265 Phase 1b study of avelumab + M9241 (NHS-IL12) in patients with advanced solid tumors: interim analysis results from a urothelial carcinoma (UC) dose-expansion cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A291-A291
Author(s):  
Jean-Laurent Deville ◽  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
Marco Maruzzo ◽  
Theodore Gourdin ◽  
Michele Maio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Expansion Cohort

BackgroundAvelumab is an anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of advanced UC after disease progression during or following platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance treatment in patients whose disease has not progressed with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.1–3 M9241 is an immunocytokine composed of 2 heterodimers of IL-12 fused to the heavy chains of a human antibody targeting DNA released from necrotic tumor cells.4 During dose-escalation, avelumab + M9241 was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, including 2 objective responses in patients with UC.5 We report on an interim analysis of efficacy and safety from the dose-expansion part of JAVELIN IL-12 (NCT02994953).MethodsEligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic UC that had progressed on first-line therapy, were aged =18 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and were immune checkpoint inhibitor naive. Patients received the recommended phase 2 dose5 of avelumab 800 mg intravenously once weekly (QW) in combination with M9241 16.8 µg/kg subcutaneously Q4W for the first 12 weeks, then continued the combination with avelumab Q2W. The primary endpoints were confirmed best overall response (BOR) per investigator assessment (RECIST 1.1) and safety. The expansion cohort followed a 2-stage design. During stage 1 (single-arm part of the study), 16 patients were enrolled and treated. A futility analysis based on BOR was planned to determine if stage 2 (randomized controlled part of the study) would be initiated.ResultsAt data cut-off (Jun 3, 2020), 16 patients had received avelumab + M9241 for a median duration of 8 weeks (range, 4.0–25.0 weeks). No complete or partial responses were observed; the study failed to meet the criterion (>2 responders) to initiate stage 2. Two patients (12.5%) had stable disease, 13 (81.3%) had progressive disease, and 1 (6.3%) was not evaluable. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 15 patients (93.8%); the most common (in =4 patients) were pyrexia (50.0%), nausea (37.5%), asthenia (31.3%), anemia (25.0%), and hyperthermia (25.0%); grade 4 gamma-glutamyltransferase increased occurred in 1 patient (6.3%). No TRAEs led to death. Pharmacodynamic effects on the peripheral immune system and results of pharmacokinetic and biomarker analyses will also be reported.ConclusionsThe predefined efficacy criterion to proceed to stage 2 was not met. The combination was well tolerated; no new safety signals emerged and the profile was consistent with the dose-escalation part of the study.5Trial RegistrationNCT02994953Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by each site’s independent ethics committee.ConsentN/AReferencesBavencio(avelumab) injection [package insert]. Rockland, MA: EMD Serono, Inc; New York, NY: Pfizer Inc; 2020.Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada.html. Accessed July 31, 2020.US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves avelumab for urothelial carcinoma maintenance treatment. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/fda-approves-avelumab-urothelial-carcinoma-maintenance-treatment. Accessed July 31, 2020.Fallon J, Tighe R, Kradjian G, et al. The immunocytokine NHS-IL12 as a potential cancer therapeutic. Oncotarget. 2014;5:1869–1884.Strauss J, Vugmeyster Y, Sznol M, et al. Phase 1b, open-label, dose escalation study of M9241 (NHS-IL12) plus avelumab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(5 Suppl):Abstract 4062.

First-in-human phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) SAR408701 in advanced solid tumors: Dose-expansion cohort of patients (pts) with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ NSCLC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9072-9072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas Gazzah ◽  
Sophie Cousin ◽  
Valentina Boni ◽  
Charles Ricordel ◽  
Tae Min Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Cell Surface Glycoprotein ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

