Abstract
Background
Treatment for patients who have achieved clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy has not been established, with no consensus regarding the indications for either esophagectomy or non-surgical treatment.
Methods
Among 1545 patients with esophageal cancer at Toranomon Hospital between January 2006 and August 2017, 39 who achieved cCR after neoadjuvant treatment were divided into two groups according to treatment: esophagectomy group (n = 18) andtreatment group (n = 21) for comparison.
Results
No significant intergroup difference was observed in baseline characteristics. Pathological complete response was confirmed in 13 (72.2%) of the 18 patients who underwent esophagectomy, while residual tumor was detected at the location of primary tumor in 2 (11.1%) patients and lymph node metastasis was found in 3 (16.7%) patients. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly longer in the esophagectomy group than in the non-surgical group (P = 0.002). Disease-specific survival (DSS) was significantly longer in the esophagectomy group (P = 0.007). However, no significant intergroup difference was observed in overall survival estimated based on all deaths, including (P = 0.451).
Conclusion
With improved diagnostic accuracy, non-surgical treatment can be an option for patients estimated as cCR after treatment administered in a neoadjuvant setting. However, surgical resection is considered more appropriate because of residual tumor in some patients with cCR and because of superior DSS and RFS following esophagectomy compared with non-surgical treatment. Future studies must focus on ameliorating late postoperative complications such as respiratory failure and aspiration pneumonia.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Clinical complete response after nivolumab administered as a third-line treatment for unresectable advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination: A case report
