scholarly journals On the physical mechanisms of the two-way coupling between a surface wave field and a circulation consisting of a roll and streak

2019 ◽  
Vol 881 ◽  
pp. 906-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Suzuki

The governing equations of a surface wave field and a coexisting roll–streak circulation typical of Langmuir circulations or submesoscale frontal circulations are derived to better describe their two-way interactions. The gradients and vertical velocities of the roll–streak circulation induce wave refraction, amplitude modulation and higher-order waves. These changes then produce wave–wave nonlinear forces and divergence of the wave-induced mass transport, both of which in turn affect the circulation. To accurately represent these processes, both a wave theory and a wave-averaged theory are developed without relying on any extrapolation, any spatiotemporal mapping or an approximation that treats the wave-induced mass divergence as being concentrated at the surface. This wave theory finds seven types of current-induced higher-order wave motions. It also determines the wave dynamics such as the governing equation of the wave action density valid in the presence of the complex circulation. The evolution of the wave action density is clearly affected by the upwelling or downwelling. The new wave-averaged theory presents the governing equations of the wave-averaged circulation which satisfies the wave-averaged mass conservation. This circulation is different from the circulation considered to satisfy the mass conservation in the Craik–Leibovich theory, and the difference becomes critical when the wave field evolves due to refraction. In this case, compared to the Craik–Leibovich theory, long waves are more important and also the rolls are more weakly forced.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 2025-2036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhendong Liu ◽  
Haixing Liu ◽  
Tianyun Su ◽  
Zhen Jia ◽  
Xinfang Li ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 1 (18) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Bernard LeMehaute ◽  
James Walker ◽  
John Headland ◽  
John Wang

A method of calculating nonlinear wave induced forces and moments on piles of variable diameter is presented. The method is based on the Morrison equation and the linear wave theory with correction parameters to account for convective inertial effects in the wave field. These corrections are based on the stream function wave theory by Dean (1974). The method permits one to take into account the added wave force due to marine growth in the intertidal zone or due to a protective jacket, and can also be used to calculate forces on braces and an array of piles.


1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 55-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.R. Spedding ◽  
F.K. Browand ◽  
N.E. Huang ◽  
S.R. Long

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 1921-1939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander W. Fisher ◽  
Lawrence P. Sanford ◽  
Malcolm E. Scully ◽  
Steven E. Suttles

AbstractThe role of surface gravity waves in structuring the air–sea momentum flux is examined in the middle reaches of Chesapeake Bay. Observed wave spectra showed that wave direction in Chesapeake Bay is strongly correlated with basin geometry. Waves preferentially developed in the direction of maximum fetch, suggesting that dominant wave frequencies may be commonly and persistently misaligned with local wind forcing. Direct observations from an ultrasonic anemometer and vertical array of ADVs show that the magnitude and direction of stress changed across the air–sea interface, suggesting that a stress divergence occurred at or near the water surface. Using a numerical wave model in combination with direct flux measurements, the air–sea momentum flux was partitioned between the surface wave field and the mean flow. Results indicate that the surface wave field can store or release a significant fraction of the total momentum flux depending on the direction of the wind. When wind blew across dominant fetch axes, the generation of short gravity waves stored as much as 40% of the total wind stress. Accounting for the storage of momentum in the surface wave field closed the air–sea momentum budget. Agreement between the direction of Lagrangian shear and the direction of the stress vector in the mixed surface layer suggests that the observed directional difference was due to the combined effect of breaking waves producing downward sweeps of momentum in the direction of wave propagation and the straining of that vorticity field in a manner similar to Langmuir turbulence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document