Estimates of Capital Stocks for the States and Territories of Australia, 1985-200411An earlier version of this paper was presented at the ‘Lord of the Regions’ Economic and Regional Development Conference, Manukau City, Auckland, New Zealand, 27–30 September 2005. This study is part of a collaborative research project investigating economic and productivity growth among the states of Australia, undertaken by the Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith University, and the Office of Economic and Statistical Research, Queensland Treasury, with financial assistance from the Australian Research Council. Thanks are due to Jimmy Louca, Peter Crossman, Jim Hurley, Mark Upcher and Gudrun Meyer-Boehm for helpful comments. However, the final results do not necessarily reflect the views of any of these individuals, Queensland Treasury, or the Queensland Government. Thanks are also due to Trinh Le who provided us with excellent research assistance, and to two anonymous referees who provided helpful comments.

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
S. Mikhailitchenko ◽  
D.T. Nguyen ◽  
C. Smith
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Regional Development ◽  
Productivity Growth ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Financial Assistance ◽  
Statistical Research ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Australian Research Council ◽  
Excellent Research

scholarly journals Understanding Life Transitions

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Kay Price
Keyword(s):  
Research Council ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Research Unit ◽  
Life Transitions ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Collaborative Project ◽  
Australian Research Council ◽  
School Of Nursing ◽  
Nursing Services

I wanted to share with readers the outcomes of a research project I have been involved with. It was funded by a three-year nationally competitive discovery grant (2003-2005) from the Australian Research Council (ARC [DP 0346092]). This was a collaborative project between the Research Unit, Royal District Nursing Services, South Australia and University of South Australia, School of Nursing and Midwifery.

"What's Your Problem?" ANT Reflections on a Research Project Studying Girls Enrolment in Information Technology Subjects in Postcompulsory Education

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonie Rowan ◽  
Chris Bigum
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Actor Network ◽  
Australian Research Council ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Key Questions

Despite more than 30 years of gender reform in schools, the percentages of girls enrolled in information technology subjects in the post-compulsory years of education has remained persistently low: often under 25%. This article investigates data collected during an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant project (2005-2007) focused on identifying the reasons for this under-representation, and ways in which the situation could be changed. The article looks beyond the official recommendations of the project to explore how the research experience and the data combine to raise important questions about the limits of research in this area. The authors discuss the difference between the researchers’ perception of the problem under consideration, and the participants’ perception of the same issue. They use the resources of actor-network to highlight the gaps, tensions and contradictions within the data and to ask key questions about the extent to which the enrolment of girls in IT is indeed “a problem”.

Australian Management Research: Prospects for the New Millennium

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory R. Elliott
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Management Research ◽  
Australian Research Council ◽  
The Future ◽  
Significant Divergence ◽  
New Millennium

AbstractThis paper is an abridged and revised version of a report that was originally published in the Australian Research Council (ARC) report ‘Management Research in Australia’, jointly funded by the ARC and the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM). It documents the results of a Delphi study into the future of management research in Australia over the coming decade. An important finding was that there might be a ‘shortfall’ between the likely and desirable level and character of Australian management research. A dominant view of the panel was that management research will become more relevant to the needs of its important client groups, including students, government and business. Significant divergence within the respondent panel is also identified.

Australian Management Research: Prospects for the New Millennium

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory R. Elliott
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Management Research ◽  
Australian Research Council ◽  
The Future ◽  
Significant Divergence ◽  
New Millennium

AbstractThis paper is an abridged and revised version of a report that was originally published in the Australian Research Council (ARC) report ‘Management Research in Australia’, jointly funded by the ARC and the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM). It documents the results of a Delphi study into the future of management research in Australia over the coming decade. An important finding was that there might be a ‘shortfall’ between the likely and desirable level and character of Australian management research. A dominant view of the panel was that management research will become more relevant to the needs of its important client groups, including students, government and business. Significant divergence within the respondent panel is also identified.

scholarly journals Quantifying and evaluating research in paramedicine - why our own field of research code matters.

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M Simpson
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Australian Research Council ◽  
First Time ◽  
Significant Milestone ◽  
Research Classification

On 1 June 2020, the Australian Research Council (ARC) released the outcomes of the recent review of the Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC) (1). In what constitutes a significant milestone for paramedicine in Australia and New Zealand, we have been allocated our own paramedicine ‘Field of Research’ (FOR) code for the first time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document