Soft-Tissue And Bone Tumors About The Foot And Ankle

1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 909-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur K. Walling ◽  
Seth I. Gasser
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Bone Tumors ◽  
Foot And Ankle

Scintigraphy with 99m Tc-Phosphonate and 67Gallium in Patients Suspected of Primary Bone Tumors

1982 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 136-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-J. Edeling
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Bone Scintigraphy ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Bone Tumors ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Skeletal Metastases ◽  
Malignant Bone Tumors ◽  
67Ga Scintigraphy ◽  
Primary Bone Tumors ◽  
Primary Bone

Whole-body scintigraphy with both 99mTc-phosphonate and 67Ga was performed on 92 patients suspected of primary bone tumors. In 46 patients with primary malignant bone tumors, scintigraphy with 99mTc-phosphonate disclosed the primary tumor in 44 cases and skeletal metastases in 11, and 67Ga scintigraphy detected the primary tumor in 43 cases, skeletal metastases in 6 cases and soft-tissue metastases in 8 cases. In 25 patients with secondary malignant bone tumors, bone scintigraphy visualized a single lesion in 10 cases and several lesions in 15 cases, and 67Ga scintigraphy detected the primary tumor in 17 cases, skeletal metastases in 17 cases and soft-tissue metastases in 9 cases. In 21 patients with benign bone disease positive uptake of 99mTc-phosphonate was recognized in 19 cases and uptake of 67Ga in 17 cases. It is concluded that bone scintigraphy should be used in patients suspected of primary bone tumors. If malignancy is suspected, 67Ga scintigraphy should be performed in addition.

Comparison of flap reconstruction for soft tissue sarcomas of the foot and ankle

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Mallett ◽  
Matthew T. Houdek ◽  
Rachel L. Honig ◽  
Karim Bakri ◽  
Peter S. Rose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Flap Reconstruction ◽  
Foot And Ankle

scholarly journals Validation of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score as an Outcome Measure as Compared to the revised Foot Function Index (rFFI)

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Bellas ◽  
Carl Cirino ◽  
Mark Cote ◽  
Vinayak Sathe ◽  
Lauren Geaney
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Soft Tissue Trauma ◽  
Foot Function ◽  
Tissue Trauma ◽  
Question Survey

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: Patient reported outcome measures serve as an invaluable tool in both the clinical and research setting to monitor a patient’s condition and efficacy of treatments over time. We aim to validate the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score for disorders of the lower extremity using the revised Foot Function Index (rFFI) as a reference. The rFFI is a validated 34-question survey tool utilized in the evaluation of patients with foot and ankle related pathology [1-4], while the SANE score consists of a patient’s single numerical rating of the status of their extremity [5]. Given its ease of use and prior validation with shoulder pathology, the SANE score has potential as a practical and effective outcome measure in foot and ankle pathology. Methods: Patient age, sex, visit diagnosis by ICD-10 code, SANE score, and FFI score were collected retrospectively from 218 initial patient encounters between January 2015 through July 2017. Patients were included if they were 18 years and older presenting for outpatient evaluation to the University of Connecticut Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Department. Patients were excluded if they had incomplete SANE or rFFI data. The rFFI is a 34-question survey with subscales including pain (7 questions), stiffness (7 questions), activity limitation (3 questions), difficulty (11 questions), and social issues (6 questions). Results of the two scores were compared using the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients with correlation defined as excellent (>0.7), excellent-good (0.61-0.7), good (0.4-0.6), or poor (0.2-0.39) [6]. Diagnoses were categorized into 9 subgroups that were analyzed including: forefoot, plantar fasciitis, arthritis, deformity, fracture, tendinitis, OCD, soft tissue trauma and “other”. Results: The SANE score had good correlation with the overall rFFI score (r=0.51, p<0.001). When comparing the SANE score to the rFFI subscores, there was good correlation with pain (r=0.42, p<0.001), good correlation with stiffness (r=0.44, p<0.001), poor correlation with activity (r=0.36, p<0.001), good correlation with difficulty (r=0.52, p<0.001), and poor correlation with social issues (r=0.39, p<0.001). Sub-analysis showed an excellent to good correlation between SANE and rFFI score for forefoot pathology (r=0.67, p<0.001), “other” pathologies (r=0.65, p<0.001), and plantar fasciitis (r=0.63, p<0.016), good correlation for arthritis (r=0.49, p<0.038), deformity (r=0.60, p<0.010), fracture (r=0.50, p<0.004), and tendinitis (r=0.47, p<0.017), and no significant correlation for OCD of the talus (r=0.56, p<0.145) and soft tissue trauma (r=0.19, p<0.319). Conclusion: The SANE score demonstrates good correlation with the rFFI overall. However, its correlation varies depending on the subscore of the rFFI and the presenting pathology of the patient. The SANE score correlates best with the rFFI pain, stiffness, and difficulty subscore, and poorly with activity and social issues. In addition, the SANE score correlates best with forefoot pathologies, plantar fasciitis, and “other” pathologies but does not correlate with patients presenting for OCD of the talus or soft tissue trauma.

