scholarly journals Design thinking and computational thinking: a dual process model for addressing design problems

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Kelly ◽  
John S. Gero

Abstract This paper proposes a relationship between design thinking and computational thinking. It describes design thinking and computational thinking as two prominent ways of understanding how people address design problems. It suggests that, currently, each of design thinking and computational thinking is defined and theorized in isolation from the other. A two-dimensional ontological space of the ways that people think in addressing problems is proposed, based on the orientation of the thinker towards problem and solution generality/specificity. Placement of design thinking and computational thinking within this space and discussion of their relationship leads to the suggestion of a dual process model for addressing design problems. It suggests that, in this model, design thinking and computational thinking are processes that are ontological mirror images of each other, and are the two processes by which thinkers address problems. Thinkers can move fluently between the two. The paper makes a contribution towards the theoretical foundations of design thinking and proposes questions about how design thinking and computational thinking might be both investigated and taught as constituent parts of a dual process.

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (Extra 295) ◽  
pp. 511-521
Author(s):  
Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla

In this article I analyse the dual process model of moral judgement. First, I set out Joshua Greene’s and Jonathan Haidt’s propositions, which represent two schools of thought on this theory. Next, I conduct a number of methodological reviews. On the one hand, I argue that the method used is tautological, while on the other, I show that the use of dilemmas is not an adequate tool with which to account for moral deliberation.


SPIEL ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-145
Author(s):  
Larissa Leonhard ◽  
Anne Bartsch ◽  
Frank M. Schneider

This article presents an extended dual-process model of entertainment effects on political information processing and engagement. We suggest that entertainment consumption can either be driven by hedonic, escapist motivations that are associated with a superficial mode of information processing, or by eudaimonic, truth-seeking motivations that prompt more elaborate forms of information processing. This framework offers substantial extensions to existing dual-process models of entertainment by conceptualizing the effects of entertainment on active and reflective forms of information seeking, knowledge acquisition and political participation.


Author(s):  
Jinyun Duan ◽  
Abby Jingzi Zhou ◽  
Linhan Yu

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 75-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Chun ◽  
Phillip R. Shaver ◽  
Omri Gillath ◽  
Andrew Mathews ◽  
Terrence D. Jorgensen

2009 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antony C. Moss ◽  
Ian P. Albery

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document