Risk Analysis and the Ethics of Technological Risk

2021 ◽  
pp. 23-52
Science ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 208 (4448) ◽  
pp. 1114-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chauncey Starr ◽  
Chris Whipple

The analytical approaches utilized for evaluating the acceptability of technological risk originate from analogies to financial cost-benefit risk analysis. These analogies appear generally valid for viewing risk from a societal basis, but are not applicable to individual risk assessments. Conflicts arising from these different views of risk assessment provide insights to the origins of individual, intuitive evaluations. Societal risk decisions made under conflict represent political compromises, and the resulting decision process creates substantial conflict costs. The pragmatic use of quantitative risk criteria (safety targets) may be useful in reducing these costs.


2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Schönebeck ◽  
B Reiter ◽  
O Haye ◽  
D Böhm ◽  
M Ismail ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 60-77
Author(s):  
E. V. Vasilieva ◽  
T. V. Gaibova

This paper describes the method of project risk analysis based on design thinking and explores the possibility of its application for industrial investment projects. Traditional and suggested approaches to project risk management have been compared. Several risk analysis artifacts have been added to the standard list of artifacts. An iterative procedure for the formation of risk analysis artifacts has been developed, with the purpose of integrating the risk management process into strategic and prompt decision-making during project management. A list of tools at each stage of design thinking for risk management within the framework of real investment projects has been proposed. The suggested technology helps to determine project objectives and content and adapt them in regards to possible; as well as to implement measures aimed at reducing these risks, to increase productivity of the existing risk assessment and risk management tools, to organize effective cooperation between project team members, and to promote accumulation of knowledge about the project during its development and implementation.The authors declare no conflict of interest.


1988 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 260-267
Author(s):  
Kazuo Takaragi ◽  
Ryoichi Sasaki ◽  
Yasuhiko Nagai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document