9072 Background: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5) is a cell-surface glycoprotein highly expressed in several tumor types. This Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, dose-expansion study (NCT02187848) investigated SAR408701, a DM4 conjugated ADC targeting CEACAM5, in pts with advanced solid tumors. During dose escalation, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SAR408701 was 100 mg/m2 IV once every 2 weeks in 14-day cycles. Interim analysis of an ongoing expansion cohort in pts with NSQ NSCLC with CEACAM5 expression in ≥ 50% of the tumor cell population is reported. Methods: SAR408701 was administered at MTD. Primary endpoint: overall response rate (ORR; expansion phase). Secondary endpoints include safety and pharmacokinetics (PK). Tumor assessments were performed every 4 cycles (8 weeks). Results: As of Aug 2, 2018, 22 pts with NSQ NSCLC (21 adenocarcinoma; 1 not yet reported) received SAR408701 at MTD. Median age: 60 years; male: 72.7%; ECOG PS (n = 21): 0 = 38.1%, 1 = 61.9%. Median number of prior anticancer therapies for advanced disease was 3; 66.7% (14/21) received ≥ 3 lines; 59.1% had prior anti-tubulin-based treatments. Pts received a median of 6.5 cycles. 15 pts discontinued due to progressive disease and 1 due to an adverse event (AE; peripheral neuropathy); 6 pts remain on study. ORR was estimated at 22.7% (5/22 pts; 90% CI 11.5–39.9); 40.9% had stable disease. Most frequently occurring all-grade treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were corneal events (40.9%; including keratitis 22.7% [1 Grade 3] and keratopathy 18.2%), dyspnea (31.8%; 5 Grade ≥ 3), asthenic conditions (31.8%) and diarrhea (27.3%). 6 pts had ≥ 1 dose modification due to a TEAE. PK analysis was performed in 14 pts at Cycle 1; mean Cmax, AUC, clearance and t1/2z were 53.1 µg/mL, 297 µg.day/mL, 0.685 L/day and 6.19 days, respectively. Conclusions: In pts with advanced NSQ NSCLC and CEACAM5 expression in ≥ 50% of tumor cells, SAR408701 had a favorable safety profile. Interim analysis of 22 pts achieved the predefined boundary for efficacy (≥ 4 of 30 pts). These data support further development in NSQ NSCLC. Funding: Sanofi Clinical trial information: NCT02187848.

A phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study to evaluate camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) as monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556
Author(s):  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Patricia LoRusso ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
Christopher T. Chen ◽  
Yvan LeBruchec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

2556 Background: Depletion of tumor-infiltrating CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), which inhibit tumor-specific immune responses, could contribute to tumor eradication. Cami (ADCT-301), an anti-CD25, pyrrolobenzodiazepine-based antibody-drug conjugate, targets CD25+ Tregs. A mouse surrogate has shown potent antitumor activity in solid tumor models. Here we report preliminary data from the monotherapy arm of a phase 1b trial of Cami in pts with selected advanced solid tumors. Methods: The monotherapy dose-escalation part of this open-label study enrolled pts (aged ≥18 years) with selected advanced solid tumors and no suitable existing therapy. The primary objective was to characterize safety and tolerability, and to identify the recommended phase 2 dose of Cami monotherapy. Secondary and exploratory objectives included evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity. Pts received Cami every 3 weeks (1 cycle) with dose escalation per a 3+3 design. Disease control rate (DCR) was assessed (complete and partial responses [CR, PR] and stable disease). Results: At data cut-off (Dec 17, 2020), 44 pts were enrolled, with primary tumor types (stage IVA/B: 27 pts; 61.4%) of colorectal (15 pts; 34.1%), pancreatic (14 pts; 31.8%), head and neck, ovarian/fallopian tube, and renal cell carcinoma (all 3 pts; 6.8%), non-small cell lung cancer (2 pts; 4.5%), gastric, esophageal/GEJ, melanoma, and triple-negative breast cancer (each 1 pt; 2.3%). Median (range) age was 60.5 (33–82) years; median (range) number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (1–9). Pts received a median (range) of 2 (1–6) Cami cycles at doses of 20–150 µg/kg. Median (range) treatment duration was 22 (1–178) days. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. All-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥20% pts were nausea (18 pts; 40.9%), decreased appetite and fatigue (each 16 pts; 36.4%), constipation (13 pts; 29.5%), abdominal pain (11 pts; 25%), and rash (10 pts; 22.7%). The only Grade ≥3 TEAE in ≥10% pts was anemia (5 pts; 11.4%). Grade 3 autoimmune AEs (colitis, immune-mediated AE, systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and neurologic AEs (dysphagia and asthenia, but not GBS) were reported in 3 (6.8%) and 2 (4.5%) pts, respectively. 1 (2.3%) Cami-related TEAE led to treatment withdrawal; no Cami-related TEAEs were fatal. DCR was 25% (95% CI: 11.1, 34.7); 11/44 pts attained stable disease. No pts had CR or PR. Conclusions: Dose escalation of Cami monotherapy is complete. The safety profile is encouraging and MTD was not reached. PK/PD data will be presented. 150 µg/kg is the highest dose investigated for single-agent Cami and the highest to be investigated combined with pembrolizumab in selected advanced solid tumors in the current protocol. Funding: ADC Therapeutics SA NCT03621982. Clinical trial information: NCT03621982.

