1495 PUBLICATION Pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMG 706 on CYP3A activity using oral midazolam and the bioavailability of solid formulations in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: results of two phase 1 substudies

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 433
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Cyp3a Activity ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Oral Midazolam

Results of two phase I dose escalation studies of the oral heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor SNX-5422.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2617-2617
Author(s):  
Todd Michael Bauer ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Ramesh K. Ramanathan ◽  
Glen Weiss ◽  
Jasgit C. Sachdev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibitor ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Blurry Vision

2617 Background: SNX-5422 is a prodrug of SNX-2112, a highly potent, non-geldanamycin analog, HSP90 inhibitor with preclinical anti-tumor activity in multiple tumor models. These phase 1 studies were designed to evaluate safety and tolerability, determine dose limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), and describe pharmacokinetics of SNX-2112 and SNX-5422. Methods: Two phase 1, open-label, 3 + 3 dose-escalation studies evaluated SNX-5422 when given daily (QD) or every-other-day (QOD) during the first 30 days of treatment in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Plasma concentrations of SNX-2112 and SNX-5422 were measured after the first and 11th (steady state) doses. Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks. Results: In both studies, pts received SNX-5422 QOD, 3 wks on/1 wk off, with doses ranging from 4 to 133 mg/m2 QOD. In one study, pts also received QD doses from 50 to 89 mg/m2, 3 wks on/1 wk off, and 50 mg/m2 QD continuously. Fifty-six pts (34M/22F; mean age 62 years) were enrolled. Treatment-related adverse events were mainly low grade (G), including diarrhea (64%), nausea (39%), vomiting (29%), fatigue (27%), abdominal pain (14%), and anorexia (14%). Reversible G 1 blurry vision, and G 1-2 blurry vision/vision darkening were reported by 1 pt on 100 mg/m2 QOD, and 4 pts treated with 50 to 89 mg/m2 QD. G 3 diarrhea was dose limiting in 2 of 3 pts (89 mg/m2 QD; 133 mg/m2 QOD). MTDs for the QOD and QD schedules were declared at100 mg/m2 and 67 mg/m2, respectively. The QD schedule was associated with higher incidences of treatment related adverse events. 38 pts were evaluable for response including 1 confirmed durable complete response, 1 unconfirmed partial response, and 17 with stable disease. Activity was seen in adrenal, lung, liver, neuroendocrine, GIST, and prostate. All but 2 were seen with the QOD schedule. Conclusions: SNX-5422 mono-therapy was generally well tolerated and showed promising signs of efficacy in pts with advanced solid tumors. Given the superior benefit-risk profile of QOD dosing over QD dosing based on these preliminary clinical findings, 100 mg/m2 QOD has been selected for further clinical testing. Clinical trial information: NCT00506805 and NCT01611623.

scholarly journals 417 Design and rationale of a phase 1 study evaluating AMG 256, a novel, targeted, IL-21 receptor agonist and anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A443-A443
Author(s):  
Gregory Durm ◽  
Sophia Frentzas ◽  
Erik Rasmussen ◽  
Saltanat Najmi ◽  
Nooshin Sadraei
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Immunity ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
List Type ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Drug Study ◽  
Interleukin 21

