Conservative treatment of breast cancer: 20-year results boosting the tumor bed by brachytherapy

2001 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. S186-S187
Author(s):  
B. Guix ◽  
I. Henríquez ◽  
F. Finestres ◽  
A. Martínez ◽  
J.I. Tello ◽  
...  
1993 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregorio Moro ◽  
Emanuele Ciambellotti

Aims and backgrounds This paper describes the evaluation of a personal series of 106 breast cancer patients, aged 28-75 years (average, 54), treated between 1988 and 1971, to determine the success of a conservative protocol proposed as a means of combining radicality with a better cosmetic result, less alteration of the body image and an improved quality of life. Methods All the patients were operated with quadrantectomy and excision of axillary lymph nodes, followed by radiotherapy: 50 Gy to the whole breast plus 10 Gy on the tumor bed (boost irradiation). Adjuvant hormone and/or chemotherapy was also administered in 71/106 cases. The mean follow-up was 22.3 months. Cosmetic assessment was subjective and objective (asymmetry, loss of volume, retraction). All patients were photographed. Results The subjective judgements were: excellent 79, satisfactory 25, and poor 2, compared with objective assessments of 72, 20 and 14, respectively. Patients with poor esthetic results were almost all either T2 or treated with chemotherapy. Conclusions Conservative treatment of breast cancer using integrated irradiation and surgery can therefore attain the required objective of eradication of the cancer while maintaining a satisfactory esthetic and therefore good psychologic outcome.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 4605-4617
Author(s):  
Aly Mahmoud El-Hdidy

Comparisons between three different techniques by which the boost dose was delivered to the tumor bed were carried out , aiming to present the best technique of treatment for right breast cancer patients.In this study, ten right sided breast cancer computed tomography (CT) scans were selected for ten early right breast cancer patients. We made three different treatment plans for each patient CT using three different irradiation techniques to deliver a prescribed boost dose of 10 Gy in 5 fractions to the boost PTV. In the first technique, two tangential photon beams were used, in the second technique we, two oblique photon beams were used and in the third technique, a single electron beam was used. The comparative analyses between the three techniques were performed by comparing the boost PTV- dose volume histograms (DVHs), the ipsilateral breast (right breast) DVHs, the ipsilateral lung (right lung) DVHs and the heart DVHs of the three techniques for each patient. Furthermore the dose that covering 100% , 95% of the volume (D100% , D95%) and the volume covered by 95% of the dose (V95%)of  the boost PTV of all techniques, were calculated for each patient to investigate the dose coverage of the target.Results showed that there were variations of the dose received by tumor bed, right breast and OARs depending on the technique used and the target location and size. A decrease of D100% than 90% of the prescribed dose was observed with the 3rd technique for patients 8, 9 and 10, and was observed with the 2nd technique for patient 5. A reduction of right breast dose was observed when the 3rd technique was use in comparison with the 1st and the 2nd techniques for patients 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8.  Also reduction of right breast was observed when the 2nd technique used in comparison with 1st technique. An increase of lung dose was observed with the 3rd technique for patients 1, 2, 5 and 6, also was observed with 2nd technique in patient 3, 5 and 7. A decrease of lung dose was observed with the 1st technique for patients 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9An individualized treatment, several plans using different irradiation techniques should be developed for each patient individually to reach the best boost PTV dose coverage with minimal OARs’ dose. 


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e035337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost Wolfs ◽  
Jop Beugels ◽  
Merel Kimman ◽  
Andrzej A Piatkowski de Grzymala ◽  
Esther Heuts ◽  
...  

IntroductionEarly breast cancer detection and advancements in treatment options have resulted in an increase of breast cancer survivors. An increasing number of women are living with the long-term effects of breast cancer treatment, making the quality of survivorship an increasingly important goal. Breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) is one of the most underestimated complications of breast cancer treatment with a reported incidence of 20%. A microsurgical technique called lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) might be a promising treatment modality for patients with BCRL. The main objective is to assess whether LVA is more effective than the current standard therapy (conservative treatment) in terms of improvement in quality of life and weather it is cost-effective.Methods and analysisA multicentre, randomised controlled trial, carried out in two academic and two community hospitals in the Netherlands. The study population includes 120 women over the age of 18 who have undergone treatment for breast cancer including axillary treatment (sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection) and/or axillary radiotherapy, presenting with an early stage lymphoedema of the arm, viable lymphatic vessels and received at least 3 months conservative treatment. Sixty participants will undergo the LVA operation and the other sixty will continue their regular conservative treatment, both with a follow-up of 24 months. The primary outcome is the health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes are societal costs, quality adjusted life years, cost-effectiveness ratio, discontinuation rate of conservative treatment and excess limb volume.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Maastricht University Medical Center (METC) on 19 December 2018 (NL67059.068.18). The results of this study will be disseminated in presentations at academic conferences, publications in peer-reviewed journals and other news media.Trial registration numberNCT02790021; Pre-results.


2010 ◽  
Vol 147 (5) ◽  
pp. e305-e315 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Malka ◽  
R. Villet ◽  
A. Fitoussi ◽  
R.-J. Salmon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document