Oral vancomycin prophylaxis for the prevention of Clostridium difficile infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 1302-1309
Author(s):  
Sumbal Babar ◽  
Bara El Kurdi ◽  
Mahmoud El Iskandarani ◽  
Ibrahim Haddad ◽  
Zaid Imam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Total Daily Dose ◽  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
At Risk Populations ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Egger Test

AbstractObjective:Recently, oral vancomycin prophylaxis (OVP) has been suggested for the prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of this approach.Design:Systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods:We conducted a computerized search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to March 2019 for publications investigating OVP for CDI prevention. Results were screened for eligibility. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger test.Results:Ultimately, 8 retrospective studies and 1 prospective study examining 2174 patients, published between 2016 and 2019 were included in the review. OVP was associated with decreased CDI (odds ratio, 0.263; 95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.52) with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 61%). Meta-regression showed that total daily dose of OVP correlated with CDI, explaining 100% of heterogeneity between studies. Furthermore, 3 studies evaluated the risk of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infection after OVP and found no significant increase.Conclusion:Our results suggest that OVP might decrease CDI rates in at-risk populations, although this conclusion should be interpreted with caution. Higher daily doses of OVP might increase CDI. Although the use of OVP in high-risk patients may reduce CDI, this suggestion has yet to be validated by prospective blinded randomized controlled trials.

Efficacy of NSAIDs versus radiotherapy for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002199111
Author(s):  
Jacob Shapira ◽  
Mitchell J Yelton ◽  
Jeffery W Chen ◽  
Philip J Rosinsky ◽  
David R Maldonado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Randomised Control Trials ◽  
Risk Patients

Background: The aims of this systematic review were: (1) to investigate the prophylactic effect of radiotherapy (RT) and NSAIDs in high-risk patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA); and (2) to compare the efficacy of non-selective and COX-II selective NSAIDs in preventing post-THA HO, utilising a meta-analysis of randomised control studies. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for articles regarding HO following THA in March 2019. Studies were included if they contained data regarding HO incidence after THA or contained data regarding HO prophylaxis comparison of NSAIDs and/or RT in terms of dosage or duration. Results: 24 studies reported on populations that were not at high-risk for HO. These studies reported between 47.3% and 90.4% of their patient populations had no HO formation; between 2.8% and 52.7% had mild formation; and between 0.0% and 10.4% had severe formation. A total of 13 studies reported on populations at high-risk for HO. Studies analysing RT in high-risk patients reported between 28.6% and 97.4% of patients developed no HO formation; between 1.9% and 66.7% developed mild HO formation; and between 0.0% and 11.9% developed severe HO formation. Studies analysing NSAID treatment among high-risk populations reported between 76.6% and 88.9% had no HO formation; between 11.1% and 23.4% had mild HO formation, and between 0.0% and 1.8% had severe HO formation. 9 studies were identified as randomised control trials and subsequently used for meta-analysis. The relative risk for COX-II in developing any HO after THA was not significantly different compared to non-selective NSAIDs (RR 1.00; CI, 0.801–1.256; p = 0.489). Conclusions: NSAIDs prophylaxis for HO may have better efficacy than RT in high-risk patients following THA. Non-selective and COX-II selective NSAIDs have comparable efficacy in preventing HO. Factors such as medical comorbidities and side-effect profile should dictate the prophylaxis recommendation.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-clinical studies

Gene Reports ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 101265
Author(s):  
Fereshteh Hasanpour ◽  
Zohreh Neyestani ◽  
Mohsen Arzanlou ◽  
Eslam Moradi-Asl ◽  
Amirhossein Sahebkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

scholarly journals Ablation rate after radioactive iodine therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer at intermediate or high risk of recurrence: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Klain ◽  
Carmela Nappi ◽  
Emilia Zampella ◽  
Valeria Cantoni ◽  
Roberta Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Ablation Rate ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Successful Ablation ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Purpose We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to investigate the successful ablation rate after radioiodine (RAI) administration in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) at intermediate-high risk of recurrence. Methods A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Results The final analysis included 9 studies accounting for 3103 patients at intermediate-high risk of recurrence. In these patients, the successful ablation rates ranged from 51 to 94% with a 71% pooled successful ablation and were higher in intermediate (72%) than in high (52%)-risk patients. Despite the rigorous inclusion standards, a significant heterogeneity among the evaluated studies was observed. Higher administered RAI activities are associated with a lower successful ablation rate in the whole population and in the subgroup of high-risk patients. Furthermore, pooled recurrence rate in intermediate-risk patients achieving successful ablation was only 2% during the subsequent 6.4-year follow-up while the pooled recurrence rate was 14% in patients who did not achieve a successful ablation. Conclusion In a large sample of 3103 patients at intermediate-high risk of persistent/recurrent disease, 71% of patients achieved a successful ablation. In these intermediate-risk patients, the probability of subsequent recurrence is low and most recurrence occurred in those with already abnormal findings at the first control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document