BackgroundCheckpoint inhibitors are a promising therapy for patients with solid tumors; however, many patients require additional therapies to maximize clinical benefit or overcome resistance.1 The type-1 cytokine interleukin-21 (IL-21) is a promising candidate for combination and has shown clinical activity in melanoma and renal cell cancer.2 IL-21 has also shown improved efficacy when combined with anti-programmed death (PD)-1 antibodies in preclinical models.3 4 AMG 256 is a mutated IL-21 cytokine fused to an anti-PD-1 antibody to combine IL-21 pathway stimulation with checkpoint inhibition—a strategy that is designed to prime and extend the activity of cytotoxic and memory T cells and induce anti-tumor immunity. This first-in-human (FIH) study will assess safety, tolerability, and estimated dosing of AMG 256 monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsThis is a FIH, multicenter, non-randomized, open-label, phase 1 study (NCT04362748) of AMG 256 in patients with advanced solid tumors. The planned sample size is approximately 100 patients in two parts: part 1 will evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), part 2 will evaluate the MTD determined in part 1 to further characterize the safety profile and preliminary tumor response. AMG 256 will be delivered by intravenous (IV) infusion. Enrollment criteria include adults with life expectancy of > 3 months, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiation, and at least one measurable lesion ≥ 10 mm that has not undergone biopsy within 3 months of screening scan. Exclusion criteria include primary brain tumor, untreated or symptomatic brain metastases, currently receiving treatment in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 28 days since ending treatment on another investigational device or drug study, history of solid organ transplantation or major surgery within 28 days of study day 1, live vaccine therapy within 4 weeks prior to study day 1, and active infection requiring oral or IV therapy. The primary endpoints are incidence of dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events, MTD, and recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives will evaluate PK parameters, preliminary antitumor activity (objective response, duration of response, progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of stable disease, overall survival), and immunogenicity of AMG 256 via incidence of anti-AMG 256 antibodies.ResultsN/AConclusionsN/AAcknowledgements• The authors thank the investigators, patients, and study staff who are contributing to this study.• The study was sponsored and funded by Amgen Inc. • Medical writing support was provided by Christopher Nosala (Amgen Inc.).Trial RegistrationNCT04362748Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by all institutional ethics boards.ReferencesKluger HM, Tawbi HA, Ascierto ML, et al. Defining tumor resistance to PD-1 pathway blockade: recommendations from the first meeting of the SITC Immunotherapy Resistance Taskforce. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8:e000398.Thompson JA, Curti BD, Redman BG, et al. Phase I study of recombinant interleukin-21 in patients with metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2034–2039.Lewis KE, Selby MJ, Masters G, et al. Interleukin-21 combined with PD-1 or CTLA-4 blockade enhances antitumor immunity in mouse tumor models. Oncoimmunology. 2017;7:e1377873.Shen S, Sckisel G, Sahoo A, et al. Engineered IL-21 cytokine muteins fused to anti-PD-1 antibodies can improve CD8+ T cell function and anti-tumor immunity. Front Immunol 2020;11:832.

403 Early results from a phase 1 study to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of AMG 404, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A428-A428
Author(s):  
Timothy Price ◽  
Sant Chawla ◽  
Gerald Falchook ◽  
Hans Prenen ◽  
Iwona Lugowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

BackgroundEnhancement of antitumor immunity through inhibition of the checkpoint PD-1 receptor has been effective in the treatment of many malignancies. AMG 404 is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting PD-1. This phase 1, open-label, multicenter first-in-human study (NCT03853109) will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of AMG 404 monotherapy in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsThe primary study endpoint is dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and safety; key secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetic parameters, objective response rate (assessed Q8W), duration of response, and progression-free survival. Key inclusion criteria include histologically or cytologically proven metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiation for which standard therapies have been exhausted or not available. Prior anti-PD-(L)1 or other checkpoint inhibitors were not allowed. Five dose-finding cohorts, including 2 expansion cohorts, ranged from 3–20 patients each. AMG 404 was given until disease progression, intolerance, or consent withdrawal.ResultsAs of the data cutoff date of May 4, 2020, 62 patients received at least 1 dose of AMG 404 and were included in the safety and efficacy analysis sets. Fifty percent were men, 72% had ECOG 1 performance status, median age was 62 years (range: 28–83), and 42% had ≥3 lines of prior anticancer therapy. Median AMG 404 exposure was ~3 months (maximum: ~12 months). No DLTs were observed. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported for 29 patients (47%): those reported for ≥2 patients were fatigue (n=7); hypothyroidism (n=6); increased blood thyroid stimulating hormone and nausea (n=4 each); increased aspartate aminotransferase, decreased appetite, and pyrexia (n=3 each); and increased alanine aminotransferase, arthralgia, diarrhea, and increased weight (n=2 each). AEs leading to withdrawal of AMG 404 were reported for 3 patients (5%); all were serious and considered to be not related to AMG 404. Sixteen (26%) patients died on study; no deaths were considered related to AMG 404. Preliminary pharmacokinetic results were consistent with those of other therapeutic anti-PD-1 mAbs. Three patients had a confirmed partial response (pancreatic cancer, clear cell cancer, and pleomorphic sarcoma); an additional 4 patients had one scan with a partial response and are pending a confirmatory scan (clear cell renal carcinoma, undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma of unknown primary, and colon cancer).ConclusionsAMG 404 is tolerable at the tested doses with no DLTs reported. All observed TRAEs are consistent with other anti-PD-1 therapies. Encouraging anti-tumor activity has been observed in heavily pretreated patients. The study is continuing enrollment into additional cohorts.Trial RegistrationNCT03853109Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by the Ethics Board of each institution involved in this study and can be produced upon request.

