Evaluation of the Ferraris pocket peak flow meter for the measurement of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)

1992 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 525-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.M. Nolan ◽  
S.M. Dornelly ◽  
D.T. Hughes ◽  
L. Strunin
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 388-391
Author(s):  
Aditi Tanna ◽  
Sambhaji B. Gunjal

Background: In this era of globalization one of the growing industries is the construction industry and there are various occupational problems faced by the workers especially in Asian countries mostly in India; the problems are related to both physical and mental health. All the construction sites generate high concentration of dust particles from cement, silica, asbestos, concrete, wood, stand and stand that causes respiratory problems in the workers. PEFR is the maximum air that is generated after forceful expiration, after full lung inspiration. So if there is any accumulation of dust particles the PEFR decreases as the elasticity of lungs to recoil is distrusted due to the lodged particles. Material and Method: A descriptive observation study was carried out on 50 building construction workers. The purpose of the study was explained and informed consent was taken. The PEFR was measured using peak expiratory flow meter. The data was analyzed using standard statistical software. Result: The procedure of using peak flow meter that was carried out for 3 times and the highest value from the three was considered as peak flow rate, using statistical method mean and standard deviation were calculated. The mean of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate is 321.1 L/min. Conclusion: This study concluded that the peak expiratory flow rate is reduced in building construction workers those who are working for than 2 years on the construction sites. Key words: construction workers, occupation diseases, PEFR, peak expiratory flow meter.


1980 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 731-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G Prior ◽  
G M Cochrane

Home-monitoring of peak expiratory flow rate using the mini-Wright peak flow meter is a useful technique for determining whether or not unexplained respiratory symptoms are caused by asthma. It is of particular value when airflow obstruction cannot be demonstrated at the time of consultation.


Author(s):  
Sanjay Bansal ◽  
VK Tiwari ◽  
Sahil Sood ◽  
Rajan Shukla

ABSTRACT Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) is a simple, reliable, and easily reproducible and measurable lung function test. It has not been formally assessed whether the PEFR values measured with peak flow meter are in close correlation with the values measured by digital spirometer. The present study is carried out to determine whether there is a significant difference between the PEFR values derived from digital spirometer and peak flow meter in patients with respiratory symptoms. How to cite this article Tiwari VK, Bansal S, Sood S, Kumar A, Shukla R. Comparative Evaluation of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate between Computerized Spirometry and Peak Flow Meter. Int J Adv Integ Med Sci 2016;1(3):93-94.


1992 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 717-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Peiffer ◽  
M. Toumi ◽  
H. Razzouk ◽  
J. Marsac ◽  
A. Lockhart

1. As marked lability of bronchial obstruction is a risk factor for asthma severity, it may influence dyspnoea, the most common subjective complaint in asthma. We therefore studied the relationship between spontaneous dyspnoea and the degree of bronchial lability, as assessed by the daily variability in peak expiratory flow rate and the bronchial responsiveness to either carbachol or salbutamol, in 33 stable symptomatic asthmatic patients. 2. Three times daily, for 10 consecutive days, the patients rated the intensity of their dyspnoea on a visual analogue scale and immediately afterwards recorded their peak expiratory flow rate. Within the next 5 days, we determined the bronchial response by measuring the forced expiratory volume in 1 s and the specific resistance of airways to either carbachol or salbutamol according to baseline airway obstruction. 3. We characterized dyspnoea for each patient by using two parameters: (1) the relationship with underlying airway obstruction, as assessed by the correlation coefficient r between dyspnoea scores and corresponding values of peak expiratory flow rate (r DSc-PEFR), and (2) the intensity, as assessed by the mean visual analogue scale dyspnoea score adjusted for comparable airway obstruction. Bronchial lability was characterized by (1) variability in mean daily peak expiratory flow rate and (2) bronchial responsiveness to either carbachol (as assessed by the threshold dose and the slope of the dose-response curve) or salbutamol (as assessed by the threshold dose and maximal response). We assessed the relationship between dyspnoea and bronchial lability by correlating each of their respective characteristics. 4. We found large inter-subject differences in both characteristics of dyspnoea, r DSc-PEFR was unrelated to variability in mean daily peak expiratory flow rate and to all characteristics of bronchial responsiveness used, except for maximal salbutamol-induced increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (as a percentage of predicted). Adjusted visual analogue scale dyspnoea scores were unrelated to all characteristics of bronchial lability. 5. Our results suggest that spontaneous dyspnoea, as characterized by its intensity at comparable levels of airway obstruction and by its relationship with underlying airway obstruction, is poorly related to the degree of bronchial lability in stable symptomatic asthmatic patients.


1982 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 73-74 ◽  

Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF) is a simple and reproducible indicator of ventilatory function.1 It is the maximal airflow sustained for at least 10 msec during a forced expiration after deep inspiration. PEF is easy to measure with the Wright Peak Flow Minimeter. Results from this simple lightweight instrument correlate well with those from the older, bigger model.2 Predicted values vary with age, sex and height in adults;3,4 in children they are related to height alone.4,5 It is usual to record the best of three readings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document