Managed competition and consumer price sensitivity in social health insurance

2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1009-1029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederik T Schut ◽  
Wolter H.J Hassink
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Price Sensitivity ◽  
Managed Competition

Supplementary Health Insurance and Regulation of Healthcare Systems

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte Dormont
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Cost Sharing ◽  
Social Insurance ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Managed Competition ◽  
Benefit Package ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Supplementary Health Insurance

Most developed nations provide generous coverage of care services, using either a tax financed healthcare system or social health insurance. Such systems pursue efficiency and equity in care provision. Efficiency means that expenditures are minimized for a given level of care services. Equity means that individuals with equal needs have equal access to the benefit package. In order to limit expenditures, social health insurance systems explicitly limit their benefit package. Moreover, most such systems have introduced cost sharing so that beneficiaries bear some cost when using care services. These limits on coverage create room for private insurance that complements or supplements social health insurance. Everywhere, social health insurance coexists along with voluntarily purchased supplementary private insurance. While the latter generally covers a small portion of health expenditures, it can interfere with the functioning of social health insurance. Supplementary health insurance can be detrimental to efficiency through several mechanisms. It limits competition in managed competition settings. It favors excessive care consumption through coverage of cost sharing and of services that are complementary to those included in social insurance benefits. It can also hinder achievement of the equity goals inherent to social insurance. Supplementary insurance creates inequality in access to services included in the social benefits package. Individuals with high incomes are more likely to buy supplementary insurance, and the additional care consumption resulting from better coverage creates additional costs that are borne by social health insurance. In addition, there are other anti-redistributive mechanisms from high to low risks. Social health insurance should be designed, not as an isolated institution, but with an awareness of the existence—and the possible expansion—of supplementary health insurance.

Slovakia

2021 ◽  
pp. 767-787
Author(s):  
Tamara Popic
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Political Conflict ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Managed Competition ◽  
Healthcare Provision ◽  
Health Politics ◽  
Dramatic Shift ◽  
Insurance Model

This chapter offers an in-depth look at health politics and the health system in Slovakia based on compulsory social health insurance. It traces the development of the Slovak healthcare system, characterized by the shift from a social health insurance model to a Semashko model of health provision under communism. Slovak post-communist health politics has been marked by strong left–right political conflict and institutional barriers to reforms. Nevertheless, health policy in Slovakia displays a dramatic shift to a market-oriented healthcare provision based on user fees and managed competition, introduced in 2003 and 2004. Attempts to reverse market-oriented reforms were partially successful and have involved supranational and international authorities of the European Commission and of the International Court of Arbitration. As outlined in the chapter, some of the main issues facing the Slovak healthcare system have been overcapacity in the hospital sector, a malfunctioning referral system, and corruption.

Hungary

2021 ◽  
pp. 723-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mária Éva Földes
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Universal Access ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Quality Of Healthcare ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Managed Competition ◽  
Access To Health Services ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
The Social ◽  
Insurance Model

This chapter offers an in-depth look at health politics and the social health insurance-based system in Hungary. It traces the development of the Hungarian healthcare system, characterized by seismic shifts from a Bismarckian, solidarity-based social health insurance to centrally planned healthcare pledging universal access to health services as a citizen’s right. After the fall of state socialism, Hungary returned to a social health insurance model, and since then the main policy efforts have focused on decentralization, strengthening of private provision and entrepreneurship, and financial consolidation of the health system. After the highly contested and ultimately failed attempt to introduce managed competition and user fees between 2006 and 2008, there has been a shift back to an increasingly centralized system with tax-based financing. As noted in the chapter, the consequences of recentralization for the solidarity, accessibility, affordability, and quality of healthcare in Hungary are still to be seen.

Which Therapeutic Progress Shall be Paid by Social Health Insurance?

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Wasem ◽  
Hans-Dieter Nolting ◽  
Yvonne Grabbe ◽  
Stefan Loos
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Social Health

scholarly journals Participatory and responsive governance in universal health coverage: an analysis of legislative provisions in Thailand

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e004117
Author(s):  
Aniqa Islam Marshall ◽  
Kanang Kantamaturapoj ◽  
Kamonwan Kiewnin ◽  
Somtanuek Chotchoungchatchai ◽  
Walaiporn Patcharanarumol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Universal Coverage ◽  
Civil Servant ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Medical Benefit ◽  
The Social ◽  
Universal Health ◽  
Universal Coverage Scheme

