scholarly journals Orbital and suborbital variability in North Atlantic bottom water temperature obtained from deep-sea ostracod Mg/Ca ratios

2000 ◽  
Vol 162 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 45-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.M. Cronin ◽  
G.S. Dwyer ◽  
P.A. Baker ◽  
J. Rodriguez-Lazaro ◽  
D.M. DeMartino
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2391-2422
Author(s):  
F. Miesner ◽  
A. Lechleiter ◽  
C. Müller

Abstract. Temperature fields in marine sediments are studied for various purposes. Often, the target of research is the steady state heat flow as a (possible) source of energy but there are also studies attempting to reconstruct bottom water temperature variations to understand more about climate history. The bottom water temperature propagates into the sediment to different depths, depending on the amplitude and period of the deviation. The steady state heat flow can only be determined when the bottom water temperature is constant while the bottom water temperature history can only be reconstructed when the deviation has an amplitude large enough or the measurements are taken in great depths. In this work, the aim is to reconstruct recent bottom water temperature history such as the last two years. To this end, measurements to depths of up to 6 m shall be adequate and amplitudes smaller than 1 K should be reconstructable. First, a commonly used forward model is introduced and analyzed: knowing the bottom water temperature deviation in the last years and the thermal properties of the sediments, the forward model gives the sediment temperature field. Next, an inversion operator and two common inversion schemes are introduced. The analysis of the inversion operator and both algorithms is kept short, but sources for further reading are given. The algorithms are then tested for artificial data with different noise levels and for two example data sets, one from the German North Sea and one from the Davis Strait. Both algorithms show good and stable results for artificial data. The achieved results for measured data have low variances and match to the observed oceanographic settings. Lastly, the desired and obtained accuracy are discussed. For artificial data, the presented method yields satisfying results. However, for measured data the interpretation of the results is more difficult as the exact form of the bottom water deviation is not known. Nevertheless, the presented inversion method seems rather promising due to its accuracy and stability for artificial data. Continuing to work on the development of more sophisticated models for the bottom water temperature, we hope to cover more different oceanographic settings in the future.


2015 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 19-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Xing ◽  
Julian P. Sachs ◽  
Wenxian Gao ◽  
Shuqing Tao ◽  
Xiaochen Zhao ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Margretha Húsgarð Larsen ◽  
Bogi Hansen ◽  
Hjálmar Hátún ◽  
Svein Østerhus

<p>Since November 1995, we have monitored the volume transport of Faroe Bank Channel overflow (FBC-overflow) and since 2001, the bottom temperature at the sill of the channel. The FBC-overflow is the coldest and densest overflow component and contributes approximately one third of the total overflow. Together with water that it entrains en route, it is therefore one of the main sources for North Atlantic Deep Water and the lower limb of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). In spite of reported AMOC weakening, the FBC-overflow has shown no signs of reduced volume transport. In contrast, a linear trend analysis indicated a weak (but non-significant) positive trend in volume transport of +5% from 1996 to 2018. The bottom water at the sill of the channel is the coldest component of the FBC-overflow and the densest overflow component overall. Since high-quality monitoring of the bottom water temperature began in summer 2001, the bottom water has warmed by approximately 0.2 °C with most of the warming occurring in two periods: 2004-2007 and 2015-2019. During the period, salinity has also been changing and the combined temperature/salinity effect on the density of the FBC-overflow will be discussed.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng‐Qi Huang ◽  
Xian‐Rong Cen ◽  
Shuang‐Xi Guo ◽  
Yuan‐Zheng Lu ◽  
Sheng‐Qi Zhou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document