353 Assessment of Circulating Tumor Cells and Serum Markers for Progression-free Survival Prediction in Metastatic Breast Cancer: a Prospective Observational Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S146
Author(s):  
J.Y. Pierga ◽  
D. Hajage ◽  
T. Bachelot ◽  
S. Delaloge ◽  
E. Brain ◽  
...  
Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (54) ◽  
pp. 92483-92496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Benezeder ◽  
Verena Tiran ◽  
Alexandra A.N. Treitler ◽  
Christoph Suppan ◽  
Christopher Rossmann ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yauheni A. Shliakhtunou ◽  
Valery M. Siamionau ◽  
Vyacheslau V. Pobyarzhin

The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and their transcriptional phenotype in relation to overall and progression-free survival in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. The presence of CTCs was studied before the start of special antitumor treatment and after its completion in 102 patients with primary non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) stage I–IIIC. The statistically significant increase in PFS in the group of patients without CTCs before the start of the treatment was established in 89.2 (87.9–92.4 confidence interval (CI) 95%) versus 79.9 (77.6–82.2 CI 95%) in the group with CTCs before treatment at p Log-Rank=0.01. The presence of CTCs expressing ABC transporter superfamily genes in the peripheral blood statistically significantly reduces the values of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Three-year OS was 79.2 (77.1–82.3 CI 95%), and 90.8 (87.4–91.9 CI 95%) without the expression with p Log-Rank=0.04. The presence of circulating tumor cells expressing BIRC5 and HER2-neu genes, and ABC transporter genes, before the initiation of special treatment and the preservation of CTCs after the completion of adjuvant anticancer therapy are independent risk predictors of disease recurrence.


Author(s):  
Pavani Chalasani ◽  
Kiah Farr ◽  
Vicky Wu ◽  
Isaac Jenkins ◽  
Alex Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Treatment options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. In a phase III trial, eribulin demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival compared to treatment of physician’s choice, but had limited tolerability because of neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. Based on prior studies of alternative treatment schedules with other therapies, we hypothesized that a low-dose metronomic schedule of eribulin would permit patients to remain on treatment more consistently without treatment delays, resulting in longer time to progression, and improved toxicity profile. Methods We conducted a multi-site single arm, phase II trial patients with MBC. All patients were treated with metronomic eribulin (0.9 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.) Treatment was continued until the patient developed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or chose to stop the study. Patients must have had prior taxane exposure. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary end points were overall survival, response rate, and clinical benefit rate. Exploratory biomarkers were performed to analyze change in levels of circulating endothelial cells (CECs), circulating endothelial precursors, and carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) with response to therapy. Findings We consented 86 patients and 59 were evaluable for final analysis. Median age was 59 years; 78% had HER2 negative tumors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months with overall survival (OS) of 14.3 months. Objective response rate was 15% with clinical benefit rate of 48%. Reported grade 3 neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were 18% and 5%, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was seen in 3% of patients. Interpretation Metronomic weekly low-dose eribulin is an active and tolerable regimen with significantly less myelosuppression, alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy than is seen with the approved dose and schedule, allowing longer duration of use and disease control, with similar outcomes compared to the standard dose regimen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document