Participatory and responsive governance in universal health coverage (UHC) systems synergistically ensure the needs of citizens are protected and met. In Thailand, UHC constitutes of three public insurance schemes: Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme, Social Health Insurance and Universal Coverage Scheme. Each scheme is governed through individual laws. This study aimed to identify, analyse and compare the legislative provisions related to participatory and responsive governance within the three public health insurance schemes and draw lessons that can be useful for other low-income and middle-income countries in their legislative process for UHC. The legislative provisions in each policy document were analysed using a conceptual framework derived from key literature. The results found that overall the UHC legislative provisions promote citizen representation and involvement in UHC governance, implementation and management, support citizens’ ability to voice concerns and improve UHC, protect citizens’ access to information as well as ensure access to and provision of quality care. Participatory governance is legislated in 33 sections, of which 23 are in the Universal Coverage Scheme, 4 in the Social Health Insurance and none in the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Responsive governance is legislated in 24 sections, of which 18 are in the Universal Coverage Scheme, 2 in the Social Health Insurance and 4 in the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Therefore, while several legislative provisions on both participatory and responsive governance exist in the Thai UHC, not all schemes equally bolster citizen participation and government responsiveness. In addition, as legislations are merely enabling factors, adequate implementation capacity and commitment to the legislative provisions are equally important.

scholarly journals Effects of cancer treatment on household impoverishment: a multicentre cross-sectional study in China

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e044322
Author(s):  
Wenqi Fu ◽  
Jufang Shi ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Chengcheng Liu ◽  
Chengyao Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Poverty Line ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Daily Consumption ◽  
Out Of Pocket Payments ◽  
Per Capita

ObjectivesTo determine the incidence and intensity of household impoverishment induced by cancer treatment in China.DesignAverage income and daily consumption per capita of the households and out-of-pocket payments for cancer care were estimated. Household impoverishment was determined by comparing per capita daily consumption against the Chinese poverty line (CPL, US$1.2) and the World Bank poverty line (WBPL, US$1.9) for 2015. Both pre-treatment and post-treatment consumptions were calculated assuming that the households would divert daily consumption money to pay for cancer treatment.ParticipantsCancer patients diagnosed initially from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016 who had received cancer treatment subsequently. Those with multiple cancer diagnoses were excluded.Data sourcesA household questionnaire survey was conducted on 2534 cancer patients selected from nine hospitals in seven provinces through two-stage cluster/convenience sampling.Findings5.89% (CPL) to 12.94% (WBPL) households were impoverished after paying for cancer treatment. The adjusted OR (AOR) of post-treatment impoverishment was higher for older patients (AOR=2.666–4.187 for ≥50 years vs <50 years, p<0.001), those resided in central region (AOR=2.619 vs eastern, p<0.01) and those with lower income (AOR=0.024–0.187 in higher income households vs the lowest 20%, p<0.001). The patients without coverage from social health insurance had higher OR (AOR=1.880, p=0.040) of experiencing post-treatment household impoverishment than those enrolled with the insurance for urban employees. Cancer treatment is associated with an increase of 5.79% (CPL) and 12.45% (WBPL) in incidence of household impoverishment. The median annual consumption gap per capita underneath the poverty line accumulated by the impoverished households reached US$128 (CPL) or US$212 (WBPL). US$31 170 395 (CPL) or US$115 238 459 (WBPL) were needed to avoid household impoverishment induced by cancer treatment in China.ConclusionsThe financial burden of cancer treatment imposes a significant risk of household impoverishment despite wide coverage of social health insurance in China.

scholarly journals Social health insurance for the poor: lessons from a health insurance programme in Karnataka, India

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e000582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Sood ◽  
Zachary Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Poverty Line ◽  
Social Health ◽  
The Poor

Life-saving technology used to treat catastrophic illnesses such as heart disease and cancer is often out of reach for the poor. As life expectancy increases in poor countries and the burden from chronic illnesses continues to rise, so will the unmet need for expensive tertiary care. Understanding how best to increase access to and reduce the financial burden of expensive tertiary care is a crucial task for the global health community in the coming decades. In 2010, Karnataka, a state in India, rolled out the Vajpayee Arogyashree scheme (VAS), a social health insurance scheme focused on increasing access to tertiary care for households below the poverty line. VAS was rolled out in a way that allowed for robust evaluation of its causal effects and several studies have examined various impacts of the scheme on poor households. In this analysis article, we summarise the key findings and assess how these findings can be used to inform other social health insurance schemes. First, the evidence suggests that VAS led to a substantial reduction in mortality driven by increased tertiary care utilisation as well as use of better quality facilities and earlier diagnosis. Second, VAS significantly reduced the financial burden of receiving tertiary care. Third, these benefits of social health insurance were achieved at a reasonable cost to society and taxpayers. Several unique features of VAS led to its success at improving health and financial well-being including effective outreach via health camps, targeting expensive conditions with high disease burden, easy enrolment process, cashless treatment, bundled payment for hospital services, participation of both public and private hospitals and prior authorisation to improve appropriateness of care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document