A cone beam computed tomography system for true 3D imaging of specimens

1997 ◽  
Vol 48 (10-12) ◽  
pp. 1433-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Reimann ◽  
Sean M. Hames ◽  
Michael J. Flynn ◽  
David P. Fyhrie
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy Makdissi

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a relatively new modality providing 3D imaging that has become more accessible than ever to dental practice. This brings in new challenges that need to be addressed. This article discusses the role of CBCT in dentistry and highlights the availability of current guidelines.


2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdis Mohammadpour ◽  
Neema Bakhshalian ◽  
Shahriar Shahab ◽  
Shaya Sadeghi ◽  
Mona Ataee ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Minu Raju ◽  
Shobha J Rodrigues ◽  
Mahesh Mundathaje ◽  
Sabaa Qureshi

ABSTRACT Background The evolution of cone beam computed tomo- graphy three-dimensional (CBCT 3D) imaging has dramatically changed the potential for presurgical and pretreatment planning, such that outcomes are more predictable and complications more avoidable. Purpose The purpose of this article was to systematically review scientific and clinical literature pertaining to the uses and benefits of 3D imaging CBCT for diagnosis and treatment planning in Implantology including prosthodontics. Materials and methods Various databases, like PubMed, EBSCOhost and ScienceDirect, were searched from 1998 to 2010 to retrieve articles regarding the clinical applications of CBCT in dentistry. Cone beam computed tomography in dentistry was used as a key phrase to extract relevant articles in dentistry. A manual search for the references from the retrieved articles was also completed. The articles published only in English, randomized clinical trials, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, laboratory and computer-generated research were included.   The search revealed 540 articles of which 447 were irrele- vant to the study and therefore excluded. Results Cone beam computed tomography has created an opportunity for clinicians to acquire the highest quality diagno- stic images with an absorbed dose that is comparable to other dental radiological examinations and less than a conventional CT. Therefore, if placement of an implant might approach a nerve, invade the sinus, or penetrate out of the confines of the jawbone, the patient should be offered a discussion of CBCT 3D imaging. In addition, CBCT 3D patients should be advised of the risks, benefits and alternatives to such treatment, based upon any additional data provided by the imaging. How to cite this article Rodrigues SJ, Mundathaje M, Raju M, Qureshi S. Three-dimensional Imaging in Implant Assessment for the Prosthodontist: Utilization of the Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2014;4(1):23-33.


2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Woo Seo ◽  
Bo Kyung Cha ◽  
Ryun Kyung Kim ◽  
Cho-Rong Kim ◽  
Keedong Yang ◽  
...  

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 8484
Author(s):  
Leah Yi ◽  
Hyeran Helen Jeon ◽  
Chenshuang Li ◽  
Normand Boucher ◽  
Chun-Hsi Chung

The aim of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the sagittal and vertical growth of the maxillo–mandibular complex in untreated children using orthogonal lateral cephalograms compressed from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Two sets of scans, on 12 males (mean 8.75 years at T1, and 11.52 years at T2) and 18 females (mean 9.09 years at T1, and 10.80 years at T2), were analyzed using Dolphin 3D imaging. The displacements of the landmarks and rotations of both jaws relative to the cranial base were measured using the cranial base, and the maxillary and mandibular core lines. From T1 to T2, relative to the cranial base, the nasion, orbitale, A-point, and B-point moved anteriorly and inferiorly. The porion moved posteriorly and inferiorly. The ANB and mandibular plane angle decreased. All but one subject had forward rotation in reference to the cranial base. The maxillary and mandibular superimpositions showed no sagittal change on the A-point and B-point. The U6 and U1 erupted at 0.94 and 1.01 mm/year (males) and 0.82 and 0.95 mm/year (females), respectively. The L6 and L1 erupted at 0.66 and 0.88 mm/year (males), and at 0.41 mm/year for both the L6 and the L1 (females), respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document