scholarly journals Effects of muscarinic cholinergic antagonists on locomotor activity produced by methamphetamine and cocaine in mice

1998 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
K. Shimosato ◽  
S. Kitayama ◽  
M. Katsura ◽  
T. Dohi ◽  
S. Ohkuma
1980 ◽  
Vol 239 (3) ◽  
pp. G204-G209
Author(s):  
R. Ecknauer ◽  
W. J. Thompson ◽  
L. R. Johnson ◽  
G. C. Rosenfeld

The tritiated muscarinic cholinergic antagonist quinuclidinyl benzilate, [3H]QNB, was used as a direct probe for the detection and characterization of muscarinic cholinergic receptors associated with the particulate fraction of isolated and purified rat gastric muscosal parietal cells. Specific binding is saturable (Bmax = 55 fmol/mg protein, KD = 0.78 nM), shows a single population of binding sites, and has appropriate pharmacological specificity. Nanomolar concentrations of muscarinic cholinergic antagonists, such as atropine and scopolamine, inhibit [3H]QNB binding by 50%, whereas micromolar concentrations are needed for agonists, such as acetylcholine, oxotremorine, and carbamylcholine. Binding is also stereoselective as shown by the more than 1,000-fold difference in inhibitory potencies of the stereoisomers of benzetimide. Noncholinergic agents, including pentagastrin, histamine, and the H2-receptor antagonists cimetidine and metiamide, have little or no effect on [3H]QNB binding at concentrations of 100 microM. These data support the existence of specific parietal cell muscarinic cholinergic receptors with which the secretagogue acetylcholine may directly interact to initiate gastric acid secretion.


1998 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
AE Rigamonti ◽  
N Marazzi ◽  
SG Cella ◽  
L Cattaneo ◽  
EE Muller

Using unanesthetized young male and female beagle dogs, before and after a 2-day fast, we studied the effect of an i.v. infusion of 0.9% saline (5 ml/h), somatostatin (SS, 4 or 8 micrograms/kg/h), or pretreatment with pirenzepine (PZ, 0.6 mg/kg i.v.), a muscarinic cholinergic antagonist which allegedly releases SS, on the GH release evoked by acute administration of GHRH (2 micrograms/kg i.v.), hexarelin (HEXA), a member of the GH-releasing peptide family (250 micrograms/kg i.v.) or GHRH plus HEXA. In fasted dogs, GHRH delivered during saline infusion induced a clear-cut rise in plasma GH levels, significantly higher than that which it induced in fed dogs. In contrast, HEXA, although very effective in causing the release of GH, only slightly increased GH secretion in fasted dogs over that which it induced in fed dogs. Co-administration of GHRH plus HEXA into fed dogs induced a synergic GH response that further increased with fasting. The action of GHRH in fed dogs was abolished by the lower dose of SS, whereas SS at either dose was ineffective in suppressing the GH-releasing effect during fasting. Infusion of the lower dose of SS failed to counter the action of HEXA, either before or during fasting, whilst the higher SS dose partially reduced it in both conditions. In contrast to SS, PZ reduced the GH-releasing effect of GHRH and HEXA, both in the fed state and, though to a lesser extent, during fasting. Pirenzepine only slightly reduced the robust GH rise elicited by GHRH plus HEXA in fed dogs. The suppressive effect of PZ on the GH response to combined administration of the peptides was lowest in fasted dogs. These data show that: (1) fasting augmented the GH response to GHRH and (to a lesser degree) to HEXA; (2) SS inhibited the GH response to GHRH in the fed state, but not in the fasted state; (3) only the higher dose of SS partially reduced the GH stimulation by HEXA in either the fed or the fasted state; (4) PZ lowered the GH response to GHRH and to HEXA in both the fed and (to a lesser degree) the fasted state; (5) PZ did not modify the GH release due to the combined administration of GHRH and HEXA. It is suggested that: (1) during fasting the greatly enhanced GH response to GHRH alone or GHRH plus HEXA probably reflects an augmented GHRH secretion; (2) somatotrope refractoriness to SS may contribute to the enhanced GH secretion in states of calorie deprivation; (3) in contrast to a general belief, muscarinic cholinergic antagonists, e.g. PZ, do not act exclusively via release of SS, but probably also through inhibition of GHRH function.