scholarly journals A phase 1, open-label, drug–drug interaction study of rucaparib with rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxiang Liao ◽  
Krzysztof G. Jeziorski ◽  
Monika Tomaszewska-Kiecana ◽  
István Láng ◽  
Marek Jasiówka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Oral Contraceptives ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction

Abstract Purpose This study aimed at evaluating the effect of rucaparib on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives in patients with advanced solid tumors and the safety of rucaparib with and without coadministration of rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives. Methods Patients received single doses of oral rosuvastatin 20 mg (Arm A) or oral contraceptives ethinylestradiol 30 µg + levonorgestrel 150 µg (Arm B) on days 1 and 19 and continuous doses of rucaparib 600 mg BID from day 5 to 23. Serial blood samples were collected with and without rucaparib for pharmacokinetic analysis. Results Thirty-six patients (n = 18 each arm) were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of study drug. In the drug–drug interaction analysis (n = 15 each arm), the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of maximum concentration (Cmax) with and without rucaparib was 1.29 for rosuvastatin, 1.09 for ethinylestradiol, and 1.19 for levonorgestrel. GMR of area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to last quantifiable measurement (AUC0–last) was 1.34 for rosuvastatin, 1.43 for ethinylestradiol, and 1.56 for levonorgestrel. There was no increase in frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) when rucaparib was given with either of the probe drugs. In both arms, most TEAEs were mild in severity and considered unrelated to study treatment. Conclusion Rucaparib 600 mg BID weakly increased the plasma exposure to rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives. Rucaparib safety profile when coadministered with rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives was consistent with that of rucaparib monotherapy. Dose adjustments of rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives are not necessary when coadministered with rucaparib. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03954366; Date of registration May 17, 2019.

scholarly journals Safety and clinical activity of intratumoral MEDI9197 alone and in combination with durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Siu ◽  
Joshua Brody ◽  
Shilpa Gupta ◽  
Aurélien Marabelle ◽  
Antonio Jimeno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Palliative Radiation ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Palliative Radiation Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundMEDI9197 is an intratumorally administered toll-like receptor 7 and 8 agonist. In mice, MEDI9197 modulated antitumor immune responses, inhibited tumor growth and increased survival. This first-time-in-human, phase 1 study evaluated MEDI9197 with or without the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced solid tumors.Patients and methodsEligible patients had at least one cutaneous, subcutaneous, or deep-seated lesion suitable for intratumoral (IT) injection. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design. Patients received IT MEDI9197 0.005–0.055 mg with or without RT (part 1), or IT MEDI9197 0.005 or 0.012 mg plus durvalumab 1500 mg intravenous with or without RT (part 3), in 4-week cycles. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and objective response based on Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors version 1.1. Exploratory endpoints included tumor and peripheral biomarkers that correlate with biological activity or predict response.ResultsFrom November 2015 to March 2018, part 1 enrolled 35 patients and part 3 enrolled 17 patients; five in part 1 and 2 in part 3 received RT. The maximum tolerated dose of MEDI9197 monotherapy was 0.037 mg, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of cytokine release syndrome in two patients (one grade 3, one grade 4) and 0.012 mg in combination with durvalumab 1500 mg with DLT of MEDI9197-related hemorrhagic shock in one patient (grade 5) following liver metastasis rupture after two cycles of MEDI9197. Across parts 1 and 3, the most frequent MEDI9197-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade were fever (56%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (21%). The most frequent MEDI9197-related grade ≥3 events were decreased lymphocytes (15%), neutrophils (10%), and white cell counts (10%). MEDI9197 increased tumoral CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells, inducing type 1 and 2 interferons and Th1 response. There were no objective clinical responses; 10 patients in part 1 and 3 patients in part 3 had stable disease ≥8 weeks.ConclusionIT MEDI9197 was feasible for subcutaneous/cutaneous lesions but AEs precluded its use in deep-seated lesions. Although no patients responded, MEDI9197 induced systemic and intratumoral immune activation, indicating potential value in combination regimens in other patient populations.Trial registration numberNCT02556463.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document