scholarly journals The effect of water storage on micro-shear bond strength of contemporary composite resins using different dentin adhesive systems

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.M. Kamel ◽  
H.Y. Elsayed ◽  
A.I. Abdalla ◽  
A.M. Darrag
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Effect Of Water ◽  
Dentin Adhesive

Effect of Water Storage on Bond Strength of Self-etching Adhesives to Dentin

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 46-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubens Nazareno Garcia ◽  
Mario Fernando de Goes ◽  
Marcelo Giannini
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Internal Diameter ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Effect Of Water ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
One Year

Abstract Aim The objective of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems one week and one year after storage in water. Methods and Materials Fragments from the buccal surfaces of 45 bovine teeth were prepared (12 mm in length X 5 mm in width X 1.0 mm in thickness). Dentin surfaces were wet-abraded with 600-grit SiC paper to create a standardized smear layer. Samples were randomly assigned to 18 experimental groups (n=5), according to nine adhesive systems tested (Single Bond; Adper Prompt L-Pop; iBond; One-Up Bond F; Xeno III; Clearfil SE Bond; Optibond Solo Plus SE; Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus; and UniFil Bond) and two waterstorage times (one week and one year). Adhesives were applied according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Z250 composite was applied into the molds to fill up the internal diameter volume of a Tygon tubing mold (1.0 mm high / 0.7 mm internal diameter). Micro-shear bond strengths were determined using an apparatus attached to an Instron Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed using a twoway analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's test (5%). Results One year after water storage the dentin bond strength of all adhesive systems reduced significantly, except for One-Up Bond F. Conclusion Water-storage time decreased the bond strength for most dentin bonding agents tested. Citation Garcia RN, de Goes MF, Giannini M. Effect of Water Storage on Bond Strength of Self-etching Adhesives to Dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 November; (8)7:046-053.

Effect of Water Storage on the Flexural Strength of Four Self-etching Adhesive Resin Cements and on the Dentin-titanium Shear Bond Strength Mediated by Them

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. E171-E177 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Schittly ◽  
S Le Goff ◽  
C Besnault ◽  
M Sadoun ◽  
ND Ruse
Keyword(s):  
Flexural Strength ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Significant Drop ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Effect Of Water ◽  
Three Point Bend Test

SUMMARY Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of water storage on the flexural strength (σf) of four self-etching adhesive resin cements (SEARC) and on the dentin-titanium shear bond strength (SBS) mediated by them. Materials and Methods The selected SEARC were Rely X Unicem, G-Cem, Maxcem, and SmartCem2. For each material, 50 bars (2×2×25 mm) were made and stored in water at 37°C for 1 hour, 1 day, 7 days, 30 days, and 60 days before σf was determined via a three-point bend test. Titanium cylinders were bonded to freshly exposed human dentin surfaces using the selected cements. Fifty samples were obtained for each SEARC and were stored in water at 37°C for 1 hour, 1 day, 7 days, 30 days, and 60 days before SBS was determined. The results were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance followed by Scheffé multiple means comparisons (α=0.05). Pearson's correlation coefficient between σf and SBS was determined. Results Significantly different σf and SBS values were obtained for the four cements. With regards to the effect of water storage, the σf of all materials increased during the first 7 days, was not significantly different between materials by 30 days, and then remained relatively constant or decreased for SmartCem2; SBS was not affected by water storage, with the exception of Maxcem, where a significant drop in SBS was detected after 1 day and no deterioration thereafter. No correlation was found between σf and SBS. Conclusions Under the experimental conditions of this study, 60 days of water storage negatively affected the σf of SmartCem2 but did not negatively affect the SEARC-mediated dentin-titanium SBS (Maxcem showed a significant drop in SBS after 1 day but no deterioration thereafter). The dentin-titanium adherence afforded by Rely X and G-Cem was significantly higher than that of Maxcem and SmartCem2.

scholarly journals Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Composite Restoration to Intact Enamel of Primary Incisors using Different Conditioners, and Adhesive Systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Ali Nozari ◽  
Ali Heidari ◽  
Ebrahim Azimi ◽  
Azade Rafiee
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Bond Force ◽  
Application Procedure ◽  
Acid Etch ◽  
Composite Restoration

