39901 Breaking down silos to synergize clinical trial development and initiation: The Clinical Research Support Center, University of Minnesota

Background:Under European Union (EU) Clinical Trial regulations,1clinical research sponsors (CRSs) must ensure all studies performed in the EU are accompanied by a trial summary for laypersons, published within 1 year of study completion. These lay summaries should disseminate clinical trial results in an easy-to-understand way for trial participants, patient and caregiver communities, and the general public. The European Patients Forum (EPF)2and European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI)3encourage CRSs to engage with patient organisations (POs) in the development of lay summaries. This recognises the patients’ contribution to clinical research and supports the development of patient-focused material.Objectives:We share learnings from a collaboration between scleroderma POs and a CRS to create the SENSCIS® trial (NCT02597933) written and video lay summaries.Methods:A community advisory board (CAB), comprising representatives from 11 scleroderma POs covering a range of countries/regions, was formed based on the EURORDIS charter for collaboration in clinical research.4Through three structured meetings, over a seven-month period, the CAB provided advice on lay summary materials (written and video) drafted by the CRS’ Lay Summary Group (Fig. 1). At each review cycle, the CAB advice was addressed to make content more understandable and more relevant for patients and the general public.Results:The CAB advised that the existence of lay summaries is not well known in the patient community and also recommended the development of trial-specific lay summary videos to further improve understandability of the clinical trial results for the general public. Videos are a key channel of communication, enabling access to information for people with specific health needs and lower literacy levels. Following CAB advice, the CRS developed a stand-alone video entitled“What are lay summaries?”and a trial-specific lay summary video. Revisions to lay summary content (written and video) included colour schemes, iconography and language changes to make content more understandable. For videos, adjustments to animation speed, script and voiceover were implemented to improve clarity and flow of information (Fig. 2). Approved final versions of lay summary materials are publicly available on the CRS website. Translation into languages representing trial-site countries is in progress to widen access to non-English speakers and, where possible, local versions are being reviewed by the patient community.Conclusion:Structured collection and implementation of CAB advice can make lay summary materials more understandable for the patient community and wider general public.References:[1]EU. Summaries of clinical trial results for laypersons. 2018[2]EPF. EPF position: clinical trial results – communication of the lay summary. 2015[3]EUPATI. Guidance for patient involvement in ethical review of clinical trials. 2018[4]EURORDIS. Charter for Collaboration in Clinical Research in Rare Diseases. 2009Disclosure of Interests:Joep Welling Speakers bureau: Four times as a patient advocate for employees of BII and BI MIDI with a fixed amount of € 150,00 per occasion., Annelise Roennow: None declared, Maureen Sauvé Grant/research support from: Educational grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen., EDITH BROWN: None declared, Ilaria Galetti: None declared, Alex Gonzalez Consultant of: Payment made to the patient organisation (Scleroderma Research Foundation) for participation in advisory boards, Alexandra Paula Portales Guiraud: None declared, Ann Kennedy Grant/research support from: AS FESCA aisbl, Catarina Leite: None declared, Robert J. Riggs: None declared, Alison Zheng Grant/research support from: We get grants from Lorem Vascular; BI China,; Jianke Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Kangjing Biological Co., Ltd.; COFCO Coca-Cola to organize national scleroderma meetings, offer patients service, holding academic meetings and other public activities, there is also a small part of the grants used to pay the workers in our organization., Consultant of: I worked as a paid consultant for BI. Pay-per-job., Speakers bureau: I was invited once to be a speaker at BI China’s internal meeting and they paid me., Matea Perkovic Popovic: None declared, Annie Gilbert Consultant of: I have worked as a paid consultant with BI International for over 3 years, since Sept 2016., Lizette Moros Employee of: Lizette Moros is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Kamila Sroka-Saidi Employee of: Paid employee of Boehringer Ingelheim., Thomas Schindler Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Henrik Finnern Employee of: Paid employee of Boehringer Ingelheim.

