Gastric remnant carcinoma: Just another proximal gastric cancer or a unique entity?

1997 ◽  
Vol 173 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliot Newman ◽  
Murray F. Brennan ◽  
Steven N. Hochwald ◽  
Lawrence E. Harrison ◽  
Martin S. Karpeh
2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 877-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thuy B. Tran ◽  
Ioannis Hatzaras ◽  
David J. Worhunsky ◽  
Gerardo A. Vitiello ◽  
Malcolm Hart Squires ◽  
...  

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo-meng Xiao ◽  
Ping Zhao ◽  
Zhi Ding ◽  
Rui Xu ◽  
Chao Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (DTR) has been used for upper third gastric cancer as a function-preserving procedure. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) with DTR remain uncertain. This study compared open proximal gastrectomy (OPG) with DTR and LPG with DTR for proximal gastric cancer. Methods Sixty-four patients who had undergone OPG with DTR and forty-six patients who had undergone LPG with DTR were enrolled in this case–control study. The clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes and postoperative nutrition index were analysed retrospectively. Results The operation time was significantly longer in the LGP group than in the OPG group (258.3 min vs 205.8 min; p = 0.00). However, the time to first flatus and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the LPG group [4.0 days vs 3.5 days (p = 0.00) and 10.6 days vs 9.2 days (p = 0.001), respectively]. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, complications or reflux oesophagitis. The nutrition status was assessed using the haemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin and weight levels from pre-operation to six months after surgery. No significant difference was found between the groups. Conclusion LPG with DTR can be safely performed for proximal gastric cancer patients by experienced surgeons.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Ken Yuu ◽  
Hiroshi Kawashima ◽  
Sho Toyoda ◽  
Satoshi Okumura ◽  
Kansuke Yamamoto ◽  
...  

An 80-year-old man who had undergone distal gastrectomy and Billroth-II gastrojejunostomy 38 years previously, for a benign gastric ulcer, was diagnosed with remnant gastric cancer based on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings. He presented at our emergency department with acute-onset epigastric pain due to perforated remnant gastric cancer. Conservative medical management was selected, including nasogastric tube insertion, antibiotics, and proton pump inhibitors, because his peritonitis was limited to his epigastrium and his general condition was stable. Twenty-one days after the perforation occurred, curative total remnant gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy were performed. Adhesion between the lateral segment of the liver and the dissected lesser curvature of the gastric remnant may have contributed to the peritonitis in this case, which was limited to the epigastrium. This is the first report of perforated remnant gastric cancer in which conservative treatment was effective prior to curative resection. The protocol reported here may be of use to other clinicians who may encounter this clinical entity in their practices.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 853-862
Author(s):  
Qi-Yue Chen ◽  
Zhi-Liang Hong ◽  
Qing Zhong ◽  
Zhi-Yu Liu ◽  
Chao-Hui Zheng ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document