THE ROLE OF BIG DATA AND REAL WORLD DATA

The Breast ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S22
Author(s):  
George W. Sledge
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 100043
Author(s):  
Eleni Gavriilaki ◽  
Eudoxia-Evaggelia Koravou ◽  
Thomas Chatziconstantinou ◽  
Christina Kalpadaki ◽  
Nikoleta Printza ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 378 (23) ◽  
pp. 2155-2157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann W. McMahon ◽  
Gerald Dal Pan

Oral Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 105454
Author(s):  
Irene H. Nauta ◽  
Thomas Klausch ◽  
Peter M. van de Ven ◽  
Frank J.P. Hoebers ◽  
Lisa Licitra ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  

Introducción: El abandono del tratamiento del trastorno por uso de sustancias (TUS) es un resultado persistente y con alta prevalencia (>50%) tanto en pacientes residenciales como ambulatorios. No obstante, los pacientes residenciales suelen presentar mayores problemas al inicio del tratamiento. El abandono del tratamiento ha sido señalado como predictor de la recaída y ha sido predicho por variables clínicas tales como la presencia de la patología dual. Sin embargo, aún son escasos los estudios que realizan un seguimiento del abandono durante el tratamiento de estos pacientes. Objetivo: Conocer la capacidad predictiva del diagnóstico dual frente al trastorno por uso de sustancias solo, respecto al abandono del tratamiento. Método: Muestra formada por 1825 pacientes con TUS y 584 pacientes con patología dual, pertenecientes a 23 comunidades terapéuticas integradas en la Red Pública de Atención a las Adicciones de España, en la región de Andalucía. Este estudio usa variables estandarizadas del Sistema de Información del Plan Andaluz Sobre Drogas y Adicciones (SiPASDA), y los diagnósticos presentes en este sistema fueron realizados mediante la versión española de la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades (CIE-10). Resultados: Aunque ambos grupos presentaron altas tasas de abandono, en el análisis de supervivencia, los pacientes con patología dual presentaron un incremento mensual del riesgo de abandono del 14% frente a aquellos pacientes que solo presentaban diagnostico de TUS. Conclusiones: Este estudio presenta una alta validez ecológica por el hecho de usar Real-World Data y proporciona evidencias acerca de la dificultad que pueden encontrar los pacientes con patología dual para retenerse en tratamiento frente a quienes solo tienen diagnóstico de TUS, a pesar de seguir ambos grupos los mismos tipos de tratamiento en términos generales. Este trabajo se acoge al proyecto “COMPARA: Comorbilidad Psiquiátrica en Adicciones y Resultados en Andalucía. Modelización a través de Big Data” con referencia P20_00735


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Kevin Lu ◽  
Xiaomo Xiong ◽  
Taiying Lee ◽  
Jun Wu ◽  
Jing Yuan ◽  
...  

Background: Big data and real-world data (RWD) have been increasingly used to measure the effectiveness and costs in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). However, the characteristics and methodologies of CEA based on big data and RWD remain unknown. The objectives of this study were to review the characteristics and methodologies of the CEA studies based on big data and RWD and to compare the characteristics and methodologies between the CEA studies with or without decision-analytic models. Methods: The literature search was conducted in Medline (Pubmed), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (as of June 2020). Full CEA studies with an incremental analysis that used big data and RWD for both effectiveness and costs written in English were included. There were no restrictions regarding publication date. Results: 70 studies on CEA using RWD (37 with decision-analytic models and 33 without) were included. The majority of the studies were published between 2011 and 2020, and the number of CEA based on RWD has been increasing over the years. Few CEA studies used big data. Pharmacological interventions were the most frequently studied intervention, and they were more frequently evaluated by the studies without decision-analytic models, while those with the model focused on treatment regimen. Compared to CEA studies using decision-analytic models, both effectiveness and costs of those using the model were more likely to be obtained from literature review. All the studies using decision-analytic models included sensitivity analyses, while four studies no using the model neither used sensitivity analysis nor controlled for confounders. Conclusion: The review shows that RWD has been increasingly applied in conducting the cost-effectiveness analysis. However, few CEA studies are based on big data. In future CEA studies using big data and RWD, it is encouraged to control confounders and to discount in long-term research when decision-analytic models are not used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document