Clinical Characteristics of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Spain. Liver Cirrhosis and High AFP are not Always Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. S322-S323
Author(s):  
C. Rodriguez-Lope ◽  
M. Forne ◽  
J. Fuentes ◽  
M. Reig ◽  
V. Andreu ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. e592-e593
Author(s):  
Jun Sik Yoon ◽  
Dong Ho Lee ◽  
Eun Ju Cho ◽  
Hyo Young Lee ◽  
Sun Woong Kim ◽  
...  

Liver Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 744-755
Author(s):  
Francesco Tovoli ◽  
Pietro Guerra ◽  
Massimo Iavarone ◽  
Letizia Veronese ◽  
Matteo Renzulli ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Due to its poor survival, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is held to be a much more aggressive cancer than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In most published series, patients were diagnosed when symptomatic. However, ICC is now increasingly being discovered during the surveillance for HCC in cirrhosis. Whether this earlier detection of ICC is associated with an equally dismal prognosis or not is unknown. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is amulticenter retrospective study of consecutive ICC patients. Patients were stratified into subgroups according to the absence/presence of cirrhosis. A propensity score matching was performed to reduce the potential biases. Cirrhotic patients were further stratified according to their surveillance status. The lead-time bias and its potential effects were also estimated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We gathered 184 patients. Eighty-five patients (46.2%) were cirrhotic. Liver cirrhosis was not related to a worse overall survival (33.0 vs. 32.0 months, <i>p</i> = 0.800) even after the propensity score analysis (43.0 in vs. 44.0 months in 54 pairs of patients, <i>p</i> = 0.878). Among the cirrhotic population, 47 (55.3%) patients had received a diagnosis of ICC during a surveillance programme. The 2 subgroups differed in maximum tumour dimensions (30 vs. 48 mm in surveyed and non-surveyed patients, respectively). Surveyed patients were more likely to receive surgical treatments (59.8 vs. 28.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Overall survival was higher in surveyed patients (51.0 vs. 21.0 months, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). These benefits were confirmed after correcting for the lead-time bias. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Cirrhotic patients have different clinical presentation and outcomes of ICC according to their surveillance status. In our series, ICC in cirrhosis was not associated with worse OS. Cirrhosis itself should not discourage either surgical or non-surgical treatments.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15162-e15162
Author(s):  
Ravindhi Lakmalee Nathavitharana ◽  
Mabel Joey Teng ◽  
Philip James Johnson ◽  
Sarah Berhane ◽  
Anna Skowronska ◽  
...  

e15162 Background: Differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) can be challenging in patients without evidence of liver cirrhosis. Definitive diagnosis is based on tissue biopsy. We investigated if the use of serum biomarkers could help differentiate between these two types of malignancies, thereby avoiding the risks associated with biopsy. Methods: Patients with cholangiocarcinoma and HCC were recruited from Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; blood samples were collected at time of diagnosis. Two biomarkers, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) were measured in the serum samples from 56 patients with cholangiocarcinoma and 35 patients with HCC without evidence of liver cirrhosis. Of the 56 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, 17 were intrahepatic and 39 were extrahepatic. Results: 17 ICC and 35 HCC were included in the analysis. The levels of AFP and DCP were much higher in HCC as compared to ICC. The median AFP was 64.6 (IQR 10.9, 3564.2) in HCC as compared to 3 (IQR 2.4, 3.9) in ICC. Similarly, the median DCP was 215.41 (IQR 22.46, 692.53) in HCC as compared to 0.33 (IQR 0.16, 1.08) in ICC. Stepwise logistic regression was performed using both biomarkers. Log- DCP remained significant at 95% level in predicting HCC from ICC, giving an AUC of 0.96. Conclusions: In patients with a non-cirrhotic liver and radiological evidence of cancer, measurement of serum AFP and DCP level may help differentiate between HCC and ICC. In this study, DCP is the most useful discriminator between HCC and ICC. Further prospective studies should be done with larger sample sizes to validate the use of AFP and DCP as diagnostic biomarkers in this clinical setting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongbin Zhang ◽  
Siyuan Chai ◽  
Lintao Chen ◽  
Yubizhuo Wang ◽  
Yongna Cheng ◽  
...  

