Comparison of Combat and Non-Combat Burns From Ongoing U.S. Military Operations

2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 ◽  
pp. 55-57
Author(s):  
D.W. Mozingo
Keyword(s):  
1969 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 702-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Sulzberger

Author(s):  
Jennifer Phillips ◽  
Patricia L. McDermott ◽  
Marvin Thordsen ◽  
Michael McCloskey ◽  
Gary Klein

1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl L. Spinweber ◽  
Schuyler C. Webb ◽  
Christian Gillin

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett J. Lawless ◽  
Philippe Constantineau ◽  
Ali Dizboni
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ľubomír Zvada

This Handbook maps the contours of an exciting and burgeoning interdisciplinary field concerned with the role of language and languages in situations of conflict. It explores conceptual approaches, sources of information that are available, and the institutions and actors that mediate language encounters. It examines case studies of the role that languages have played in specific conflicts, from colonial times through to the Middle East and Africa today. The contributors provide vibrant evidence to challenge the monolingual assumptions that have affected traditional views of war and conflict. They show that languages are woven into every aspect of the making of war and peace, and demonstrate how language shapes public policy and military strategy, setting frameworks and expectations. The Handbook's 22 chapters powerfully illustrate how the encounter between languages is integral to almost all conflicts, to every phase of military operations and to the lived experiences of those on the ground, who meet, work and fight with speakers of other languages. This comprehensive work will appeal to scholars from across the disciplines of linguistics, translation studies, history, and international relations; and provide fresh insights for a broad range of practitioners interested in understanding the role and implications of foreign languages in war.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-162
Author(s):  
Paul Tudorache ◽  
Lucian Ispas

AbstractUsing the lessons learned from recent military operations such as Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) from Syria and Iraq, we proposed to investigate the need for tactical military units to adapt operationally to grapple with the most common requirements specific to current operational environments, but also for those that can be foreseen in the future. In this regard, by identifying the best practices in the field that can be met at the level of some important armies, such as USA and UK, we will try to determine a common denominator of most important principles whose application may facilitate both operational and organizational adaptation necessary for tactical military units to perform missions and tasks in the most unknown future operational environments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document