Population-level trends and outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer surgery in the United States

Author(s):  
Laurie L. Brunette ◽  
Varun U. Khetan ◽  
Rasika R. Deshpande ◽  
David J. Nusbaum ◽  
Maximilian Klar ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Novackova ◽  
Michael J. Halaska ◽  
Helena Robova ◽  
Ivana Mala ◽  
Marek Pluta ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to prospectively monitor the patients’ quality of life (QoL) after vulvar cancer surgery.DesignThe design was prospective clinical study.SettingThe study was set in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2nd Medical Faculty of the Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.MethodsA group of 36 patients underwent vulvar cancer surgery: 24 patients were subject to inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (RAD) and 12 to sentinel lymph node biopsy. To evaluate QoL, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, QoL questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CX24) were administered to patients before and 6 and 12 months after surgery.ResultsIn patients with vulvar cancer after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, increased fatigue and impaired lymphedema were observed. In the group of patients after sentinel lymph node biopsy, none of the QoL variables worsened postoperatively. Comparing both groups 12 months after surgery, the RAD group had significantly worse outcomes in body image and cognitive functioning than the sentinel lymph node biopsy group.Patients in the RAD group, who received adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 13), had worse QoL in symptom experience (P < 0.05) at 6 and 12 months after the surgery than patients without radiotherapy (n = 11).ConclusionsLess radical surgery showed objectively better QoL results.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1480-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Britt K. Erickson ◽  
Laura M. Divine ◽  
Charles A. Leath ◽  
J. Michael Straughn

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the costs and outcomes of inguinal-femoral lymph node dissection (IF-LND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for the management of early-stage vulvar cancer.MethodsA cost-effectiveness model compared 2 different strategies for the management of early-stage vulvar cancer: (1) vulvectomy and SLNB and (2) vulvectomy and IF-LND. Probabilities of inguinal-femoral node metastases and recurrence rates associated with each strategy were estimated from published data. Actual payer costs of surgery and radiation therapy were obtained using 2012 CPT codes and Medicare payment information. Rates and costs of postoperative complications including lymphedema, lymphocyst formation, and infection were estimated and included in a separate model. Cost-effectiveness ratios were determined for each strategy. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate pertinent uncertainties in the models.ResultsFor the estimated 3000 women diagnosed annually with early-stage vulvar cancer in the United States, the annual cost of the SLNB strategy is $65.2 million compared with $76.8 million for the IF-LND strategy. Three-year inguinal-femoral recurrence-free survival was similar between groups (96.9% vs 97.3%). This translates into a lower cost-effectiveness ratio for the SLNB strategy ($22,416), compared with the IF-LND strategy ($26,344). When adding complication costs to the model, cost-effectiveness ratios further favor the SLNB strategy ($23,711 vs $31,198). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the SLNB strategy remained cost-effective until the recurrence rate after a negative sentinel lymph node approaches 9%.ConclusionsSentinel lymph node biopsy is the most cost-effective strategy for the management of patients with early-stage vulvar cancer due to lower treatment costs and lower costs due to complications.


2014 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katina Robison ◽  
Dario Roque ◽  
Carolyn McCourt ◽  
Ashley Stuckey ◽  
Paul A. DiSilvestro ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document