Meds vs. Machine: a DVT Prophylaxis Debate

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
DAMIAN McNAMARA
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Mitchel L. Zoler ◽  
Doug Brunk

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-167
Author(s):  
Andrew Bircher ◽  
Alexander Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Agu ◽  
A. Handa ◽  
G Hamilton ◽  
D. M. Baker

Objective: To audit the prescription and implementation of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis in general surgical patients in a teaching hospital. Methods: All inpatients on three general surgical wards were audited for adequacy of prescription and implementation prophylaxis (audit A). A repeat audit 3 months later (audit B) closed the loop. The groups were compared using the chi-square test. Results: In audit A 50 patients participated. Prophylaxis was correctly prescribed in 36 (72%) and implemented in 30 (60%) patients. Eighteen patients at moderate or high risk (45%) received inadequate prophylaxis. Emergency admission, pre-operative stay and inadequate risk assignment were associated with poor implementation of protocol. In audit B 51 patients participated. Prescription was appropriate in 45 (88%) and implementation in 40 (78%) patients (p< 0.05). Eleven patients at moderate or high risk received inadequate prophylaxis. Seven of 11 high-risk patients in audit A (64%) received adequate prophylaxis, in contrast to all high-risk patients in audit B. The decision not to administer prophylaxis was deemed appropriate in 5 of 15 (30%) in audit A compared with 6 of 10 (60%) in audit B. Conclusion: Increased awareness, adequate risk assessment, updating of protocols and consistent reminders to staff and patients may improve implementation of DVT prophylaxis.


Author(s):  
Granit Molliqaj ◽  
Matthias Robin ◽  
Christoph Czarnetzki ◽  
Marie-Josée Daly ◽  
Americo Agostinho ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 258
Author(s):  
Geoffrey H. Westrich ◽  
Thomas Sculco ◽  
Richard Laskin ◽  
Russell Windsor ◽  
Steven Haas
Keyword(s):  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (4) ◽  
pp. 236A
Author(s):  
Anuj R. Kandel ◽  
Gary Deutsch ◽  
Neeti Pokharel ◽  
Denis Knobel ◽  
Corrado Marini ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
pp. 405-415
Author(s):  
Keith D. Baldwin ◽  
Surena Namdari ◽  
Samir Mehta

2011 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Khaldi ◽  
Naseem Helo ◽  
Michael J. Schneck ◽  
Thomas C. Origitano

Object Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a combination of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major cause of morbidity and death in neurosurgical patients. This study evaluates 1) the risk of developing lower-extremity DVT following a neurosurgical procedure; 2) the timing of initiation of pharmacological DVT prophylaxis upon the occurrence of VTE; and 3) the relationship between DVT and PE as related to VTE prophylaxis in neurosurgical patients. Methods The records of all neurosurgical patients between January 2006 and December 2008 (2638 total) were reviewed for clinical documentation of VTE. As part of a quality improvement initiative, a subgroup of 1638 patients was studied during the implementation of pharmacological prophylaxis. A high-risk group of 555 neurosurgical patients in the intensive care unit underwent surveillance venous lower-extremity duplex ultrasonography studies twice weekly. All patients throughout the review received mechanical DVT prophylaxis. Pharmacological DVT prophylaxis, consisting of 5000 U of subcutaneous heparin twice daily (initially started within 48 hours of a neurosurgical procedure and subsequently within 24 hours of a procedure) was implemented in combination with mechanical prophylaxis. The DVT and PE rates were calculated for each group. Results In the surveillance group (555 patients), 84% of the DVTs occurred within 1 week and 92% within 2 weeks of a neurosurgical procedure. There was a linear correlation between the duration of surgery and DVT development. The use of subcutaneous heparin reduced the rate of DVT from 16% to 9% when medication was given at either 24 or 48 hours postoperatively, without any increase in hemorrhagic complications. In the overall group (2638 patients), there were 94 patients who exhibited clinical signs of a possible PE and therefore underwent spiral CT; 22 of these patients (0.8%) had radiological confirmation of PE. There was no correlation between the use of pharmacological prophylaxis at either time point and the occurrence of PE, despite a 43% reduction in the lower-extremity DVT rate with pharmacological intervention. Conclusions The majority of DVTs occurred within the first week after a neurosurgical procedure. There was a linear correlation between the duration of surgery and DVT occurrence. Use of early subcutaneous heparin (at either 24 or 48 hours) was associated with a 43% reduction of developing a lower-extremity DVT, without an increase in surgical site hemorrhage. There was no association of pharmacological prophylaxis with overall PE occurrence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document