[37] Cultures as epithelial models: Porous-bottom culture dishes for studying transport and differentiation

Author(s):  
Joseph S. Handler ◽  
Nordica Green ◽  
Roderick E. Steele
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 547 ◽  
pp. 121-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
LC Kluger ◽  
MH Taylor ◽  
E Barriga Rivera ◽  
E Torres Silva ◽  
M Wolff

2001 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 796-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
HOWARD KATOR ◽  
MARTHA RHODES

Declining oyster (Crassostrea virginica) production in the Chesapeake Bay has stimulated aquaculture based on floats for off-bottom culture. While advantages of off-bottom culture are significant, the increased use of floating containers raises public health and microbiological concerns, because oysters in floats may be more susceptible to fecal contamination from storm runoff compared to those cultured on-bottom. We conducted four commercial-scale studies with market-size oysters naturally contaminated with fecal coliforms (FC) and a candidate viral indicator, F-specific RNA (FRNA) coliphage. To facilitate sampling and to test for location effects, 12 replicate subsamples, each consisting of 15 to 20 randomly selected oysters in plastic mesh bags, were placed at four characteristic locations within a 0.6- by 3.0-m “Taylor” float, and the remaining oysters were added to a depth not exceeding 15.2 cm. The float containing approximately 3,000 oysters was relaid in the York River, Virginia, for 14 days. During relay, increases in shellfish FC densities followed rain events such that final mean levels exceeded initial levels or did not meet an arbitrary product end point of 50 FC/100 ml. FRNA coliphage densities decreased to undetectable levels within 14 days (16 to 28°C) in all but the last experiment, when temperatures fell between 12 and 16°C. Friedman (nonparametric analysis of variance) tests performed on FC/Escherichia coli and FRNA densities indicated no differences in counts as a function of location within the float. The public health consequences of these observations are discussed, and future research and educational needs are identified.


Aquaculture ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 189 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 73-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.N Maeda-Martı́nez ◽  
P Ormart ◽  
L Mendez ◽  
B Acosta ◽  
M.T Sicard

2016 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 8-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob J. Capelle ◽  
Jeroen W.M. Wijsman ◽  
Marnix R. van Stralen ◽  
Peter M.J. Herman ◽  
Aad C. Smaal

Aquaculture ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 314 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 252-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Mendo ◽  
V. Koch ◽  
M. Wolff ◽  
F. Sínsel ◽  
C. Ruiz-Verdugo

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart H. Munsch ◽  
Julie S. Barber ◽  
Jeffery R. Cordell ◽  
Peter M. Kiffney ◽  
Beth L. Sanderson ◽  
...  

AbstractMany nearshore ecosystems are modified by aquaculture, including bivalve culture to produce food and restore extirpated populations. Small invertebrates in nearshore ecosystems support fundamental ecological processes, but the effects of bivalve culture on invertebrates are incompletely understood. Here, we compared invertebrate assemblages from multiple studies of bivalve-cultivated and unmodified nearshore habitats along the US west coast. In general, unmodified eelgrass and nearby off-bottom culture habitats with eelgrass present were inhabited by a greater abundance, richness, and diversity of epibenthic invertebrates than bottom culture and bare (mud, sand) habitats that both lacked eelgrass. Findings of individual studies suggested: minor differences in epibenthic invertebrate assemblages associated with various aquaculture practices; restoring native oysters to mudflats did not detectably alter epibenthic invertebrate abundances; epibenthic invertebrates were more abundant on shell hash introduced to mudflats than unmodified mudflats; and benthic invertebrates were less abundant, rich, and diverse in habitats cultured on bottom by Manila clams. Considering the range of these patterns, there appears to be potential for coastal communities to restore extirpated bivalve populations or develop bivalve culture practices that meet objectives to grow food while maintaining nearshore ecosystems’ fundamental processes supported by robust invertebrate assemblages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document