Trust Law in Asian Civil Law Jurisdictions

Keyword(s):  
Global Jurist ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Terranova

AbstractLegal transplants are considered a significant factor in the evolution of legal systems. One example of transplant of a legal institution through its prestige is the diffusion of the trust from the English legal system to other common law systems and to many civil law countries. One of these is China that in 2001 enacted the Trust Law of the People’s Republic of China. This paper wants to analyse the trust under the Trust Law and to compare it with the original model in the English legal system, understanding how far or how close it is from the original one.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Spivack

AbstractCivil law regimes in Europe have been cautiously open to the common law trust for commercial purposes, and to some forms of the private trust as well. This openness indicates that the time may be right to issue a warning to civil lawyers about the recent proliferation of highly problematic forms of the trust in the U. S., and to offer an explanation of the dysfunction which allowed these trusts to win legislative approval. Civil law may be less amenable to these forms of trust for reasons of social policy and legal philosophy as expressed in foundational legal texts. Recent changes to EU trust law and to French and Dutch tax law indicate that this may be the case. This article discusses these new trust forms and discusses some elements of civil law which, at least from a common lawyer’s perspective, offer some resistance to them.


2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 441-467
Author(s):  
Ying-Chieh Wu

Abstract This Article suggests that the trust envisaged by a Northeast Asian lawyer is not like the trust a common lawyer would generally conceptualize, and that a structurally different species of trust has been reconstructed and reimagined in Northeast Asia. Trust law can be transplanted, yet some of its rules are too cumbersome to be accepted directly. This ultimately calls for modifications of some of the features of the common law trust, which happened in Northeast Asia when trust law was transplanted into Romano-Germanic civil law culture, culminating in a type of civil law trust. This Article explains how the doctrinal conflicts between the civil law tradition and the common law trust have been resolved by examining the transformations that took place in the course of the transplantation process and how these conflicts created a distinctive underlying structure of the trust in Northeast Asia. Many compromises and modifications were made to pare down conflicts arising from grafting the common law-based trust onto Romano-Germanic soil. However, adopting modified trusts unexpectedly led to the dilution of some of the traditional rules in the civil codes. These alterations and the ensuing discordance with some presently well-settled civil law theories are the core themes of this Article.


Author(s):  
Diana Vivcharuk

Purpose. The purpose of the article is the regulation of relations on the principles of civil law. Methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and a synthesis of available scientific and theoretical information. It is includes the formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. Such methods of scientific knowledge were used: terminological, functional, systemic-structural, logical-normative. Results: it was determined, that principles of civil law – an ideas of the civil law, that characterized by systematic,versatile, more stable, more regylated. Originality. An article is the special reseach that explores the problems of civil law in Ukraine. Practical significance. The results of the research can be used in legislation and law-enforcement activities.


1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W Cairns

This article, in earlier versions presented as a paper to the Edinburgh Roman Law Group on 10 December 1993 and to the joint meeting of the London Roman Law Group and London Legal History Seminar on 7 February 1997, addresses the puzzle of the end of law teaching in the Scottish universities at the start of the seventeenth century at the very time when there was strong pressure for the advocates of the Scots bar to have an academic education in Civil Law. It demonstrates that the answer is to be found in the life of William Welwood, the last Professor of Law in St Andrews, while making some general points about bloodfeud in Scotland, the legal culture of the sixteenth century, and the implications of this for Scottish legal history. It is in two parts, the second of which will appear in the next issue of the Edinburgh Law Review.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-378
Author(s):  
Kyumson Seo ◽  
◽  
Kyoungjin Choi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document