Abstract PR06: Phase 1b dose-escalation study of trametinib (MEKi) plus palbociclib (CDK4/6i) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Sullivan ◽  
Rodabe N. Amaria ◽  
Donald P. Lawrence ◽  
John Brennan ◽  
Cathie Leister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Phase 1B

A phase I dose-escalation study of TKM-080301, a RNAi therapeutic directed against polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), in patients with advanced solid tumors: Expansion cohort evaluation of biopsy samples for evidence of pharmacodynamic effects of PLK1 inhibition.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2621-TPS2621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Northfelt ◽  
Solomon I. Hamburg ◽  
Mitesh J. Borad ◽  
Mahesh Seetharam ◽  
Kelly Kevelin Curtis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Data ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Pharmacodynamic Effects ◽  
Expansion Cohort ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

TPS2621 Background: TKM-080301 is a lipid nanoparticle formulation of a small interfering RNA (siRNA) directed against PLK1, a serine/threonine kinase that regulates multiple critical aspects of cell cycle progression and mitosis. Anti-tumor activity, RNA interference and pharmacodynamic effects of PLK1 inhibition have been conclusively demonstrated in preclinical models. Demonstration of pharmacodynamic effects of PLK1 inhibition in patient biopsy samples is an exploratory objective of this first-in-human study. Methods: TKME080301 is being evaluated in an open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 patients receive TKME080301 as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment can continue until disease progression, based on overall clinical benefit. Tumor response is determined according to RECIST criteria. Primary study objectives include determination of safety, maximum tolerated dose and dose limiting toxicities. Secondary objectives include characterization of pharmacokinetics and the preliminary assessment of anti-tumor activity. Five cohorts have been enrolled and a tentative Phase 2 dose has been identified. An expansion cohort of 10 patients began enrolling in February, 2013. The focus of the expansion cohort will be to collect additional safety and pharmacokinetic data at the tentative Phase 2 dose, as well as pharmacodynamic data from mandatory biopsy samples. Pre- and post-dose biopsy samples will be evaluated for potential evidence of PLK1 inhibition using 5’ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) polymerase chain reaction (to identify the predicted PLK1 mRNA cleavage product), histology (to assess for the presence of aberrant mitotic figures) and immunohistochemistry. An update on enrollment and pharmacodynamic evaluations will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01262235.

Interim analysis of ibrutinib plus paclitaxel for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4522-4522
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Castellano ◽  
Rafael Morales-Barrera ◽  
Ignacio Duran ◽  
Bhumsuk Keam ◽  
Ik Joo Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Major Hemorrhage ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