Download Full-text

The Use of Digital Clinical Trial Methods in the Evaluation of Digital Therapeutics: A Scoping Review (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.17630 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Allison Hirsch ◽

Mahip Grewal ◽

Anthony James Martorell ◽

Brian Michael Iacoviello

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Clinical Research ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Digital Technologies ◽

Good Clinical Practice ◽

The United States ◽

Clinical Trial Research ◽

Digital Methods ◽

Clinical Trial Methods

BACKGROUND Digital Therapeutics (DTx) provide evidence based therapeutic health interventions that have been clinically validated to deliver therapeutic outcomes, such that the software is the treatment. Digital methodologies are increasingly adopted to conduct clinical trials due to advantages they provide including increases in efficiency and decreases in trial costs. Digital therapeutics are digital by design and can leverage the potential of digital and remote clinical trial methods. OBJECTIVE The principal purpose of this scoping review is to review the literature to determine whether digital technologies are being used in DTx clinical research, which type are being used and whether publications are noting any advantages to their use. As DTx development is an emerging field there are likely gaps in the knowledge base regarding DTx and clinical trials, and the purpose of this review is to illuminate those gaps. A secondary purpose is to consider questions which emerged during the review process including whether fully remote digital clinical research is appropriate for all health conditions and whether digital clinical trial methods are inline with the principles of Good Clinical Practice. METHODS 1,326 records were identified by searching research databases and 1,227 reviewed at the full-article level in order to determine if they were appropriate for inclusion. Confirmation of clinical trial status, use of digital clinical research methods and digital therapeutic status as well as inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied in order to determine relevant articles. Digital methods employed in DTx research were extracted from each article and these data were synthesized in order to determine which digital methods are currently used in clinical trial research. RESULTS After applying our criteria for scoping review inclusion, 11 articles were identified. All articles used at least one form of digital clinical research methodology enabling an element of remote research. The most commonly used digital methods are those related to recruitment, enrollment and the assessment of outcomes. A small number of articles reported using other methods such as online compensation (n = 3), or digital reminders for participants (n = 5). The majority of digital therapeutics clinical research using digital methods is conducted in the United States and increasing number of articles using digital methods are published each year. CONCLUSIONS Digital methods are used in clinical trial research evaluating DTx, though not frequently as evidenced by the low proportion of articles included in this review. Fully remote clinical trial research is not yet the standard, more frequently authors are using partially remote methods. Additionally, there is tremendous variability in the level of detail describing digital methods within the literature. As digital technologies continue to advance and the clinical research DTx literature matures, digital methods which facilitate remote research may be used more frequently.

Download Full-text

10040 Proactive and responsive COVID-19 multidisciplinary research support through the University of Minnesota’s Clinical Research Support Center

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science ◽

10.1017/cts.2021.676 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-2

Author(s):

Brian L. Odlaug ◽

Francoise Crevel ◽

Nicole Tosun ◽

Ryan Lee ◽

Carrie McKenzie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Research ◽

Multidisciplinary Research ◽

Research Support ◽

The University

Download Full-text

THU0528 NAILFOLD VIDEOCAPILLAROSCOPY REPORTING IN CLINICAL RESEARCH: INTERNATIONAL DELPHI BASED CONSENSUS

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2415 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 503.1-504

Author(s):

