scholarly journals THE CLOSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DRUG INTOLERANCE AND MAJOR CARDIAC AND CEREBROVASCULAR EVENTS AFTER AN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME OR CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Sara Doimo ◽  
Stefano Albani ◽  
Alessandro Altinier ◽  
Patrizia Maras ◽  
Giulia Barbati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Drug Intolerance ◽  
Cerebrovascular Events ◽  
Close Relationship

scholarly journals HIV Infection and Long‐Term Residual Cardiovascular Risk After Acute Coronary Syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Boccara ◽  
Murielle Mary‐Krause ◽  
Valérie Potard ◽  
Emmanuel Teiger ◽  
Sylvie Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
First Episode ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
Hiv Patients ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cerebrovascular Events

Background It is unclear whether HIV infection affects the long‐term prognosis after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The objective of the current study was to compare rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after a first ACS between people living with HIV (PLHIV) and HIV‐uninfected (HIV−) patients, and to identify determinants of cardiovascular prognosis. Methods and Results Consecutive PLHIV and matched HIV− patients with a first episode of ACS were enrolled in 23 coronary intensive care units in France. Patients were matched for age, sex, and ACS type. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (cardiac death, recurrent ACS, recurrent coronary revascularization, and stroke) at 36‐month follow‐up. A total of 103 PLHIV and 195 HIV− patients (mean age, 49 years [SD, 9 years]; 94.0% men) were included. After a mean of 36.6 months (SD, 6.1 months) of follow‐up, the risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was not statistically significant between PLHIV and HIV− patients (17.8% and 15.1%, P =0.22; multivariable hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% CI, 0.67–3.82 [ P =0.29]). Recurrence of ACS was more frequent among PLHIV (multivariable HR, 6.31; 95% CI, 1.32–30.21 [ P =0.02]). Stratified multivariable Cox models showed that HIV infection was the only independent predictor for ACS recurrence. PLHIV were less likely to stop smoking (47% versus 75%; P =0.01) and had smaller total cholesterol decreases (–22.3 versus –35.0 mg/dL; P =0.04). Conclusions Although the overall risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was not statistically significant between PLHIV and HIV− individuals, PLHIV had a higher rate of recurrent ACS. Registration URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT00139958.

Abstract 378: Using Lean Methodology to Reduce Variation in Care of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Fradet ◽  
Carol Laberge ◽  
Andrew Kmetic ◽  
Ronnalea Hamman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Regional Variation ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Process Of Care ◽  
Patient Journey ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Decision Points

Background: Regional variation in the utilization of health services is a well-documented phenomenon in health care with numerous studies reporting substantial and unexplained variations in coronary revascularization. In the Canadian province of British Columbia (BC), five cardiac centers provide coronary revascularization services. In 2011 Cardiac Services BC (CSBC) undertook a study that identified substantial regional variation in coronary revascularization that could not be explained by patient characteristics or risk factors. Following this initial project, CSBC launched an initiative to help better understand the regional variations and possibly devise and implement strategies to reduce them. To get a better understanding of the different processes of care/utilization, one of the approaches used is the application of Lean methodology to the care of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Methods: Lean methodology is being applied to the patient journey of ACS patients. At each revascularization center Value Steam Maps process maps (VSM) are being prepared through a series of meetings with support, frontline, administrative and clinical staff (see attached example). For each VSM the goal is to identify key decision points in the process of care for ACS patients and to drill down on (Root Cause Analysis) on the decision making environment and criteria used to determine the utilization of coronary revascularization services. Once VSM have been completed they will be compared across sites for similarities and differences. The differences in decision making will then be assessed to determine their effect on variation in utilization across the centers. Discussion: BC is attempting to reduce unexplained variation in coronary revascularization using the Lean methodology to take a systematic approach to the analysis of the process of ACS care across the province. The next step will be to determine to what extent it is possible to standardize decision making at the key decision points across the HAs. Standardization will be achieved through a mix of best practices, evidence and application of guidelines. While the undertaking is still in the early stages it is expected that it will lead to, at the very least, ACS patients receiving the same care regardless of where they receive their care in BC.

