In celebration of science in the study of reading development, reading difficulties, and reading instruction: The NICHD perspective

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
G REIDLYON
Author(s):  
Amber E. Benedict ◽  
Mary Brownell ◽  
Elizabeth Bettini ◽  
Hyojong Sohn

Despite evidence that tiered instruction within response to intervention (RTI) frameworks is important for students with reading difficulties, no complementary professional development (PD) research demonstrates how teachers can develop knowledge necessary to implement coordinated evidence-based instruction across instructional tiers. One promising PD approach combines lesson study (LS) with content-focused PD sessions; PD sessions introduce teachers to new knowledge, while LS supports teachers in integrating knowledge into their instructional repertoires. We used grounded theory methods to investigate how teams of upper elementary teachers’ ( n = 7) understandings of coordinated, tiered reading instruction changed through participation in Project InSync, a year-long PD consisting of content-focused PD workshops and LS cycles. Results indicate that, through interactions during LS sessions, teachers developed more sophisticated and integrated understandings of word study content, pedagogical practices, students’ struggles with literacy, and coordinating instruction across instructional tiers. Results have implications for teacher PD within RTI frameworks.


2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn A. Denton ◽  
Kim Nimon ◽  
Patricia G. Mathes ◽  
Elizabeth A. Swanson ◽  
Caroline Kethley ◽  
...  

This effectiveness study examined a supplemental reading intervention that may be appropriate as one component of a response-to-intervention (RTI) system. First-grade students in 31 schools who were at risk for reading difficulties were randomly assigned to receive Responsive Reading Instruction (RRI; Denton, 2001; Denton & Hocker, 2006; n = 182) or typical school practice (TSP; n = 40). About 43% of the TSP students received an alternate school-provided supplemental reading intervention. Results indicated that the RRI group had significantly higher outcomes than the TSP group on multiple measures of reading. About 91% of RRI students and 79% of TSP students met word reading criteria for adequate intervention response, but considerably fewer met a fluency benchmark.


1996 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riitta-Liisa Korkeamäki ◽  
Mariam Jean Dreher

This study investigated children's reading strategies and progress when a meaning-based approach to reading instruction was implemented in a Finnish 1st-grade classroom. A reading program was designed in which the teacher introduced predictable books, literacy-related centers, and minilessons in context on selected letter-sound correspondences. Field notes and videotapes of individual reading sessions were analyzed to describe the strategies the students used while reading both familiar and unfamiliar books. In the fall, in a familiar context, the students read mostly based on their memory. In an unfamiliar context, the students used graphemic information and sounded out and elongated the words and named some letters. Later, they used their phonological recoding skills in both familiar and unfamiliar contexts. All the students progressed toward conventional reading, demonstrating that they had reached at least the alphabetic phase of reading development.


2004 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 421-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asha K. Jitendra ◽  
Lana L. Edwards ◽  
Kristin Starosta ◽  
Gabriell Sacks ◽  
Lisa A. Jacobson ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 301-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Vaughn ◽  
Sylvia Linan-Thompson ◽  
Kamiar Kouzekanani ◽  
Diane Pedrotty Bryant ◽  
Shirley Dickson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document