Intermittent dosing of RMC-4630, a potent, selective inhibitor of SHP2, combined with the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib, in a phase 1b/2 clinical trial for advanced solid tumors with activating mutations of RAS signaling

2020 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. S8-S9 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bendell ◽  
S. Ulahannan ◽  
M. Koczywas ◽  
J. Brahmer ◽  
A. Capasso ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A449-A449
Author(s):  
Steven O’Day ◽  
Cesar Perez ◽  
Trisha Wise-Draper ◽  
Glenn Hanna ◽  
Shailender Bhatia ◽  
...  

BackgroundSpherical nucleic acids (SNAs) are nanostructures consisting of radially oriented, densely packed oligonucleotides arranged in a spherical 3D architecture. SNAs have different properties than linear oligonucleotides, including increased cellular uptake, which may enhance efficacy. Cavrotolimod (AST-008) is an SNA toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist designed to robustly activate innate and adaptive immune responses. Cavrotolimod is in development for the treatment of advanced solid tumors in combination with PD-1 blockade. Prior studies demonstrated that cavrotolimod, alone and in combination with PD-1 blockade, increased circulating levels of Th1-type cytokines and activated peripheral T cells and NK cells.MethodsAST-008-102 is an ongoing Phase 1b/2 study (NCT03684785). The Phase 1b dose escalation stage examined intratumoral (IT) cavrotolimod at doses of 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cavrotolimod was dosed once weekly for 8 weeks and once every 3 weeks thereafter. The Phase 2 dose expansion stage is examining cavrotolimod 32 mg IT in combination with IV pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) and in combination with IV cemiplimab for the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Both cohorts are enrolling patients with documented progression of disease on PD-(L)1 blockade. This analysis provides interim results of the Phase 1b stage.ResultsIn the Phase 1b stage, 20 patients were enrolled across all planned dose levels. No dose-limiting toxicities, grade (G)4 toxicities, or treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) were observed. The most common AEs were injection site reactions (ISRs) and flu-like symptoms. All treatment-related AEs were < G3 except agitation and ISR (1 each). At data cutoff, ORR is 21% (4 of 19 evaluable patients) in a heterogeneous population with solid tumors. All 4 responders (2 melanoma and 2 MCC patients) have ongoing responses, with duration of response exceeding 52 weeks in 2 patients. Three of 4 responders had disease progression on PD-1 blockade at the time of enrollment, and one patient had a prior response to PD-1 blockade, but subsequently relapsed off therapy. Regression of both injected and noninjected lesions was observed. Gene expression analyses demonstrated increased IT infiltration by cytotoxic immune cells in both injected and noninjected tumors. The highest dose (32 mg) was selected for the Phase 2 stage.ConclusionsIT administration of cavrotolimod appears to be safe and well tolerated in combination with pembrolizumab. Durable responses have occurred in patients previously experiencing progressive disease on PD-1 blockade.Trial RegistrationNCT03684785Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Institutional Review Boards of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (IRB #18-584), John Wayne Cancer Institute (WIRB #20183064), University of Miami (IRB #20180957), University of Iowa (IRB #201810763), University of Cincinnati (WIRB #20183064), University of Washington (WIRB #20183064), MSKCC (IRB #20-174), UC San Francisco (WIRB #20183064), U Colorado (WIRB #20183064), Northwestern (IRB #STU00211083), U Arizona (WIRB #20183064), UC Irvine (WIRB #20183064), U Pitt (WIRB #20183064), and Washington University (WIRB #20183064).


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A291-A291
Author(s):  
Jean-Laurent Deville ◽  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
Marco Maruzzo ◽  
Theodore Gourdin ◽  
Michele Maio ◽  
...  

