (TEs) are probably underreported, and studies should discriminate between ATE and VTE. Bevacizumab can be considered as an additional risk factor when selecting patients for primary prophylaxis with anticoagulants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document