Index of refraction, dispersion, bandgap and light scattering in GeSe and GeSbSe glasses

1987 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Klocek ◽  
Luigi Colombo
1973 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 1341-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Vrba ◽  
R. R. Haering

It is shown how the frequency, wavelength, intensity, and propagation direction of waves present in ultrasonic wave fields may be determined by light scattering experiments. The relationship between index of refraction variations and arbitrary strain fields is developed for hexagonal crystals and explicit results valid for CdS crystals are presented.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 014010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy D. Wilson ◽  
William J. Cottrell ◽  
Thomas H. Foster

1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Racey ◽  
P. Rochon

Rayleigh's equations are shown to provide a very good model for the forward-light-scattering spectra of ≈30-μm Pyrex fibres. The irradiance pattern is shown to be uniquely matched over the 10° scattering range of the experiment, producing values for the diameter and index of refraction that are good to better than 0.1% and 0.03% respectively. The extreme sensitivity of this technique is examined to show why it is so difficult to match irradiance patterns over such large ranges of scattering angle.


Author(s):  
Shahrara Vaezy ◽  
John I. Clark ◽  
Judy M. Clark

The neonatal mouse lens opacifies at temperatures below the phase separation temperature (Tcat). The opacification starts at the center of the lens, the lens nucleus, and progressively expands to the peripheral regions of the lens, the lens cortex. Tcat is higher in the lens nucleus than in the lens cortex. The opacification is the result of an increase in the size of the fluctuations in the index of refraction. When these fluctuations are smaller than ½ the wavelength of visible light, little light scattering occurs, and the lens is transparent. It is only when the fluctuations in the index of refraction reach dimensions of ½ the wavelength of visible light that significant light scattering takes place. We have observed two distinct structures in the phase separated mouse lens, both of which have the above criterion for opacification.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258429
Author(s):  
Fan Yin ◽  
Domarin Khago ◽  
Rachel W. Martin ◽  
Carter T. Butts

Static light scattering is a popular physical chemistry technique that enables calculation of physical attributes such as the radius of gyration and the second virial coefficient for a macromolecule (e.g., a polymer or a protein) in solution. The second virial coefficient is a physical quantity that characterizes the magnitude and sign of pairwise interactions between particles, and hence is related to aggregation propensity, a property of considerable scientific and practical interest. Estimating the second virial coefficient from experimental data is challenging due both to the degree of precision required and the complexity of the error structure involved. In contrast to conventional approaches based on heuristic ordinary least squares estimates, Bayesian inference for the second virial coefficient allows explicit modeling of error processes, incorporation of prior information, and the ability to directly test competing physical models. Here, we introduce a fully Bayesian model for static light scattering experiments on small-particle systems, with joint inference for concentration, index of refraction, oligomer size, and the second virial coefficient. We apply our proposed model to study the aggregation behavior of hen egg-white lysozyme and human γS-crystallin using in-house experimental data. Based on these observations, we also perform a simulation study on the primary drivers of uncertainty in this family of experiments, showing in particular the potential for improved monitoring and control of concentration to aid inference.


Author(s):  
F. Hasselbach ◽  
A. Schäfer

Möllenstedt and Wohland proposed in 1980 two methods for measuring the coherence lengths of electron wave packets interferometrically by observing interference fringe contrast in dependence on the longitudinal shift of the wave packets. In both cases an electron beam is split by an electron optical biprism into two coherent wave packets, and subsequently both packets travel part of their way to the interference plane in regions of different electric potential, either in a Faraday cage (Fig. 1a) or in a Wien filter (crossed electric and magnetic fields, Fig. 1b). In the Faraday cage the phase and group velocity of the upper beam (Fig.1a) is retarded or accelerated according to the cage potential. In the Wien filter the group velocity of both beams varies with its excitation while the phase velocity remains unchanged. The phase of the electron wave is not affected at all in the compensated state of the Wien filter since the electron optical index of refraction in this state equals 1 inside and outside of the Wien filter.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document