Background: Esthetic demands among patients have led to the introduction of tooth-colored restorations. Composite resins bond to enamel applying acid etch technique. Total etch adhesion systems are still considered as golden standard among bonding systems. However, clinicians have tendency towards using adhesive systems with a simplified application procedure. The aim of the present study is to compare the shear-bond strength of composite restoration to intact enamel of primary incisors using different conditioners, and adhesive systems.Materials and Methods: This experimental study was conducted in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. 53 teeth were classified into 5 groups based on the bonding procedure. After composite build-up, specimens were placed in a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 1mm/min. Inter-group comparison of the shear-bond strength to enamel was analyzed employing One-way-ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS (Version 17, Chicago, IL, USA).Results: The highest shear-bond strength was related to the second (37% phosphoric acid etching + Margin Bond adhesive system), and the fifth group (37% phosphoric acid etch + Tokuyama Bond Force adhesive system), and the lowest bond strength was related to the third group (Tokuyama Bond Force adhesive system alone) (p value = 0.00).Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, surface pre-treatment with 37% PA accompanied with self-etching adhesive system, increased the shear-bond strength in vitro. This method can be further studied in clinical settings.

scholarly journals Effect of ageing media on shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems (A comparative in-vitro study)

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
Ahmed D Hatf ◽  
Mustafa M AL-Khatieeb
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Acid Challenge

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of different orthodontic adhesive systems after exposure to aging media (water storage and acid challenge). Materials and methods: Eighty human upper premolar teeth were extracted for orthodontic purposes and randomly divided into two groups (40 teeth each): the first group in which the bonded teeth were stored in distilled water for 30 days at 37°C, and the second group in which the bonded teeth were subjected to acid challenge. Each group was further subdivided into four subgroups (10 teeth each) according to the type of adhesive system that would be bonded to metal brackets: either non-fluoride releasing adhesive (NFRA), fluoride releasing adhesive (FRA), Fluoride releasing bond with self-etching primer (FRBSP), or powder and liquid orthodontic fluoride releasing adhesive (PLFRA). After 30 days of water storage and acid challenge ageing procedures, the SBS was determined using Instron testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The ARI was assessed using a stereomicroscope with 10 X magnification. Result: The SBS testing revealed significant differences (p< 0.05) among the four tested adhesive systems in water storage and acid challenge groups using ANOVA F-test. In both groups, the NFRA subgroup exhibited the highest mean SBS value, followed by FRASP, then FRA subgroups, while the PLFRA subgroup had the lowest value of mean SBS. The independent t-test showed non-significant differences in mean SBS values between water storage and acid challenge groups. In respect to the ARI analysis, the Chi-square test showed significant differences among the tested adhesive systems. Conclusion: The shear bond strength of the fluoride releasing adhesive system was less than that of the non-fluoride releasing adhesive system, but still above the clinically acceptable range.

The Effect of Dentin Desensitizer on Shear Bond Strength of Conventional and Self-adhesive Resin Luting Cements After Aging

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 492-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Stawarczyk ◽  
R Hartmann ◽  
L Hartmann ◽  
M Roos ◽  
M Özcan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
Aging Conditions ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Panavia 21