scholarly journals A Review of Applications of MRI in Soft Tissue and Bone Tumors

Orthopedics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-425
Author(s):  
John A Kalmar ◽  
John J Eick ◽  
Christopher R B Merritt ◽  
Stanton E Shuler ◽  
Kenneth D Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Bone Tumors

scholarly journals Ultrasonography of diseases of bone and muscular system

2001 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 260-265
Author(s):  
I. V. Klyushkin ◽  
D. V. Pasynkov ◽  
V. A. Tikhonov ◽  
G. A. Nafikov ◽  
R. R. Tazeev
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Bone Tumors ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Bone Fractures ◽  
Muscular System ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Optimum Application

As many as 1500 patients with various pathology of bone and muscular system were examined. The comparative study of traditional roentgenography, ultrasound examination, computer and magnetoresonance tomography was carried out to determine the optimum application in examining bone and muscular system. In many cases of the bone and muscular system diseases (bone fractures, osteomyelitis, bone tumors, soft tissue fistulas) the ultrasound examination successfully competes with other methods and in some cases, it is the method of choice.

Interdigital vs Transarticular Lateral Release With Scarf Osteotomy

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110353
Author(s):  
Florian Hartenbach ◽  
Brigitta Höger ◽  
Karl-Heinz Kristen ◽  
Hans-Jörg Trnka
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Lateral Release ◽  
Soft Tissue Release ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Aofas Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Scarf Osteotomy ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes

Background: We compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the interdigital approach vs the medial transarticular approach for lateral release combined with scarf osteotomy. Methods: Seventy-seven feet with moderate to severe hallux valgus underwent scarf osteotomy and lateral soft tissue release, using an interdigital approach (n = 36) vs medial transarticular approach (n = 41). The clinical measurements (range of motion, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society [AOFAS] score) and radiographic data were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up (93-124 months postoperatively). Additionally, the numeric pain rating scale and Foot and Ankle Outcome score [FAOS] were assessed postoperatively. Results: The AOFAS score improved from 60 (q1 = 54, q3 = 70) to 93 (q1 = 85, q3 = 98) in the transarticular group, and from 59 (q1 = 50, q3 = 64) to 95 (q1 = 85, q3 = 100) in the interdigital group. The hallux valgus angle improved from 35.7±6.5 degrees to 15.5±7.6 degrees in the transarticular group, and from 36.0±6.8 degrees to 12.9±13.0 degrees in the interdigital group. The intermetatarsal angle improved from 16.5±2.5 degrees to 6.5±2.7 degrees within the transarticular group and from 17.2±2.5 degrees to 7.3±4.3 degrees in the interdigital group. None of the clinical or radiographic parameters showed any significant differences between the treatment groups. Conclusion: Comparison of outcomes between the interdigital approach and the transarticular approach for lateral soft-tissue release with scarf osteotomy are equally successful. The transarticular approach can thus be considered safe and effective, with the additional benefits of just one scar as opposed to 2. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document