1976 ◽  
Vol 160 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
S S Jafferji ◽  
R H Michell

Incubation of fragments of guinea-pig ileum smooth muscle in the presence of an elevated extracellular K+ concentration, which causes an increase in cell-surface Ca2+ permeability and thus leads to contraction, caused a marked increase in phosphatidylinositol turnover, as assessed by incorporation of 32Pi. This response was not diminished by atropine or propylbenzilycholine mustard, two muscarinic cholinergic antagonists, and was therefore not caused by the release of endogenous acetylcholine within the tissue. In contrast, exposure of guinea-pig pancreas fragments to high extracellular [K+], which does not increase cell-surface Ca2+ permeability or evoke secretion, did not cause an increase in phosphatidylinositol turnover, even though such an increase was triggered by carbamoylcholine, which is a secretagogue. These observations are consistent with a suggested function for phosphatidylinositol breakdown in the mechanisms of cell-surface Ca2+ gates.


1991 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 1442-1451 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Katz ◽  
R. M. Harris-Warrick

1. The gastropyloric receptor (GPR) cells are stretch-sensitive muscle receptors in the crab stomatogastric nervous system that use both 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) and acetylcholine as cotransmitters. Brief stimulation of these afferent neurons causes two gastric mill neurons to be recruited into the pyloric motor pattern. 2. The GPR cells evoke complex synaptic potentials in the lateral gastric (LG) and medial gastric (MG) motor neurons, two component neurons of the gastric mill central pattern generator. When the gastric mill is quiescent (as often happens in vivo), GPR stimulation transiently inhibits LG and MG. After this transient inhibition, these cells undergo a prolonged excitation during which they fire bursts of action potentials at a constant phase relation to the pyloric motor pattern. 3. To determine the causes for this effect, we examined the effects of GPR stimulation on these two cells and on the inferior cardiac motor neuron, which is electrically coupled to them. When GPR is stimulated, all three cells receive rapid biphasic synaptic potentials that are blocked by nicotinic antagonists, followed by a slow, prolonged depolarizing potential. 4. The slow, prolonged depolarizing potential is not blocked by nicotinic or muscarinic cholinergic antagonists but is mimicked and occluded by exogenously applied serotonin. 5. The prolonged excitation, mediated at least in part by serotonin, may be responsible for the recruitment of the gastric mill neurons into the pyloric motor pattern. Thus sensory input can directly exert prolonged modulatory effects that change the functional cellular composition of pattern-generating circuits.


1986 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Locatelli ◽  
A. Torsello ◽  
M. Redaelli ◽  
E. Ghigo ◽  
F. Massara ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Recently, data have been presented showing that muscarinic cholinergic agonists or antagonists can modulate, in opposite ways, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH release in man. The aim of the present study was, first, to confirm these findings in the rat and, secondly, if confirmed, to investigate the mechanism(s) subserving the effect of cholinergic drugs. In adult male rats bearing chronic indwelling atrial cannulae, pretreatment with the cholinergic antagonists pirenzepine (0·5 mg/kg, i.v.) or atropine (0·5 mg/kg, i.v.) significantly reduced the rise in plasma GH induced by GHRH (2 μg/kg, i.v.), while pretreatment with the cholinergic agonist pilocarpine (3 mg/kg, i.v.) potentiated it. In rats with hypothalamic somatostatin (SRIF) depletion, i.e. rats with anterolateral deafferentation of the mediobasal hypothalamus or rats treated with cysteamine, the modulatory action of cholinergic drugs on the neuroendocrine effect of GHRH was completely lacking. In these two experimental models, an antiserum raised against SRIF failed to elicit a rise in plasma GH and measurement of hypothalamic SRIF content revealed a clear-cut reduction of the neuropeptide. Atropine (1 μmol/l) and pilocarpine (1 μmol/l), added to pituitary cells in vitro, failed to alter GHRH-induced GH release. The present results indicate that muscarinic cholinergic agonists and antagonists modulate GHRH-induced GH release in the rat and suggest that the effect of cholinergic modulation takes place through SRIF. J. Endocr. (1986) 111, 271–278


1988 ◽  
Vol 453 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 385-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Sills ◽  
Alan M. Mellow ◽  
Trey Sunderland ◽  
David M. Jacobowitz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document