BackgroundAvelumab is an anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of advanced UC after disease progression during or following platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance treatment in patients whose disease has not progressed with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.1–3 M9241 is an immunocytokine composed of 2 heterodimers of IL-12 fused to the heavy chains of a human antibody targeting DNA released from necrotic tumor cells.4 During dose-escalation, avelumab + M9241 was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, including 2 objective responses in patients with UC.5 We report on an interim analysis of efficacy and safety from the dose-expansion part of JAVELIN IL-12 (NCT02994953).MethodsEligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic UC that had progressed on first-line therapy, were aged =18 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and were immune checkpoint inhibitor naive. Patients received the recommended phase 2 dose5 of avelumab 800 mg intravenously once weekly (QW) in combination with M9241 16.8 µg/kg subcutaneously Q4W for the first 12 weeks, then continued the combination with avelumab Q2W. The primary endpoints were confirmed best overall response (BOR) per investigator assessment (RECIST 1.1) and safety. The expansion cohort followed a 2-stage design. During stage 1 (single-arm part of the study), 16 patients were enrolled and treated. A futility analysis based on BOR was planned to determine if stage 2 (randomized controlled part of the study) would be initiated.ResultsAt data cut-off (Jun 3, 2020), 16 patients had received avelumab + M9241 for a median duration of 8 weeks (range, 4.0–25.0 weeks). No complete or partial responses were observed; the study failed to meet the criterion (>2 responders) to initiate stage 2. Two patients (12.5%) had stable disease, 13 (81.3%) had progressive disease, and 1 (6.3%) was not evaluable. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 15 patients (93.8%); the most common (in =4 patients) were pyrexia (50.0%), nausea (37.5%), asthenia (31.3%), anemia (25.0%), and hyperthermia (25.0%); grade 4 gamma-glutamyltransferase increased occurred in 1 patient (6.3%). No TRAEs led to death. Pharmacodynamic effects on the peripheral immune system and results of pharmacokinetic and biomarker analyses will also be reported.ConclusionsThe predefined efficacy criterion to proceed to stage 2 was not met. The combination was well tolerated; no new safety signals emerged and the profile was consistent with the dose-escalation part of the study.5Trial RegistrationNCT02994953Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by each site’s independent ethics committee.ConsentN/AReferencesBavencio(avelumab) injection [package insert]. Rockland, MA: EMD Serono, Inc; New York, NY: Pfizer Inc; 2020.Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada.html. Accessed July 31, 2020.US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves avelumab for urothelial carcinoma maintenance treatment. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/fda-approves-avelumab-urothelial-carcinoma-maintenance-treatment. Accessed July 31, 2020.Fallon J, Tighe R, Kradjian G, et al. The immunocytokine NHS-IL12 as a potential cancer therapeutic. Oncotarget. 2014;5:1869–1884.Strauss J, Vugmeyster Y, Sznol M, et al. Phase 1b, open-label, dose escalation study of M9241 (NHS-IL12) plus avelumab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(5 Suppl):Abstract 4062.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 432-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Karim A. Benhadji ◽  
Grace K. Dy ◽  
Gerald Fetterly ◽  
Wen Wee Ma ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556
Author(s):  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Patricia LoRusso ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
Christopher T. Chen ◽  
Yvan LeBruchec ◽  
...  

2556 Background: Depletion of tumor-infiltrating CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), which inhibit tumor-specific immune responses, could contribute to tumor eradication. Cami (ADCT-301), an anti-CD25, pyrrolobenzodiazepine-based antibody-drug conjugate, targets CD25+ Tregs. A mouse surrogate has shown potent antitumor activity in solid tumor models. Here we report preliminary data from the monotherapy arm of a phase 1b trial of Cami in pts with selected advanced solid tumors. Methods: The monotherapy dose-escalation part of this open-label study enrolled pts (aged ≥18 years) with selected advanced solid tumors and no suitable existing therapy. The primary objective was to characterize safety and tolerability, and to identify the recommended phase 2 dose of Cami monotherapy. Secondary and exploratory objectives included evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity. Pts received Cami every 3 weeks (1 cycle) with dose escalation per a 3+3 design. Disease control rate (DCR) was assessed (complete and partial responses [CR, PR] and stable disease). Results: At data cut-off (Dec 17, 2020), 44 pts were enrolled, with primary tumor types (stage IVA/B: 27 pts; 61.4%) of colorectal (15 pts; 34.1%), pancreatic (14 pts; 31.8%), head and neck, ovarian/fallopian tube, and renal cell carcinoma (all 3 pts; 6.8%), non-small cell lung cancer (2 pts; 4.5%), gastric, esophageal/GEJ, melanoma, and triple-negative breast cancer (each 1 pt; 2.3%). Median (range) age was 60.5 (33–82) years; median (range) number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (1–9). Pts received a median (range) of 2 (1–6) Cami cycles at doses of 20–150 µg/kg. Median (range) treatment duration was 22 (1–178) days. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. All-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥20% pts were nausea (18 pts; 40.9%), decreased appetite and fatigue (each 16 pts; 36.4%), constipation (13 pts; 29.5%), abdominal pain (11 pts; 25%), and rash (10 pts; 22.7%). The only Grade ≥3 TEAE in ≥10% pts was anemia (5 pts; 11.4%). Grade 3 autoimmune AEs (colitis, immune-mediated AE, systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and neurologic AEs (dysphagia and asthenia, but not GBS) were reported in 3 (6.8%) and 2 (4.5%) pts, respectively. 1 (2.3%) Cami-related TEAE led to treatment withdrawal; no Cami-related TEAEs were fatal. DCR was 25% (95% CI: 11.1, 34.7); 11/44 pts attained stable disease. No pts had CR or PR. Conclusions: Dose escalation of Cami monotherapy is complete. The safety profile is encouraging and MTD was not reached. PK/PD data will be presented. 150 µg/kg is the highest dose investigated for single-agent Cami and the highest to be investigated combined with pembrolizumab in selected advanced solid tumors in the current protocol. Funding: ADC Therapeutics SA NCT03621982. Clinical trial information: NCT03621982.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document