Automatic detection of calcifications in the aorta from abdominal CT scans

2003 ◽  
Vol 1256 ◽  
pp. 1037-1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Išgum ◽  
B van Ginneken ◽  
M.A Viergever
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A82-A83
Author(s):  
Chang Ho Ahn ◽  
Tae Woo Kim ◽  
Kyungmin Jo ◽  
Sung Hye Kong ◽  
Jinhee Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Adrenal nodules are often incidentally detected on abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans due to their asymptomatic nature. We aimed to develop an automatic detection program for adrenal nodules on abdominal CT scans using deep learning algorithms. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed abdominal CT scans performed at two university-affiliated hospitals (n = 483 and n = 514, respectively) from 2006 to 2019. This dataset was randomly divided into training set (181 CTs without adrenal nodule and 362 CTs with adrenal nodule) and test set (291 CTs without adrenal nodule and 163 CTs with adrenal nodule). All CT scans were contrast-enhanced and the phase with the highest contrast between adrenal gland and adjacent normal tissues was selected for multi-phase CT. The core algorithm of our deep learning algorithm for adrenal nodule (DLAAN) was MULAN (Multitask Universal Lesion Analysis Network) algorithm whose backbone was a convolutional neural network. DLAAN was composed of two stages. The first stage was to detect the CT slice where normal adrenal gland or adrenal nodule were located. The second stage was for fine localization of adrenal nodule on the corresponding CT slice. The performance of DLAAN was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for patient-level classification and free-response ROC for nodule-level localization. The figure of merit for free-response ROC was calculated as an average sensitivity when 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 false positives per slice were allowed. Results: The AUROC of DLAAN was 0.927 (95% confidence interval: 0.900–0.955). With a threshold probability of 0.9, the sensitivity and specificity were 86.5% and 89.0%, respectively. When left and right adrenal nodules were analyzed separately, the AUROC was 0.910 for left adrenal nodule and 0.957 for right adrenal nodule, respectively. The accuracy of DLAAN according to the size of adrenal nodule was 0.890, 0.734, 0.981, 1.00 and 1.00 for no adrenal nodule, adrenal nodule sized 1–2 cm, 2–3 cm, 3–4 cm and > 4 cm, respectively. The performance of DLAAN for the localization of adrenal nodule which was estimated by average sensitivity was 0.812. The number of CTs with at least one false positive nodule was 93/454 (20.5%). Conclusion: Our proof of concept study of deep learning-based automatic detection of adrenal nodule on contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans showed high accuracy for both the classification of patients with or without adrenal nodule and the localization of adrenal nodule, although the performance of the algorithm decreased for small sized adrenal nodules. External validation with different CT settings and patient population is needed to assess the generalizability of our algorithm.


Author(s):  
Neta Blau ◽  
Eyal Klang ◽  
Nahum Kiryati ◽  
Marianne Amitai ◽  
Orith Portnoy ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3108
Author(s):  
Jens Kleesiek ◽  
Benedikt Kersjes ◽  
Kai Ueltzhöffer ◽  
Jacob M. Murray ◽  
Carsten Rother ◽  
...  

Modern generative deep learning (DL) architectures allow for unsupervised learning of latent representations that can be exploited in several downstream tasks. Within the field of oncological medical imaging, we term these latent representations “digital tumor signatures” and hypothesize that they can be used, in analogy to radiomics features, to differentiate between lesions and normal liver tissue. Moreover, we conjecture that they can be used for the generation of synthetic data, specifically for the artificial insertion and removal of liver tumor lesions at user-defined spatial locations in CT images. Our approach utilizes an implicit autoencoder, an unsupervised model architecture that combines an autoencoder and two generative adversarial network (GAN)-like components. The model was trained on liver patches from 25 or 57 inhouse abdominal CT scans, depending on the experiment, demonstrating that only minimal data is required for synthetic image generation. The model was evaluated on a publicly available data set of 131 scans. We show that a PCA embedding of the latent representation captures the structure of the data, providing the foundation for the targeted insertion and removal of tumor lesions. To assess the quality of the synthetic images, we conducted two experiments with five radiologists. For experiment 1, only one rater and the ensemble-rater were marginally above the chance level in distinguishing real from synthetic data. For the second experiment, no rater was above the chance level. To illustrate that the “digital signatures” can also be used to differentiate lesion from normal tissue, we employed several machine learning methods. The best performing method, a LinearSVM, obtained 95% (97%) accuracy, 94% (95%) sensitivity, and 97% (99%) specificity, depending on if all data or only normal appearing patches were used for training of the implicit autoencoder. Overall, we demonstrate that the proposed unsupervised learning paradigm can be utilized for the removal and insertion of liver lesions at user defined spatial locations and that the digital signatures can be used to discriminate between lesions and normal liver tissue in abdominal CT scans.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 650-650
Author(s):  
ROBERT SCHLECHTER ◽  
ABRAHAM BESSERMAN

Concerning the use of diatrizoate sodium (Hypaque) in abdominal CT scans described by Kane et al (Pediatrics 1988;82:11-15), we agree that there is certainly much to be gained from CT scanning in blunt abdominal trauma. We question the routine use of diatrizoate sodium in an injured child predisposed to gastric distention and vomiting. This is particularly dangerous when he or she is prone and restrained and close observation at the bedside is not possible. Solid organ injuries are well demonstrated without contrast, and injury to a viscus can be evaluated clinically and by routine roentgenographic procedures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Clayphan ◽  
Anna Fairclough ◽  
Jeff Lim ◽  
Roderick Alexander

Abstract Aims Acute Bowel Obstruction (ABO) accounts for 10% of emergency surgical admissions and when surgery is required mortality can exceed 10%. Early diagnosis is associated with improved patient outcomes and timely acquisition of abdominal CT scans can help prevent delays. The NCEPOD 2020 report on ABO identified ‘delays in imaging’ as a key area for improvement in the care of these patients, with these delays being exacerbated if an abdominal X-ray (AXR) was performed as well as an abdominal CT. This study looks at ways to expedite the diagnosis of patients presenting with ABO.   Methods A retrospective audit of 77 patients admitted from A&E or SAU with ABO from April 2019 to February 2020 was conducted. Imaging modality, time-to-CT scan and time-to-diagnosis was recorded. Results and recommendations were presented locally and an evidence based ABO care pathway was implemented and publicised. 20 patients were audited prospectively, post care pathway implementation.  Results 70.1% of patients from the initial audit received a CT-scan and 42% of these patients received an AXR before their eventual CT-scan. The average wait for a definitive radiological diagnosis was 27.8hr. After implementation of the pathway only 18% of patients audited received both modes of imaging and the average time to diagnosis has been reduced to 10.7hr.  Conclusions Raising awareness of the appropriate and timely use of CT-scans in the diagnosis of ABO has reduced the number of concomitant AXR for these patients, expediting the making of a definitive diagnosis and improving patient outcomes. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 164 (9) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bansari Shah ◽  
Charmi Sawla ◽  
Shraddha Bhanushali ◽  
Poonam Bhogale

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 668-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.Tobias Nagurney ◽  
David F.M Brown ◽  
Robert A Novelline ◽  
Jennifer Kim ◽  
Randy H Fischer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document