scholarly journals PCN74 PSYCHOSOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF ABNORMAL AND FALSE-POSITIVE RESULTS IN LUNG CANCER SCREENING: ADAPTATION OF A QUESTIONNAIRE

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. A345-A346
Author(s):  
H Thorsen ◽  
J Brodersen
BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e034682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Fraes Rasmussen ◽  
Volkert Siersma ◽  
Jessica Malmqvist ◽  
John Brodersen

ObjectivesLung cancer CT screening can reduce lung cancer mortality, but high false-positive rates may cause adverse psychosocial consequences. The aim was to analyse the psychosocial consequences of false-positive lung cancer CT screening using the lung cancer screening-specific questionnaire, Consequences of Screening in Lung Cancer (COS-LC).Design and settingThis study was a matched cohort study, nested in the randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST).ParticipantsOur study included all 130 participants in the DLCST with positive CT results in screening rounds 2–5, who had completed the COS-LC questionnaire. Participants were split into a true-positive and a false-positive group and were then matched 1:2 with a control group (n=248) on sex, age (±3 years) and the time of screening for the positive CT groups or clinic visit for the control group. The true positives and false positives were also matched 1:2 with participants with negative CT screening results (n=252).Primary outcomesPrimary outcomes were psychosocial consequences measured at five time points.ResultsFalse positives experienced significantly more negative psychosocial consequences in seven outcomes at 1 week and in three outcomes at 1 month compared with the control group and the true-negative group (mean ∆ score >0 and p<0.001). True positives experienced significantly more negative psychosocial consequences in one outcome at 1 week (mean ∆ score 2.86 (95% CI 1.01 to 4.70), p=0.0024) and in five outcomes at 1 month (mean ∆ score >0 and p<0.004) compared with the true-negative group and the control group. No long-term psychosocial consequences were identified either in false positives or true positives.ConclusionsReceiving a false-positive result in lung cancer screening was associated with negative short-term psychosocial consequences. These findings contribute to the evidence on harms of screening and should be taken into account when considering implementation of lung cancer screening programmes.Trial registration numberNCT00496977.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Kaminetzky ◽  
Hannah S. Milch ◽  
Anna Shmukler ◽  
Abraham Kessler ◽  
Robert Peng ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1836-1845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolein A. Heuvelmans ◽  
Matthijs Oudkerk ◽  
Geertruida H. de Bock ◽  
Harry J. de Koning ◽  
Xueqian Xie ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3860
Author(s):  
J. Luis Espinoza ◽  
Le Thanh Dong

Nearly one-quarter of all cancer deaths worldwide are due to lung cancer, making this disease the leading cause of cancer death among both men and women. The most important determinant of survival in lung cancer is the disease stage at diagnosis, thus developing an effective screening method for early diagnosis has been a long-term goal in lung cancer care. In the last decade, and based on the results of large clinical trials, lung cancer screening programs using low-dose computer tomography (LDCT) in high-risk individuals have been implemented in some clinical settings, however, this method has various limitations, especially a high false-positive rate which eventually results in a number of unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions among the screened subjects. By using complex algorithms and software, artificial intelligence (AI) is capable to emulate human cognition in the analysis, interpretation, and comprehension of complicated data and currently, it is being successfully applied in various healthcare settings. Taking advantage of the ability of AI to quantify information from images, and its superior capability in recognizing complex patterns in images compared to humans, AI has the potential to aid clinicians in the interpretation of LDCT images obtained in the setting of lung cancer screening. In the last decade, several AI models aimed to improve lung cancer detection have been reported. Some algorithms performed equal or even outperformed experienced radiologists in distinguishing benign from malign lung nodules and some of those models improved diagnostic accuracy and decreased the false-positive rate. Here, we discuss recent publications in which AI algorithms are utilized to assess chest computer tomography (CT) scans imaging obtaining in the setting of lung cancer screening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document