F. Ingegnoli ◽

T. Schioppo ◽

A. Herrick ◽

A. Sulli ◽

F. Bartoli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Clinical Research ◽

Rheumatic Diseases ◽

Unmet Need ◽

Future Research ◽

Invasive Technique ◽

Delphi Consensus ◽

Research Support ◽

The Impact ◽

Research Studies

Background:Nailfold capillaroscopy (NVC), a non-invasive technique to assess microcirculation, is increasingly being incorporated into rheumatology routine clinical practice. Currently, the degree of description of NVC methods varies amongst research studies, making interpretation and comparison between studies challenging. In this field, an unmet need is the standardization of items to be reported in research studies using NVC.Objectives:To perform a Delphi consensus on minimum reporting standards in methodology for clinical research, based on the items derived from a systematic review focused on this topic.Methods:The systematic review of the literature on NVC methodology relating to rheumatic diseases was performed according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42018104660) to July 22nd2018 using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus. Then, a three-step web-based Delphi consensus was performed in between members of the EULAR study group on microcirculation in rheumatic diseases and the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium. Participants were asked to rate each item from 1 (not appropriate) to 9 (completely appropriate).Results:In total, 3491 references were retrieved in the initial search strategy, 2862 were excluded as duplicates or after title/abstract screening. 632 articles were retrieved for full paper review of which 319 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Regarding patient preparation before the exam, data were scarce: 38% reported acclimatization, 5% to avoid caffeine and smoking, 3% to wash hands and 2% to avoid manicure. Concerning the device description: 90% reported type of instrument, 77% brand/model, 72% magnification, 46% oil use, 40% room temperature and 35% software for image analysis. As regards to examination details: 76% which fingers examined, 75% number of fingers examined, 15% operator experience, 13% reason for finger exclusion, 9% number of images, 8% quality check of the images and 3% time spent for the exam. Then, a three-round Delphi consensus on the selected items was completed by 80 participants internationally, from 31 countries located in Australia, Asia, Europe, North and South America. Some items reached the agreement at the second round (85 participants), and other items were suggested as important to consider in a future research agenda (e.g. temperature for acclimatization, the impact of smoking, allergies at the application of the oil to the nailbed, significance of pericapillary edema, methods of reporting hemorrhages, ramified and giant capillaries). The final agreement results are reported below:Conclusion:On the basis of the available literature the description of NVC methods was highly heterogeneous and individual published studies differed markedly. These practical suggestions developed using a Delphi process among international participants provide a guidance to improve and to standardize the NVC methodology in future clinical research studies.Disclosure of Interests:Francesca Ingegnoli: None declared, Tommaso Schioppo: None declared, Ariane Herrick: None declared, Alberto Sulli Grant/research support from: Laboratori Baldacci, Francesca Bartoli: None declared, Nicola Ughi: None declared, John Pauling: None declared, Maurizio Cutolo Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Actelion, Celgene, Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Sigma-Alpha, Vanessa Smith Grant/research support from: The affiliated company received grants from Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and Janssen-Cilag NV, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and UCB Biopharma Sprl

Download Full-text

Shared-Task Worklists Improve Clinical Trial Recruitment Workflow in an Academic Emergency Department

Applied Clinical Informatics ◽

10.1055/s-0041-1727153 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 (02) ◽

pp. 293-300

Author(s):

Kevin S. Naceanceno ◽

Stacey L. House ◽

Phillip V. Asaro

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Emergency Department ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Clinical Research ◽

Substantial Reduction ◽

Text Message ◽

High Volume ◽

Text Messages ◽

Shared Task ◽

Clinical Research Coordinators

Abstract Background Clinical trials performed in our emergency department at Barnes-Jewish Hospital utilize a centralized infrastructure for alerting, screening, and enrollment with rule-based alerts sent to clinical research coordinators. Previously, all alerts were delivered as text messages via dedicated cellular phones. As the number of ongoing clinical trials increased, the volume of alerts grew to an unmanageable level. Therefore, we have changed our primary notification delivery method to study-specific, shared-task worklists integrated with our pre-existing web-based screening documentation system. Objective To evaluate the effects on screening and recruitment workflow of replacing text-message delivery of clinical trial alerts with study-specific shared-task worklists in a high-volume academic emergency department supporting multiple concurrent clinical trials. Methods We analyzed retrospective data on alerting, screening, and enrollment for 10 active clinical trials pre- and postimplementation of shared-task worklists. Results Notifications signaling the presence of potentially eligible subjects for clinical trials were more likely to result in a screen (p < 0.001) with the implementation of shared-task worklists compared with notifications delivered as text messages for 8/10 clinical trials. The change in workflow did not alter the likelihood of a notification resulting in an enrollment (p = 0.473). The Director of Research reported a substantial reduction in the amount of time spent redirecting clinical research coordinator screening activities. Conclusion Shared-task worklists, with the functionalities we have described, offer a viable alternative to delivery of clinical trial alerts via text message directly to clinical research coordinators recruiting for multiple concurrent clinical trials in a high-volume academic emergency department.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of Suxiao Jiuxin Pill in the treatment of stable angina (Qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome): study protocol of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center clinical trial

