scholarly journals Su1985 Unique Clinicopathologic Features of Early Proximal Gastric Cancer Diagnosed With Who Criteria: Implications for Endoscopic Resection

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiong Shi ◽  
Qi Sun ◽  
Huiping Yu ◽  
YiFen Zhang ◽  
Cheng Fang ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 3673-3683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan-Sheng Meng ◽  
Zhao-Hong Zhang ◽  
Ya-Mei Wang ◽  
Lin Lu ◽  
Jin-Zhou Zhu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 563-579
Author(s):  
Ga Hee Kim ◽  
Hwoon-Yong Jung

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo-meng Xiao ◽  
Ping Zhao ◽  
Zhi Ding ◽  
Rui Xu ◽  
Chao Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (DTR) has been used for upper third gastric cancer as a function-preserving procedure. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) with DTR remain uncertain. This study compared open proximal gastrectomy (OPG) with DTR and LPG with DTR for proximal gastric cancer. Methods Sixty-four patients who had undergone OPG with DTR and forty-six patients who had undergone LPG with DTR were enrolled in this case–control study. The clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes and postoperative nutrition index were analysed retrospectively. Results The operation time was significantly longer in the LGP group than in the OPG group (258.3 min vs 205.8 min; p = 0.00). However, the time to first flatus and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the LPG group [4.0 days vs 3.5 days (p = 0.00) and 10.6 days vs 9.2 days (p = 0.001), respectively]. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, complications or reflux oesophagitis. The nutrition status was assessed using the haemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin and weight levels from pre-operation to six months after surgery. No significant difference was found between the groups. Conclusion LPG with DTR can be safely performed for proximal gastric cancer patients by experienced surgeons.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Yi Zhou ◽  
Jie Sun ◽  
Qing Guo ◽  
Hai-Bin Zhao ◽  
Zhi-Hua Zhou

Abstract Background Certain gastric cancers exhibit some primitive phenotypes, which may indicate a high malignancy. In histologically differentiated early gastric cancer (EGC), the presence and the clinicopathological significance of the primitive phenotype remain unclear. Methods Using immunohistochemical staining we detected the expression of three primitive phenotypic markers SALL4, Glypican-3(GPC3), and AFP in whole tissue sections of differentiated EGC (gastrectomy specimens, n = 302). For those cases with primitive phenotypes, we analyzed their clinicopathological features and evaluated whether the criteria for endoscopic resection were met. Results We found that 9.3% (28/302) of all differentiated EGC cases have primitive phenotypes, and most of these cases (25/28) exhibit a histomorphology similar to conventional differentiated EGC. Patients with primitive phenotypes had a deeper invasion, a higher rate of ulcer and lymphatic invasion than cases without primitive phenotype. Moreover, patients with primitive phenotypes displayed a significantly higher frequency of LNM than those without (57.1% vs 8.8%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that presence of primitive phenotypes was an independent risk factor for LNM (P = 0.001, HR 6.977, 95% CI: 2.199–22.138). Interestingly, we found 2 cases with primitive phenotypes developed LNM, and they both met the expanded indications of endoscopic resection for differentiated EGC. Conclusions A small number of differentiated EGC have primitive phenotypes, which were closely related to LNM and were an independent risk factor for LNM. Given its highly aggressive behavior, differentiated EGC with primitive phenotypes should be evaluated with stricter criteria before endoscopic resection, or considered to give an additional surgical operation after endoscopic resection.


Author(s):  
Su Jin Kim ◽  
Cheol Woong Choi ◽  
Dae Hwan Kang ◽  
Hyung Wook Kim ◽  
Su Bum Park

Surgery Today ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1031-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoru Ishii ◽  
Keishi Yamashita ◽  
Hiroshi Kato ◽  
Nobuyuki Nishizawa ◽  
Hideki Ushiku ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document