The brief anxiety and depression scale (BADS) in Turkish elderly patients with major depression

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. S386 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Bilgin-Kapucu ◽  
G. Cetinkol ◽  
C. Aydemir ◽  
G. Bastug ◽  
E. Cobanoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Depression ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Anxiety And Depression

Comparison of PROMIS Anxiety and Depression, PHQ-8, and GAD-7 to screen for anxiety and depression among patients presenting for spine surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 524-531
Author(s):  
Taylor E. Purvis ◽  
Brian J. Neuman ◽  
Lee H. Riley ◽  
Richard L. Skolasky
Keyword(s):  
Major Depression ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Generalized Anxiety ◽  
Cut Points ◽  
Patient Reported

OBJECTIVEIn this paper, the authors demonstrate to spine surgeons the prevalence and severity of anxiety and depression among patients presenting for surgery and explore the relationships between different legacy and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) screening measures.METHODSA total of 512 adult spine surgery patients at a single institution completed the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7), 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) depression scale, and PROMIS Anxiety and Depression computer-adaptive tests (CATs) preoperatively. Correlation coefficients were calculated between PROMIS scores and GAD-7 and PHQ-8 scores. Published reference tables were used to determine the presence of anxiety or depression using GAD-7 and PHQ-8. Sensitivity and specificity of published guidance on the PROMIS Anxiety and Depression CATs were compared. Guidance from 3 sources was compared: published GAD-7 and PHQ-8 crosswalk tables, American Psychiatric Association scales, and expert clinical consensus. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to determine data-driven cut-points for PROMIS Anxiety and Depression. Significance was accepted as p < 0.05.RESULTSIn 512 spine surgery patients, anxiety and depression were prevalent preoperatively (5% with any anxiety, 24% with generalized anxiety screen-positive; and 54% with any depression, 24% with probable major depression). Correlations were moderately strong between PROMIS Anxiety and GAD-7 scores (r = 0.72; p < 0.001) and between PROMIS Depression and PHQ-8 scores (r = 0.74; p < 0.001). The observed correlation of the PROMIS Depression score was greater with the PHQ-8 cognitive/affective score (r = 0.766) than with the somatic score (r = 0.601) (p < 0.001). PROMIS Anxiety and Depression CATs were able to detect the presence of generalized anxiety screen-positive (sensitivity, 86.0%; specificity, 81.6%) and of probable major depression (sensitivity, 82.3%; specificity, 81.4%). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated data-driven cut-points for these groups.CONCLUSIONSPROMIS Anxiety and Depression CATs are reliable tools for identifying generalized anxiety screen-positive spine surgery patients and those with probable major depression.

Which is the optimal depression rating scale for psychiatrists? a diagnostic validity comparison of hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and psychiatric judgement against the MINI

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 599-599
Author(s):  
Z. Al-Salihy ◽  
T. Rahim ◽  
A. Mitchell ◽  
M. Mahmud ◽  
A. Muhyaldin
Keyword(s):  
Major Depression ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Epidemiologic Study ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Hospital Anxiety ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Symptoms Of Depression ◽  
Higher Sensitivity

IntroductionUstun et al estimated that depression is the fourth leading cause of global disease burden. The burden of depression on the healthcare system is equally significant with an estimated US annual cost of approximately $26 billion (1990). In a European epidemiologic study of mental disorders involving six countries, major depression was the single most common disorder assessed, with a 12-month prevalence of 3.9%.ObjectivesOur aim was to find the optimal tool with the highest accuracy in comparison to the (MINI) for depression.AimsWe aimed to find the depression rating scale with the highest accuracy when applied by psychiatrists in Iraq.MethodsWe recruited 400 subjects; The (MINI) was used as a gold standard to define the presence of major depression according to DSMIV criteria stratified into 200 patients with primary depression and 200 non-depressed subjects in Kurdistan region of Iraq. We examined the symptoms of depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI). Interviews were performed by three psychiatrists who were blinded to the group allocations. ROC curve analysis was used.ResultsBoth HADS and CGI performed with high accuracy compared with the MINI interview for DSMIV major depression. Clinicians using the CGI were accurate in their clinical judgement with sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 99%.ConclusionsWe found the psychiatrist's opinion alone was very accurate with higher sensitivity and specificity than the HADS and therefore it is unclear from our sample if questionnaires would help clinicians in their diagnoses.

Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for use with multiple sclerosis patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1518-1524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimia Honarmand ◽  
Anthony Feinstein
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Major Depression ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Hospital Anxiety ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Roc Area ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Detecting clinically significant symptoms of depression and anxiety in medically ill patients using self-report rating scales presents a challenge because of somatic confounders. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was developed with this in mind, but has never been validated for a multiple sclerosis population. Our objective was to validate the HADS for multiple sclerosis patients. Multiple sclerosis patients were interviewed for the presence of major depression ( n = 180) and anxiety disorders ( n = 140) with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was undertaken to assess which HADS cut-off scores give the best yield with respect to diagnoses of major depression and all anxiety disorders defined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. A threshold score of 8 or greater on the HADS depression subscale provides a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 87.3% (ROC area under the curve 0.938). The same cut-off score gives a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 80.7% on the anxiety subscale (ROC area under the curve 0.913), but for generalized anxiety disorder only. The study confirms the usefulness of the HADS as a marker of major depression and generalized anxiety disorder, but not other anxiety disorders, in multiple sclerosis patients.

Anxiety and Depression among Elderly Hemodialyzed Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S649-S650
Author(s):  
R. Feki ◽  
D. Trigui ◽  
I. Abida ◽  
I. Baati ◽  
R. Sellami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Failure ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Kidney Failure ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Chronic Kidney Failure ◽  
School Level ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Psychosocial Burden ◽  
The Mean

IntroductionThe haemodialysis, one of the main treatment modalities of chronic renal failure, imposes a great psychosocial burden on elderly patients, which may cause many psychological impacts.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to screen anxiety and depression in elderly patients on haemodialysis, taking into account factors that may contribute to.MethodsOur study was transversal, descriptive carried out among 38 elderly patients aged more than 60 years with chronic kidney failure on haemodialysis. The structured questionnaire used in this study was gathered information on socio-demographic and disease characteristics. We used the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) to access anxiety and depression.ResultsThe mean age of our sample was 71 years. The sex-ratio (♂/♀) was 1.92.,patients were mainly married (73.7%), and have a low school level (76.3%). The mean haemodialysis duration was 5 years ± 4.68. The most common cause of renal failure was polycystic kidney disease (18.4%), diabetes (15.8%), while in 28.9% the cause was unknown. Anxiety was found in 18.4% of patients and it was associated with both low school (P = 0.02) and socio-economic level (P = 0.04). The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 42.1%. It was correlated to the unknown cause of kidney failure and the short duration haemodialysis (P = 0.03).ConclusionThese data suggest that depression and anxiety are highly prevalent in elderly patients with renal failure on dialysis. This result shows the need for interdisciplinary teamwork in improving the quality of life of those patients.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document