Sa1153 RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN GASTROENTEROPANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR TREATMENT AND SURVIVAL IN THE UNITED STATES

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-292
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Kessel ◽  
Monica Naparst ◽  
Naomi Alpert ◽  
Eugene Ahn ◽  
Edward M. Wolin ◽  
...  
Pancreas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Kessel ◽  
Monica Naparst ◽  
Naomi Alpert ◽  
Kelly Diaz ◽  
Eugene Ahn ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 793-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Wang ◽  
Yawei Zhang ◽  
Shuangge Ma

1992 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 696-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard K. Vedder ◽  
Lowell Gallaway

2021 ◽  
pp. 153568412110547
Author(s):  
Zawadi Rucks-Ahidiana

Academics largely define gentrification based on changes in the class demographics of neighborhood residents from predominately low-income to middle-class. This ignores that gentrification always occurs in spaces defined by both class and race. In this article, I use the lens of racial capitalism to theorize gentrification as a racialized, profit-accumulating process, integrating the perspective that spaces are always racialized to class-centered theories. Using the prior literature on gentrification in the United States, I demonstrate how the concepts of value, valuation, and devaluation from racial capitalism explain where and how gentrification unfolds. Exposure to gentrification varies depending on a neighborhood’s racial composition and the gentrification stakeholders involved, which contributes to racial differences in the scale and pace of change and the implications of those changes for the processes of displacement. Revising our understanding of gentrification to address the racialization of space helps resolve seemingly contradictory findings across qualitative and quantitative studies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 80 (06) ◽  
pp. 555-561
Author(s):  
C. Lane Anzalone ◽  
Amy E. Glasgow ◽  
Jamie J. Van Gompel ◽  
Matthew L. Carlson

Objective/Hypothesis The aim of the study was to determine the impact of race on disease presentation and treatment of intracranial meningioma in the United States. Study Design This study comprised of the analysis of a national population-based tumor registry. Methods Analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database was performed, including all patients identified with a diagnosis of intracranial meningioma. Associations between race, disease presentation, treatment strategy, and overall survival were analyzed in a univariate and multivariable model. Results A total of 65,973 patients with intracranial meningiomas were identified. Of these, 45,251 (68.6%) claimed white, 7,796 (12%) black, 7,154 (11%) Hispanic, 4,902 (7%) Asian, and 870 (1%) patients reported “other-unspecified” or “other-unknown.” The median annual incidence of disease was lowest among black (3.43 per 100,000 persons) and highest among white (9.52 per 100,000 persons) populations (p < 0.001). Overall, Hispanic patients were diagnosed at the youngest age and white patients were diagnosed at the oldest age (mean of 59 vs. 66 years, respectively; p < 0.001). Compared with white populations, black, Hispanic, and Asian populations were more likely to present with larger tumors (p < 0.001). After controlling for tumor size, age, and treatment center in a multivariable model, Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo surgery than white, black, and Asian populations. Black populations had the poorest disease specific and overall survival rates at 5 years following surgery compared with other groups. Conclusion Racial differences among patients with intracranial meningioma exist within the United States. Understanding these differences are of vital importance toward identifying potential differences in the biological basis of disease or alternatively inequalities in healthcare delivery or access Further studies are required to determine which factors drive differences in tumor size, age, annual disease incidence, and overall survival between races.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 2084-2092
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Varga ◽  
Julia Butt ◽  
William J. Blot ◽  
Loïc Le Marchand ◽  
Christopher A. Haiman ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (5) ◽  
pp. 1961-1965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Walsh ◽  
Benjamin J. Davies ◽  
Mary S. Croughan ◽  
Peter R. Carroll ◽  
Paul J. Turek

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. S205-S206
Author(s):  
Siddesh Besur ◽  
Siva Talluri ◽  
Vamsi Korrapati ◽  
Jyothsna Talluri

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76
Author(s):  
Christian Mpody ◽  
Lisa Humphrey ◽  
Stephani Kim ◽  
Joseph D. Tobias ◽  
Olubukola O. Nafiu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document