scholarly journals SP-0589: Role of systemic therapy in the treatment of brain metastases

2016 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. S282-S283
Author(s):  
R. Dziadziuszko
2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13052-e13052
Author(s):  
Shyamal Patel ◽  
Waleed Fouad Mourad ◽  
Rebekah L. Young ◽  
Rafi Kabarriti ◽  
Ravindra Yaparpalvi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Adam M. Robin ◽  
Steven N. Kalkanis

A significant percentage of patients with systemic cancer will develop brain metastasis at some point in the course of their disease. Brain metastases should be suspected if patients with known cancer histories present with new neurologic symptoms. Treatment for brain metastasis typically involves radiation. Patients with large, symptomatic and/or solitary brain metastases may benefit from surgical resection in addition to radiation. The role of systemic therapy for brain metastases remains somewhat limited, but newer treatment strategies such as immune therapy and molecular targeted agents may play a role in the future.


2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (suppl 5) ◽  
pp. v193-v193
Author(s):  
S. Patel ◽  
W. F. Mourad ◽  
R. Young ◽  
R. Kabarriti ◽  
R. Patel ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13527-e13527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Niwinska ◽  
Tadeusz Pienkowski ◽  
Katarzyna Pogoda ◽  
Agnieszka Irena Jagiello-Gruszfeld ◽  
Izabela Lemanska ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
pp. 406-412
Author(s):  
Paul Okunieff ◽  
Michael C. Schell ◽  
Russell Ruo ◽  
E. Ronald Hale ◽  
Walter G. O'Dell ◽  
...  

✓ The role of radiosurgery in the treatment of patients with advanced-stage metastatic disease is currently under debate. Previous randomized studies have not consistently supported the use of radiosurgery to treat patients with numbers of brain metastases. In negative-results studies, however, intracranial tumor control was high but extracranial disease progressed; thus, patient survival was not greatly affected, although neurocognitive function was generally maintained until death. Because the future promises improved systemic (extracranial) therapy, the successful control of brain disease is that much more crucial. Thus, for selected patients with multiple metastases to the brain who remain in good neurological condition, aggressive lesion-targeting radiosurgery should be very useful. Although a major limitation to success of this therapy is the lack of control of extracranial disease in most patients, it is clear that well-designed, aggressive treatment substantially decreases the progression of brain metastases and also improves neurocognitive survival. The authors present the management and a methodology for rational treatment of a patient with breast cancer who has harbored 24 brain metastases during a 3-year period.


2021 ◽  
Vol 91 (S2) ◽  
pp. 3-13
Author(s):  
B. Mark Smithers ◽  
Robyn P. M. Saw ◽  
David E. Gyorki ◽  
Richard C. W. Martin ◽  
Victoria Atkinson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii183-ii183
Author(s):  
Kevin Fan ◽  
Nafisha Lalani ◽  
Nathalie Levasseur ◽  
Andra Krauze ◽  
Lovedeep Gondara ◽  
...  

Abstract PURPOSE We aimed to investigate whether systemic therapy (ST) use around the time of brain radiotherapy (RT) predicts overall survival for patients with brain metastases (BM). We also aimed to validate the Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) in a population-based cohort. METHODS We used provincial RT and pharmacy databases to retrospectively review all adult patients in British Columbia, Canada, who received a first course of RT for BMs between 2012 and 2016. We used a randomly selected subset with complete baseline data to develop a multivariate analysis (MVA)-based nomogram including ST use to predict survival after RT and to validate the DS-GPA. RESULTS In our 3095-patient cohort, the median overall survival (OS) of the 999 recipients of ST after RT was 5.0 months (CI 4.1-6.0) longer than the OS of the 2096 non-recipients of ST after RT (p< 0.0001): targeted therapy (HR 0.42, CI 0.37-0.48), hormone therapy (HR 0.45, CI 0.36-0.55) and cytotoxic chemotherapy (HR 0.71, CI 0.64-0.79). The OS of patients who discontinued ST after RT was 0.9 months (CI 0.3-1.4) shorter than the OS of those who did not receive ST before nor after RT (p< 0.0001). A MVA in the 200-patient subset demonstrated that the traditional baseline variables: cancer diagnosis, age, performance status, presence of extracranial disease, and number of BMs predicted survival, as did the novel variables: ST use before RT and ST use after RT. The MVA-based nomogram had a bootstrap-corrected Harrell’s Concordance Index of 0.70. In the 179 patients within this subset with DS-GPA-compatible diagnoses, the DS-GPA overestimated OS by 6.3 months (CI 5.3- 9.8) (p= 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS The type and timing of ST use around RT predict survival for patients with BMs. A novel baseline variable “ST planned after RT” should be prospectively collected to validate these findings in other cohorts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document