IntroductionHepatic sarcomatoid carcinoma (HSC) is a rare type of liver cancer with a high malignant grade and poor prognosis. This study compared the clinical characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of HSCs with those of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), aiming to identify valuable features for HSC diagnosis.MethodsIn total, 17 pathologically confirmed HSC cases, 50 HCC cases and 50 common ICC cases were enrolled from two hospitals. The clinical characteristics and MRI features of all cases were summarized and statistically analyzed.ResultsOn the one hand, the incidence rates of elevated carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were significantly higher in the HSC cases than in the HCC cases (29.4% vs. 0%; 17.6% vs. 0%). The HSC enhancement patterns, primarily including progressive enhancement, were also significantly different from HCC cases. The incidence rates of heterogeneous signals on T2-weighted imaging and during the arterial phase were significantly higher in the HSC cases than in the HCC cases (94.1% vs. 66.0%; 100.0% vs. 72.0%). The diameter of HSCs was significantly larger than that in the HCC cases (6.12 cm vs. 4.21 cm), and the incidence rates of adjacent cholangiectasis, intrahepatic metastasis and lymph node enlargement were considerably higher in the HSC cases than in the HCC cases (52.9% vs. 6.0%; 47.1% vs. 12.0%; 41.2% vs. 2.0%). On the other hand, the incidence rate of elevated CA199 was significantly lower in the HSC cases than in the ICC cases (29.4% vs. 60.0%). The incidence rates of intratumoral necrosis and pseudocapsules were significantly higher in the HSC cases than in the HCC cases (35.3% vs. 8.0%; 47.1% vs. 12.0%). However, the incidence rates of target signs were significantly lower in the HSC cases than in the HCC cases (11.8% vs. 42.0%). In addition, there was no significant difference in the enhancement patterns between HSC cases and ICC cases.ConclusionsHSCs were frequently seen in elderly men with clinical symptoms and elevated CA199 levels. The MRI features, including large size, obvious heterogeneity, hemorrhage, progressive enhancement, pseudocapsule and lymph node enlargement, contributed to the diagnosis of HSC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3392
Author(s):  
Joeri Lambrecht ◽  
Mustafa Porsch-Özçürümez ◽  
Jan Best ◽  
Fabian Jost-Brinkmann ◽  
Christoph Roderburg ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Surveillance of at-risk patients for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highly necessary, as curative treatment options are only feasible in early disease stages. However, to date, screening of patients with liver cirrhosis for HCC mostly relies on suboptimal ultrasound-mediated evaluation and α-fetoprotein (AFP) measurement. Therefore, we sought to develop a novel and blood-based scoring tool for the identification of early-stage HCC. (2) Methods: Serum samples from 267 patients with liver cirrhosis, including 122 patients with HCC and 145 without, were collected. Expression levels of soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (sPDGFRβ) and routine clinical parameters were evaluated, and then utilized in logistic regression analysis. (3) Results: We developed a novel serological scoring tool, the APAC score, consisting of the parameters age, sPDGFRβ, AFP, and creatinine, which identified patients with HCC in a cirrhotic population with an AUC of 0.9503, which was significantly better than the GALAD score (AUC: 0.9000, p = 0.0031). Moreover, the diagnostic accuracy of the APAC score was independent of disease etiology, including alcohol (AUC: 0.9317), viral infection (AUC: 0.9561), and NAFLD (AUC: 0.9545). For the detection of patients with (very) early (BCLC 0/A) HCC stage or within Milan criteria, the APAC score achieved an AUC of 0.9317 (sensitivity: 85.2%, specificity: 89.2%) and 0.9488 (sensitivity: 91.1%, specificity 85.3%), respectively. (4) Conclusions: The APAC score is a novel and highly accurate serological tool for the identification of HCC, especially for early stages. It is superior to the currently proposed blood-based algorithms, and has the potential to improve surveillance of the at-risk population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document