Trials ◽

10.1186/s13063-021-05448-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Xiaofen Ruan ◽

Yiping Li ◽

Yuanlong Sun ◽

Meijun Jia ◽

Xiaowen Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Clinical Research ◽

Stable Angina ◽

Conventional Therapy ◽

Blood Stasis ◽

Chronic Stable Angina ◽

Blood Stasis Syndrome ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Qi Stagnation

Abstract Background Coronary heart disease (CHD) has become one of the biggest health problems in the world. Stable angina is a common clinical type of CHD with poor prognosis and high mortality. Although there are various interventions for stable angina, none of them can significantly reduce mortality. Both basic and clinical research have shown that Suxiao Jiuxin Pill (SJP) can relieve the symptoms of angina pectoris and improve the clinical efficacy, but there is a lack of high-quality clinical research to provide research-based evidence. We design a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of SJP for stable angina. Methods/design This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and multicenter trial. The trial will enroll 324 participants with chronic stable angina (Qi Stagnation and Blood Stasis syndrome). All participants will have received the conventional therapy of chronic stable angina. Participants will be randomized into two groups, conventional therapy plus SJP group and conventional therapy plus placebo group. Eligible participants will receive either SJP or placebo (five pills administered orally, three times daily) in addition to conventional treatment for 24 weeks. The primary outcomes are the symptom improvement rate of angina from baseline to 4 weeks after inclusion and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The secondary outcomes are angina classification (CCS), improvement of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndromes, Seattle Angina Scale score, the dosage of emergency drugs and the stopping rate, and electrocardiogram (EKG) efficacy. Adverse events will be monitored throughout the trial. Discussion Integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine is commonly used for angina in China. This study will evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of SJP for angina. The results of the trial will provide high-level clinical research-based evidence for the application of SJP instable angina. Trial registration This study protocol was registered on 14 March 2019. The registration number is ChiCTR1900021876 on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.

Download Full-text

Adaptive Semantic Tag Mining from Heterogeneous Clinical Research Texts

Methods of Information in Medicine ◽

10.3414/me13-01-0130 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 54 (02) ◽

pp. 164-170 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

T. Hao ◽

C. Weng

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Clinical Research ◽

Architectural Design ◽

Semantic Equivalence ◽

Clinical Text ◽

Mining Algorithm ◽

Prevalence Trends ◽

Trial Protocols ◽

Mining Methods ◽

Frequency Threshold

SummaryObjectives: To develop an adaptive approach to mine frequent semantic tags (FSTs) from heterogeneous clinical research texts.Methods: We develop a “plug-n-play” framework that integrates replaceable un-supervised kernel algorithms with formatting, functional, and utility wrappers for FST mining. Temporal information identification and semantic equivalence detection were two example functional wrappers. We first compared this approach’s recall and efficiency for mining FSTs from ClinicalTrials.gov to that of a recently published tag-mining algorithm. Then we assessed this approach’s adaptability to two other types of clinical research texts: clinical data requests and clinical trial protocols, by comparing the prevalence trends of FSTs across three texts.Results: Our approach increased the average recall and speed by 12.8% and 47.02% respectively upon the baseline when mining FSTs from ClinicalTrials.gov, and maintained an overlap in relevant FSTs with the baseline ranging between 76.9% and 100% for varying FST frequency thresholds. The FSTs saturated when the data size reached 200 documents. Consistent trends in the prevalence of FST were observed across the three texts as the data size or frequency threshold changed.Conclusions: This paper contributes an adaptive tag-mining framework that is scalable and adaptable without sacrificing its recall. This component-based architectural design can be potentially generalizable to improve the adaptability of other clinical text mining methods.

Download Full-text