Residential Versus Community Treatment of Personality Disorders: A Comparative Study of Three Treatment Programs

Summary. Objective: A comparative study of the personality structure from the perspective the Five-factor personality model (“Big Five”) in mentally healthy and in people with personality disorders depending on the leading radical determined by the clinical method.Materials and methods: a comparative study of personality structures in the mentally healthy (13 people) and in individuals with personality disorders (47 people) was carried out. To assess the personality structure, the NEO-Five Factor Inventory questionnaire was used. Persons with personality disorders were divided into groups in accordance with the leading radical: 24 — with emotionally unstable; 13 — with a histrionic; 6 — with schizoid; 4 — with paranoid radicals.Results: There were no differences in the values of the domains of the Five-Factor personality model between a group of individuals with personality disorders and the norm. The features of domain indicators of the Five-factor personality model were revealed in individuals with personality disorder depending on theradical.Conclusion: The NEO-Five Factor Inventory questionnaire, like most other tools from the perspective of the Five-Factor Model, is not suitable for assessing a person in terms of assigning it to variants of a mental disorder. When comparing the categorical and dimensional approaches to assessing the structure of personality disorders, it was found that the obligate personality traits identified using the categorical approach are fully reflected in the «Big Five» in individuals with a leading schizoid radical. The relations of obligate personal traits with the domains of the Five-factor model of personality in individuals with other (paranoid, histrionic,and emotionally unstable) radicals are less clear.

Download Full-text

Does providing opiate maintenance therapy during incarceration increase participation in community treatment programs after release?

Evidence-Based Practice ◽

10.1097/ebp.0000000000001315 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽

Author(s):

Ahmad Abdl-Haleem ◽

Mary R. Talen

Keyword(s):

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Community Treatment ◽

Treatment Programs ◽

Opiate Maintenance Therapy ◽

Community Treatment Programs

Download Full-text

Diverting Special Categories of Offenders to Community Treatment Programs

Correctional Counseling and Treatment ◽

10.1007/978-3-319-54349-9_6 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. 93-112

Author(s):

Peter C. Kratcoski

Keyword(s):

Community Treatment ◽

Treatment Programs ◽

Community Treatment Programs

Download Full-text

Comorbidity of dsm-iii-r personality disorders in schizophrenic and unipolar mood disorders: a comparative study

European Psychiatry ◽

10.1016/s0924-9338(97)84793-1 ◽

1997 ◽

Vol 12 (6) ◽

pp. 316-318 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

P Oulis ◽

L Lykouras ◽

J Hatzimanolis ◽

V Tomaras

Keyword(s):

Personality Disorder ◽

Mental Disorders ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Mood Disorder ◽

Personality Disorders ◽

Mood Disorders ◽

Clinical Interview ◽

Statistical Manual ◽

Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽

Patient Groups

SummaryWe investigated the overall prevalence and the differential comorbidity of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-III-R personality disorders in 166 remitted or recovered patients with schizophrenic (n = 102) or unipolar mood disorder (n = 64). Over 60% of both patient groups met the DSM-III-R criteria of at least one DSM-III-R personality disorder as assessed by means of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID-II-R), receiving on average 3.1 personality diagnoses. Neither DSM-III-R categories of personality disorders, nor scores on its three clusters A, B and C, nor total score on SCID-II-R differed significantly across the two groups. In conclusion, DSM-III-R personality disorders, although highly prevalent in schizophrenic and unipolar mood disorders, lack any specificity with respect to these categories of mental disorders.

Download Full-text

Client Outcomes and the Working Alliance in Assertive Community Treatment Programs

Care Management Journals ◽

10.1891/cmaj.2004.5.4.199 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 199-202 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Robert J. Calsyn ◽

Gary A. Morse ◽

W. Dean Klinkenberg ◽

Matthew R. Lemming

Keyword(s):

Substance Use ◽

Working Alliance ◽

Assertive Community Treatment ◽

Psychiatric Symptoms ◽

Case Manager ◽

Self Report ◽

Community Treatment ◽

Treatment Programs ◽

Client Outcome ◽

Abuse Treatment

This study examined the relationship between outcomes and the working alliance in clients who were receiving assertive community treatment only or integrated assertive community treatment (assertive community treatment plus substance abuse treatment). All 98 participants had a severe mental illness and a substance use disorder. The Working Alliance Inventory assessed the alliance from the perspective of both the client and the case manager at 3 and 15 months into treatment. The six outcome measures were stable housing, client rating of psychiatric distress, interviewer rating of psychiatric symptoms, self-report of days used alcohol or drugs, and interviewer rating of substance use. Only 4 of 24 correlations were significant, indicating little relationship between the strength of the working alliance and client outcome.

Download Full-text