Sa1778 - Number Needed to Treat to Achieve Clinical Response at Week 8 Along with Response or Remission at Week 52 with Ustekinumab Treatment vs Placebo from the Phase 3 Uniti Crohn's Disease Studies, by Population

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subrata Ghosh ◽  
Christopher Gasink ◽  
Long-Long Gao ◽  
Camilo Obando
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S020-S021
Author(s):  
S Vermeire ◽  
W Sandborn ◽  
F Baert ◽  
S Danese ◽  
T Kobayashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective, humanised, monoclonal α 4β 7 integrin antibody for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD). VDZ is currently an intravenous (IV) therapy; a subcutaneous (SC) formulation is under development to provide patients with an alternative route of administration for maintenance treatment for UC and CD. Here we present the first data from the phase 3 study of VDZ SC maintenance treatment in CD. Methods VISIBLE 2 (NCT02611817; EudraCT 2015-000481-58) was a randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 trial of VDZ SC as maintenance treatment in adults with moderately to severely active CD. Patients (n = 644) received open-label VDZ 300mg IV induction therapy at Weeks 0 and 2. At Week 6, clinical responders (defined as patients with a ≥70-point decrease in CD Activity Index [CDAI] from baseline) were randomly assigned to receive vedolizumab SC (108 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W]), or placebo (Q2W) for up to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical remission at Week 52 (defined as CDAI score ≤150). Rank-ordered secondary endpoints were enhanced clinical response at Week 52 (a drop of ≥100 in CDAI score), corticosteroid (CS)-free clinical remission at Week 52, and clinical remission at Week 52 in anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-naïve patients. Finally, VDZ immunogenicity and predefined adverse events of special interest were assessed. Results Patients who responded to VDZ IV induction at Week 6 (n = 409) were randomised to VDZ SC (n = 275) or PBO (n = 134) maintenance and received at least 1 dose of study drug; 61% and 53%, respectively, were previously exposed to anti-TNF therapy. At Week 52, 48.0% of patients on VDZ SC vs. 34.3% on PBO were in clinical remission (p = 0.008, Figure). Enhanced clinical response at Week 52 was reached by 52.0% vs. 44.8% of patients on VDZ SC vs. PBO, respectively (p = 0.167). Among patients on concomitant CS at baseline (VDZ SC, n = 95; PBO, n = 44), 45.3% receiving VDZ SC vs. 18.2% receiving PBO achieved CS-free clinical remission at Week 52. Of anti-TNF-naïve patients (VDZ SC, n = 107; PBO, n = 63), 48.6% vs. 42.9% were in clinical remission at Week 52 in the VDZ SC and PBO arms, respectively. Injection-site reactions were reported for <3% of patients treated with VDZ SC. Serious infections, malignancy, and liver injury were ≤5% for both arms. Anti-VDZ antibodies were detected in 7 (2.5%) patients treated with VDZ SC arm; 4 of 7 patients developed neutralising antibodies. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion Among VDZ IV induction responders, significantly more patients on maintenance VDZ SC than PBO achieved clinical remission at Week 52. The safety findings with VDZ SC remain in line with the known safety profile of VDZ IV in patients with CD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S6-S6
Author(s):  
Joshua Patterson

Abstract Crohn’s Disease (CD) is an Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) whose etiology has been suspected to include bacterial antigens. A treatment option, therefore, would be the usage of antibiotics. To that end, the purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis on the ability of antibiotics inducing remission or a favorable clinical response in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. Thirty-two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of antibiotics for treatment of CD in adults, totaling 3269 patients, were reviewed. Log-odds ratio and probability difference were performed to estimate risk difference. The Number Needed to Treat (NNT) was also calculated for each antibiotic reviewed (rifaximin, metronidazole, clarithromycin, and ciprofloxacin). The analysis revealed that antibiotics greatly improved patients’ Crohn’s disease activity, with a total response (defined as clinical response plus remission) odds ratio of 0.715 (95% CI: 0.6319–0.7971), a clinical response odds-ratio of 0.7478 (95% CI: 0.6214–0.8715), and a remission odds-ratio of 0.6877 (95% CI: 0.5768–0.7987). The Number Needed to Treat for each of the antibiotics used in the clinical trials were 5.018 (Ciprofloxacin), 6.480 (Clarithromycin), 7.556 (Metronidazole), and 6.824 (Rifaximin). This is an important outcome because it not only opens up a new treatment option for those suffering from Crohn’s Disease but it also leads credibility to the theory that Crohn’s is caused, at least in part, by bacteria, such as Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis and adherent invasive E. coli.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document