scholarly journals Effect of water contamination on the shear bond strength of self-ligating brackets

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Francesca Sfondrini ◽  
Danilo Fraticelli ◽  
Serena Di Corato ◽  
Andrea Scribante ◽  
Paola Gandini
Author(s):  
A. Vicente ◽  
M. Toledano ◽  
LA. Bravo ◽  
A. Romeo ◽  
B. De la Higuera ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Azevedo ◽  
Ana Lucia Machado ◽  
Eunice Teresinha Giampaolo ◽  
Ana Claudia Pavarina ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Vergani

2003 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 633-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittorio Cacciafesta ◽  
Maria Francesca Sfondrini ◽  
Marco De Angelis ◽  
Andrea Scribante ◽  
Catherine Klersy

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Francesca Sfondrini ◽  
Danilo Fraticelli ◽  
Paola Gandini ◽  
Andrea Scribante

Purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of water and saliva contamination on the shear bond strength and failure site of orthodontic brackets and lingual buttons.Materials and Methods. 120 bovine permanent mandibular incisors were randomly divided into 6 groups of 20 specimens each. Both orthodontic brackets and disinclusion buttons were tested under three different enamel surface conditions: (a) dry, (b) water contamination, and (c) saliva contamination. Brackets and buttons were bonded to the teeth and subsequently tested using a Instron universal testing machine. Shear bond strength values and adhesive failure rate were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (strength values) and Chi squared test (ARI Scores).Results. Noncontaminated enamel surfaces showed the highest bond strengths for both brackets and buttons. Under water and saliva contamination orthodontic brackets groups showed significantly lower shear strengths than disinclusion buttons groups. Significant differences in debond locations were found among the groups under the various enamel surface conditions.Conclusions. Water and saliva contamination of enamel during the bonding procedure lowers bond strength values, more with orthodontic brackets than with disinclusion buttons.


2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. E171-E177 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Schittly ◽  
S Le Goff ◽  
C Besnault ◽  
M Sadoun ◽  
ND Ruse

SUMMARY Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of water storage on the flexural strength (σf) of four self-etching adhesive resin cements (SEARC) and on the dentin-titanium shear bond strength (SBS) mediated by them. Materials and Methods The selected SEARC were Rely X Unicem, G-Cem, Maxcem, and SmartCem2. For each material, 50 bars (2×2×25 mm) were made and stored in water at 37°C for 1 hour, 1 day, 7 days, 30 days, and 60 days before σf was determined via a three-point bend test. Titanium cylinders were bonded to freshly exposed human dentin surfaces using the selected cements. Fifty samples were obtained for each SEARC and were stored in water at 37°C for 1 hour, 1 day, 7 days, 30 days, and 60 days before SBS was determined. The results were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance followed by Scheffé multiple means comparisons (α=0.05). Pearson's correlation coefficient between σf and SBS was determined. Results Significantly different σf and SBS values were obtained for the four cements. With regards to the effect of water storage, the σf of all materials increased during the first 7 days, was not significantly different between materials by 30 days, and then remained relatively constant or decreased for SmartCem2; SBS was not affected by water storage, with the exception of Maxcem, where a significant drop in SBS was detected after 1 day and no deterioration thereafter. No correlation was found between σf and SBS. Conclusions Under the experimental conditions of this study, 60 days of water storage negatively affected the σf of SmartCem2 but did not negatively affect the SEARC-mediated dentin-titanium SBS (Maxcem showed a significant drop in SBS after 1 day but no deterioration thereafter). The dentin-titanium adherence afforded by Rely X and G-Cem was significantly higher than that of Maxcem and SmartCem2.


1998 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 402-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittorio Cacciafesta ◽  
Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann ◽  
Uwe Süßenberger ◽  
Rainer-Reginald Miethke

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ascensión Vicente ◽  
Ana Mena ◽  
Antonio José Ortiz ◽  
Luis Alberto Bravo

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effects of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a moisture-tolerant light cure system. Materials and Methods: Brackets were bonded to 240 bovine lower incisors divided into 12 groups. Four bonding procedures were evaluated, including (1) TSEP/Transbond XT, (2) TMIP/ Transbond XT, (3) TSEP/Transbond PLUS, and (4) TMIP/Transbond PLUS, each under three different bonding conditions: without contamination, with water contamination, and with saliva contamination. Shear bond strength was measured with a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant on the teeth was quantified with the use of image analyzing equipment. Results: Without contamination, bond strengths for the four procedures were similar (P > .05). TSEP/Tranbond PLUS and TMIP/Transbond PLUS left significantly less adhesive on the teeth after debonding than TSEP/Transbond XT and TMIP/Transbond XT (P < .008). Bond strength and adhesive remaining for TMIP/Transbond XT contaminated with water or saliva showed significantly worse performance than the other procedures evaluated (P < .008). Contamination (with water or saliva) did not affect either bond strength or adhesive remaining on the teeth for TSEP/ Transbond XT, TSEP/Transbond PLUS, or TMIP/Transbond PLUS (P > .017), although for TMIP/ Transbond XT, both variables showed significant reductions after contamination (P < .017). Conclusion: TSEP/Transbond PLUS, TMIP/Transbond PLUS, and TSEP/Transbond XT showed greater tolerance to wet conditions than was shown by TMIP/Transbond XT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document