4522 Background: Patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy (PBCT) have a median overall survival (OS) of ~6 mo on CT and 8-10 mo on novel immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Treatment (tx) with ibrutinib (ibr), a first-in-class, once-daily inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) with immunomodulatory properties, plus paclitaxel (pac) may improve outcomes for pts with aUC. Methods: Pts with aUC who had 1-2 prior tx (≥1 PBCT and/or ICIs) formed one cohort of this phase 1b/2 study. Recommended phase 2 dose per phase 1b was ibr 840 mg/d + weekly pac 80 mg/m2 in 21-d cycles; starting ibr dose of 560 mg/d. nanoString gene expression assay (NanoString Technologies) was used for preliminary assessment of ibr-targeted kinases in baseline tumor biopsies. Results: This interim analysis included the first 29 pts treated (ibr 840/560 mg/d, n = 25/4; median age 67 y). 52% had 2 prior regimens (prior PD-L1 inhibitors, 100%). Median time on study/tx was 7.2/2.3 mo (max tx: 11.5 mo). Unconfirmed overall response rate (ORR) was 41% (complete/partial response: 10%/31%). Disease control rate was 62%. ORR was 71% for 7 pts with only lymph node metastases; ORR was 36% for 14 pts with 1 prior tx and 47% for 15 pts with 2 prior tx. Median duration of response was 4.2 mo (90% CI: 1.9-7.1). Median progression-free survival was 3.6 mo (90% CI: 1.6-5.4). Median OS was 14.7 mo (90% CI: 7.7-15.9). Follow-up is ongoing for durability/survival with 6 pts alive without progression, including 4 still on ibr. 76% of pts had grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs); 4 discontinued ibr + pac due to AEs and 1 had major hemorrhage. Pac exposure was not impacted by ibr; pac geometric mean Cmax (2066 ng/mL) and AUC0-∞ (3813 ng·h/mL) were consistent with historical data. Preliminary tumor biopsy data showed a nonsignificant trend of higher BTK/ITK/BMX expression in tx responders; analyses are ongoing. Conclusions: Ibr + pac shows promising results for ORR/OS in pts with aUC previously treated with PBCT and ICIs. No unexpected safety signals were seen; ibr + pac seemed tolerable. Follow-up of these and additional pts will support the activity and safety of ibr + pac in this study. Clinical trial information: NCT02599324.

Dose escalation and expansion cohort study for DS-8895a in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taroh Satoh ◽  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Kensei Yamaguchi ◽  
Kei Muro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Igg1 Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

99 Background: Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular receptor A2 (EPHA2) is overexpressed on the cell surface of many tumors and is associated with poor prognosis, suggesting EPHA2 as a target for cancer therapy. DS-8895a is an afucosylated, humanized anti-EPHA2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody with potent cytotoxicity. We report results from a phase I clinical trial to determine safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of DS-8895a in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT02004717). Methods: Step 1 (dose escalation cohort) had patients with advanced solid tumors and comprised of six dose levels (0.1–20 mg/mL, intravenous infusion, every 2 weeks [Q2W]) with a 28-day dose limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period. Step 2 (expansion cohort) patients had gastric or esophageal cancer confirmed to be EPHA2 positive by immunohistochemistry. Dose level in Step 2 was determined based on results obtained in Step 1. We evaluated safety, PK, potential biomarkers including circulating NK cells and cytokines, and tumor response. Results: Maximum tolerated dose was not reached in Step 1 (n = 22). DS-8895a was administered at 20 mg/kg Q2W in Step 2 (n = 15). Among 37 patients in the safety analysis set, adverse events (AEs) were reported in 97.3% (64.9% drug-related); 35.1% presented grade ≥ 3 AEs (8.1% drug-related). Dose delay and study discontinuation due to AEs (treatment related: grade 4 platelet decrease, hypoesthesia, hypotension, peripheral coldness, nausea, and vomiting) were observed in one and four patients (20 mg/kg), respectively. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 51.4% of patients resulting in 10 dose interruptions with one discontinuation. Serum inflammatory cytokines were transiently increased 4 h from the end of infusion drug administration. Serum DS-8895a maximum and trough concentrations increased dose-dependently. Biomarkers had no apparent relationship to best overall response. Seven patients in Step 1 achieved stable disease; in Step 2, six patients achieved stable disease and one patient achieved partial response. Conclusions: DS-8895a was safe and well tolerated up to 20 mg/kg. The PK of DS-8895a was dose-dependent as expected. Clinical trial information: NCT02004717.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document