Coronary revascularization in acute coronary syndrome: does the choice of the conduit matter?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmin. H. SHAHINIAN ◽  
Mertan GÜRLEYEN ◽  
Marlon GRODD ◽  
Martin WOLKEWITZ ◽  
Friedhelm BEYERSDORF ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Abstract TP314: Baseline Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Does it Affect Following Cerebrovascular Event Rates?

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiehju Chao ◽  
Chiachun Chiang ◽  
Muhammad Khalid ◽  
David Fortuin
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cerebrovascular Event ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cerebrovascular Events ◽  
Event Rates ◽  
And Control

Introduction: Baseline thrombocytopenia (TP) is a common condition in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and acute ischemic stroke and has been shown to increase mortality. The effect of baseline TP on cerebrovascular events following initial ACS event is not well studied. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients identified from the institutional NCDR Chest Pain registry database at Mayo Clinic Arizona from Oct 2015 to Sep 2018. Patients were classified into TP (platelet <150) and control (platelet > 150) groups for clinical outcome (stroke/TIA and bleeding events) analysis. P-value < 0.05 is considered significant. Results: Five hundred and thirty-six patients were included for final analysis. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes are shown in Table 1. The rates of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) prescription at discharge (TP vs. control: 68.1% and 75.4%, P=0.197), stroke/TIA (1.3% vs. 2.4%, P=1.000) and recurrent myocardial infarction (11.1% vs. 11.2%, P=1.000) were similar between the two groups. The TP group has more bleeding events compared to control (Figure 1). Conclusions: In patients with ACS, baseline TP does not affect stroke/TIA events but is associated with higher bleeding rate. The results could not be explained by the DAPT or anticoagulation use alone. Further studies are needed to investigate the pathophysiologic correlation of thrombocytopenia, DAPT, and stroke in ACS patients.

P5524Influence of bundle branch block in the long-term outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Garcia Acuna ◽  
A Cordero Fort ◽  
A Martinez ◽  
P Antunez ◽  
M Perez Dominguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Abstract The new European Society of Cardiology guideline for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction recommends that left and right bundle branch block should be considered equal for recommending urgent angiography in patients with suspected myocardial infarction. This consideration is not taken into account in the management of patients with coronary syndrome without ST elevation (NSTEMI). We evaluate the evolution of patients with acute coronary syndrome and long-term bundle branch block. Patients and methods We included 8771 patients admitted to two tertiary hospitals between 2003 and 2017 with an acute coronary syndrome, 5673 NSTEMI (64.3%) and 3098 STEMI (35.7%). All patients had an ECG recorded immediately upon admission. Patients were classified as having right bundle branch block (RBBB), left bundle branch block (LBBB). Long-term follow-up was performed (median 55 months) to assess mortality. Results A total of 8771 patients were included with a mean age of 66.1 years, 72.5% males, 4.1% (362) with LBBB and 5% (440) with RBBB. Patients with BBB were older, with more previous history of myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization and higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Medical treatment was similar but they were less often submitted to angioplasty. During the acute phase, patients with RBBB and LBBB presented a higher rate of heart failure than those without branch block (4.8% vs 9.1% vs 3.5%, p=0.0001); higher mortality (8.4% vs 10.5% vs 3.0%, p=0.0001); higher stroke rate (2.5% vs 1.4% vs 0.8%, p=0.001); higher rate of renal failure (8.2% vs 9.7% vs 3.9%, p=0.0001) and higher rate of reinfarction (3.0% vs 4.1% vs 1.7%, p=0.001). Patients who had a RBBB or an LBBB had a worse prognosis throughout the follow-up. Heart failure was present in 17.7% of the group with RBBB, 29.6% of LBBB and 11% in the group without branch block (p=0.0001). Mortality during follow-up was 31% in RBBB, 40.6% in LBBB and 18.7% without branch block (p=0.0001). In multivariate analysis of Cox, both RBBB (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23–1.98, p=0.0001) and LBBB (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.22–1.53, p=0.001) were an independent predictors of all-cause mortality (adjustment for GRACE score, gender, treatment with betablockers, angiotensin conversor enzym inhibitors, statin and coronary revascularization). Cox regression model multivariate Conclusions The presence of RBBB or LBBB in the ECG of patients with an ACS is associated with a worse prognosis both during the hospital phase and in the long term. In addition, both bundle branch blocks are independent predictors of long-term mortality in patients with ACS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document