SUMMARY This study tested the impact of Gluma Desensitizer on the shear bond strength (SBS) of two conventional (RelyX ARC, Panavia 21) and two self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem, G-Cem) resin luting cements after water storage and thermocycling. Human third molars (N=880) were embedded in acrylic resin. The buccal dentin was exposed. Teeth were randomly divided into four main groups, and the following cements were adhered: 1) RelyX ARC, 2) Panavia 21, 3) RelyX Unicem, and 4) G-Cem. In half of the teeth in each group, dentin was treated with Gluma Desensitizer. In the conventional cement groups, the corresponding etchant and adhesive systems were applied. SBS of the cements was tested after 1 hour (initial); at 1, 4, 9, 16, and 25 days of water storage; and at 1, 4, 9, 16, and 25 days of thermocycling. SBS data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); this was followed by the post hoc Scheffé test and a t-test. Overall, the highest mean SBS (MPa) was obtained by RelyX ARC (ranging from 14.6 ± 3.9 to 17.6 ± 5.2) and the lowest by Panavia 21 in combination with Gluma Desensitizer (ranging from 0.0 to 2.9 ± 1.0). All tested groups with and without desensitizer showed no significant decrease after aging conditions compared with baseline values (p&gt;0.05). Only the Panavia 21/Gluma Desensitizer combination showed a significant decrease after 4 days of thermocyling compared with initial values and 1 day thermocycling. Self-adhesive cements with Gluma Desensitizer showed increased SBS after aging conditions (ranging from 7.4 ± 1.4 to 15.2 ± 3) compared with groups without desensitizer (ranging from 2.6 ± 1.2 to 8.8 ± 2.9). No cohesive failures in dentin were observed in any of the test groups. Although self-adhesive cements with and without desensitizer presented mainly adhesive failures after water storage (95.8%) and thermocyling (100%), conventional cement (RelyX ARC) showed mainly mixed failures (90.8% and 89.2%, after water storage and thermocyling, respectively). Application of the Gluma Desensitizer to dentin before cementation had a positive effect on the SBS of self-adhesive cements.

Shear Bond Strength of Different Adhesive Systems to Primary Dentin and Enamel

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Miranda ◽  
Luiz Henrique Maykot Prates ◽  
Ricardo de Souza Vieira ◽  
Maria Cristina Marino Calvo
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Mode Analysis ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Failure Mode Analysis ◽  
Distal Direction

The aims of this study were to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of four adhesive systems applied to primary dentin and enamel and verify, after SBS testing, the failure mode of the adhesive interface. Sixty extracted sound primary molars were selected and crowns were sectioned in a mesial-distal direction. Specimens were randomly assigned into two groups (adhesion to enamel and adhesion to dentin) and then subdivided into four subgroups according to the adhesive system (n=15): Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP) – Single Bond (SB) – Clearfil SE Bond (and Adper Prompt LPop (APL) – SBS tests were performed and the obtained values were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (p&lt;0.05). The failure mode analysis was performed with a Scanning Electron Microscope (XL-30, Philips). SBS mean values on enamel were [MPa (SD)]: SMP – 27.89 (7.49); SB – 23.92 (8.8); CSB – 24.36 (6.69); APL – 25.96 (4.08); and on dentin: SMP – 17.29 (4.25); SB – 18.2 (8.74); CSB – 16.13 (7.14); APL – 6.04 (3.35). The predominant failure mode was cohesive (primarily of the bonding agent). On enamel SBS was statistically similar for all four adhesives. On dentin SBS of APL was lower than the other tested adhesives.

scholarly journals Comparison of Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Various Bulk-fill Bioactive Dentin substitutes: An in vitro Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 997-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad I Alkhudhairy ◽  
Zeeshan H Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Physical And Mechanical Properties ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Intergroup Comparison ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tukey Honestly Significant Difference

ABSTRACT Introduction Various bulk-fill materials depending on their composition, viscosity, and flow ability have different physical and mechanical properties. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine and compare the shear bond strength and microleakage properties of activa restorative with other bulk-fill restorative materials surefil (SDR), Biodentine, ever X posterior. Materials and methods Forty permanent premolars were selected for shear bond strength, and 20 permanent premolars were selected with class II cavities on mesial and distal side for microleakage. Universal testing device was used to assess the shear bond strength. Microleakage was checked using dye penetration method under a stereomicroscope. Mean and standard deviation values were calculated from the recorded values. Intergroup comparison was done by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by pairwise comparison using Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test. Results The mean shear bond strength was highest for SDR surefil followed by Ever X posterior, Bioactive restorative, and Biodentine respectively. In this study, SDR (surefil) showed better shear bond strength and better microleakage properties compared with the other test materials (F = 186.7157, p < 0.05). Conclusion The result of this study showed that flowable and fiber-reinforced composites have better shear bond strength and microleakage properties. Clinical significance Flowable bulk-fill composite resins can be used as dentin substitutes because of its superior properties. How to cite this article Alkhudhairy FI, Ahmad ZH. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage of Various Bulk-fill Bioactive Dentin substitutes: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(12):997-1002.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document