P096: Risk for early unplanned rehospitalization of older adults after an ED visit: role of the caregiver burden

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. S112
Author(s):  
S. Bonin-Guillaume ◽  
A.C. Durand ◽  
F. Yahi ◽  
M. Curiel Berruyer ◽  
O. Lacroix ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 493-493
Author(s):  
Jiaming Liang ◽  
Maria Aranda

Abstract In addition to primary caregivers, many older adults receive care from secondary care networks (SCN), which include family members and friends. Literature rarely considers support that SCN provided to primary caregivers. This study examines: (a) the association between SCN support and primary caregiver burden, and (b) the intersectional effects of gender (male/female)-race (White/Black) identities of primary caregivers on the association. A cross-sectional study using data from 2015 National Health and Aging Trend Study (NHATS) and National Study of Caregiving (NSOC) was conducted. A total of 967 older adults, 967 primary caregivers, and 2253 secondary caregivers were selected. SCN support was measured by (a) care domain overlap, and (b) proportion of caregiving by SCN. Negative binomial regressions on overall and split samples estimated main effects of SCN support and the intersectional effects of gender and race. Both SCN-related variables were associated with primary caregiver burden, but significant three-way interaction was only found between gender, race, and proportion of caregiving by SCN. Black female caregivers reported heaviest burden and having SCN support was associated with lower risk of being burdened. Whereas Black male caregivers reported lightest burden and SCN support was not associated with their perceived burden. Our findings support the positive role of SCN in reducing stress of primary caregivers, and demonstrate that positive impacts of SCN support vary across gender-race groups. The results indicate a strong need for support programs aimed at promoting cooperation among family caregivers for burden reduction, especially families with female and Black primary caregivers.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 883-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Bonin-Guillaume ◽  
Anne-Claire Durand ◽  
Fadila Yahi ◽  
Marielle Curiel-Berruyer ◽  
Oceana Lacroix ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Sun ◽  
Disa Sauter

Getting old is generally seen as unappealing, yet aging confers considerable advantages in several psychological domains (North & Fiske, 2015). In particular, older adults are better off emotionally than younger adults, with aging associated with the so-called “age advantages,” that is, more positive and less negative emotional experiences (Carstensen et al., 2011). Although the age advantages are well established, it is less clear whether they occur under conditions of prolonged stress. In a recent study, Carstensen et al (2020) demonstrated that the age advantages persist during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that older adults are able to utilise cognitive and behavioural strategies to ameliorate even sustained stress. Here, we build on Carstensen and colleagues’ work with two studies. In Study 1, we provide a large-scale test of the robustness of Carstensen and colleagues’ finding that older individuals experience more positive and less negative emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic. We measured positive and negative emotions along with age information in 23,629 participants in 63 countries in April-May 2020. In Study 2, we provide a comparison of the age advantages using representative samples collected before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We demonstrate that older people experience less negative emotion than younger people during the prolonged stress of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the advantage of older adults was diminished during the pandemic, pointing to a likely role of older adults use of situation selection strategies (Charles, 2010).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document