P-117: Multiple Myeloma treatment patterns and outcomes in the public and private healthcare systems in Brazil: one country, two worlds

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S98-S99
Author(s):  
Vania Hungria ◽  
Rosane Bittencourt ◽  
Gracia Martinez ◽  
Juliana santos ◽  
Denise Almeida ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e0227776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Weitzel ◽  
Fernanda Rodríguez ◽  
Luis Miguel Noriega ◽  
Alejandra Marcotti ◽  
Luisa Duran ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felippe Leopoldo Dexheimer Neto ◽  
Regis Goulart Rosa ◽  
Bruno Achutti Duso ◽  
Jaqueline Sanguiogo Haas ◽  
Augusto Savi ◽  
...  

Purpose.The long-term outcomes of patients after discharge from tertiary ICUs as they relate to the public versus private healthcare systems in Brazil have not yet been evaluated.Materials and Methods.A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted to compare the all-cause mortality and the physical functional status (PFS) 24 months after discharge from the ICU between adult patients treated in the public and private healthcare systems. A propensity score- (PS-) matched comparison of all causes of mortality and PFS 24 months after discharge from the ICU was performed.Results.In total, 928 patients were discharged from the ICU including 172 (18.6%) patients in the public and 756 (81.4%) patients in the private healthcare system. The results of the PS-matched comparison of all-cause mortality revealed higher mortality rates among the patients of the public healthcare system compared to those of the private healthcare system (47.3% versus 27.6%,P=0.003). The comparison of the PS-matched Karnofsky performance and Lawton activities of daily living scores between the ICU survivors of the public and private healthcare systems revealed no significant differences.Conclusions.The patients of private healthcare system exhibited significantly greater survival rates than the patients of the public healthcare system with similar PFS following ICU discharge.


2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Bissacotti Steglich ◽  
Silvana Cardoso ◽  
Maria Helena da Costa Naumann Gaertner ◽  
Karina Munhoz de Paula Alves Coelho ◽  
Tania Ferreira Cestari ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ching Siang Tan ◽  
Saim Lokman ◽  
Yao Rao ◽  
Szu Hua Kok ◽  
Long Chiau Ming

AbstractOver the last year, the dangerous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread rapidly around the world. Malaysia has not been excluded from this COVID-19 pandemic. The resurgence of COVID-19 cases has overwhelmed the public healthcare system and overloaded the healthcare resources. Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia has adopted an Emergency Ordinance (EO) to instruct private hospitals to receive both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients to reduce the strain on public facilities. The treatment of COVID-19 patients at private hospitals could help to boost the bed and critical care occupancy. However, with the absence of insurance coverage because COVID-19 is categorised as pandemic-related diseases, there are some challenges and opportunities posed by the treatment fees management. Another major issue in the collaboration between public and private hospitals is the willingness of private medical consultants to participate in the management of COVID-19 patients, because medical consultants in private hospitals in Malaysia are not hospital employees, but what are termed “private contractors” who provide patient care services to the hospitals. Other collaborative measures with private healthcare providers, e.g. tele-conferencing by private medical clinics to monitor COVID-19 patients and the rollout of national vaccination programme. The public and private healthcare partnership must be enhanced, and continue to find effective ways to collaborate further to combat the pandemic. The MOH, private healthcare sectors and insurance providers need to have a synergistic COVID-19 treatment plans to ensure public as well as insurance policy holders have equal opportunities for COVID-19 screening tests, vaccinations and treatment.


Author(s):  
Jussiely Cunha Oliveira ◽  
Laís Costa Souza Oliveira ◽  
Jeferson Cunha Oliveira ◽  
Ikaro Daniel de Carvalho Barreto ◽  
Marcos Antonio Almeida-Santos ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 574-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Lewis ◽  
Fran Collyer ◽  
Karen Willis ◽  
Kirsten Harley ◽  
Kanchan Marcus ◽  
...  

This article reports on a discourse analysis of the representation of healthcare in the print news media, and the way this representation shapes perspectives of healthcare. We analysed news items from six major Australian newspapers over a three-year time period. We show how various framing devices promote ideas about a crisis in the current public healthcare system, the existence of a precarious balance between the public and private health sectors, and the benefits of private healthcare. We employ Bourdieu’s concepts of field and capital to demonstrate the processes through which these devices are employed to conceal the power relations operating in the healthcare sector, to obscure the identity of those who gain the most from the expansion of private sector medicine, and to indirectly increase health inequalities.


Author(s):  
Fabio Peixoto Ganassin ◽  
Marcelo José de Carvalho Cantarelli ◽  
Hélio José Castello Junior ◽  
Rosaly Gonçalves ◽  
Silvio Gioppato ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document