Excessive Breast Self-Examination Among First-Degree Relatives of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients

1997 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Epstein ◽  
Ting Hsiang Lin ◽  
Janet Audrain ◽  
Michael Stefanek ◽  
Barbara Rimer ◽  
...  
Cancer ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 2528-2532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelley E. Taylor ◽  
Rosemary R. Lichtman ◽  
Joanne V. Wood ◽  
Avrum Z. Bluming ◽  
Gary M. Dosik ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Tamburini ◽  
Giovanna Massara ◽  
Lucio Bertario ◽  
Alberto Re ◽  
Sergio Di Pietro

The knowledge and practice of breast self-examination (BSE) was investigated among 500 women with operable breast tumors between 35 and 64 years of age (all successively operated) and 652 healthy women, matched with the previous group for 5-year age groups from 35 to 54 years. Only 39.9 % of breast cancer women and 34.5 % of the controls practiced BSE, and only a third of these did it monthly. Such practice tends to progressively decrease, starting from 45 years, and it is used less frequently by the women with a poor education and those in a lower economic bracket. Among the 500 breast cancer patients, those who practiced the self-examination had a higher number of tumors with a diameter no greater than 2 cm and a lower number with a diameter larger than 4 cm. In addition, in this group the percentage of unaffected axillary lymph nodes (N–) was 58.8 % compared to 48.8 % for the group that did not practice self-examination, and the percentage of the cases with more than 3 metastatic lymph nodes (N+ > 3) was 20.0 % in the first group and 27.3 % of the second one. These differences are statistically significant. The correlation between tumor diameter and the histologic lymph node stage is equally evident, since there is a progressive reduction in N– cases and a contemporary progressive increase in N+ (> 3) cases with increasing breast tumor diameter. Therefore, we can infer that the lack of practice of BSE causes a diagnostic and therapeutic delay, which is responsible for aggravation of the prognosis.


2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-40
Author(s):  
M. Abdel Fattah ◽  
A. Zaki ◽  
A. Bassili ◽  
M. El Shazly ◽  
G. Tognoni

This study estimated the frequency of breast-self examination practice and its possible relation to the stage of the disease at diagnosis and patient-related delay in diagnosis among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Breast self-examination was practised in 10.4% of cases. It was performed by patients from higher socioeconomic levels and those with a positive family history of breast cancer or benign breast mass. There was significant association between failure to practise breast self-examination and diagnostic delay. We emphasize the need for breast self-examination awareness campaigns as a key measure for ensuring earlier diagnosis and hence better prognoses for breast cancer patients in our community


Author(s):  
Nils Martin Bruckmann ◽  
Julian Kirchner ◽  
Lale Umutlu ◽  
Wolfgang Peter Fendler ◽  
Robert Seifert ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. Material and methods A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer was enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI, computed tomography (CT) scan, and a bone scintigraphy prior to therapy. All datasets were evaluated regarding the presence of bone metastases. McNemar χ2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. Results Forty-one bone metastases were present in 7/154 patients (4.5%). Both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone were able to detect all of the patients with histopathologically proven bone metastases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) and did not miss any of the 41 malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%). CT detected 5/7 patients (sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 98.6%) and 23/41 lesions (sensitivity 56.1%). Bone scintigraphy detected only 2/7 patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and 15/41 lesions (sensitivity 36.6%). Furthermore, CT and scintigraphy led to false-positive findings of bone metastases in 2 patients and in 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivity of PET/MRI and MRI alone was significantly better compared with CT (p < 0.01, difference 43.9%) and bone scintigraphy (p < 0.01, difference 63.4%). Conclusion [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI are significantly better than CT or bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Both CT and bone scintigraphy show a substantially limited sensitivity in detection of bone metastases. Key Points • [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone are significantly superior to CT and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. • Radiation-free whole-body MRI might serve as modality of choice in detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.


2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1122
Author(s):  
Rajeshkumar Balasubramanian ◽  
D. Leff ◽  
F. Aref ◽  
L. Wilding ◽  
S. Salakianathan ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
E. Una ◽  
M.J. Borau ◽  
J. Nieto ◽  
A. De la Torre ◽  
G. Fernandez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document