American Family Law in Transition. By Walter O. Weyrauch, University of Florida College of Law and Sanford N. Katz, Boston College Law School. [Washington, D.C.: The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 1983. xix, 618 and (Tables and Index) 11 pp. Hardback U.S.$35·00 net.]

1984 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-190
Author(s):  
J. C. Hall
2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1289-1291

Pierre Y. Cremieux of Analysis Group Inc. reviews “Monopsony in Law and Economics” by Roger D. Blair and Jeffrey L. Harrison. The EconLit abstract of the reviewed work begins, “Expanded second edition explores the law and economics of monopsony. Discusses the antitrust laws and monopsonistic forms of conduct; the economic theory of monopsony; the antitrust response to monopsony and collusive monopsony; cooperative buying efforts; bilateral monopoly; monopsony and antitrust enforcement; monopsony in action--agricultural markets; monopsony in action--the NCAA; and monopsony in action--Physician Collective. Blair is Walter J. Matherly Professor of Economics at the University of Florida. Harrison is Stephen C. O'Connell Chair and Professor of Law at the University of Florida College of Law. Bibliography; index.”


Daedalus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
Shani M. King

The University of Florida Levin College of Law Center on Children and Families addresses the instability many children face due to a wide range of challenges. They include poverty, violence, and the criminalization of youth of color. They also include inadequate health care, substandard educational opportunity, and the general failure of systems designed to support, protect, and treat children who are classified as dependent, delinquent, or otherwise in need. The Center's model rests on five premises that Professor Barbara Woodhouse and colleagues identified in their scholarship as essential for addressing crises rather than mitigating symptoms: curriculum, scholarship, conferences, advocacy, and clinics. Over the years, the Center has held numerous conferences to advance groundbreaking, practical research on family law and children's rights and has held youth summits in connection with those conferences to engage with youth on relevant legal issues. These efforts remain at the conceptual heart/core of the Center's work.


2010 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. S152-S155
Author(s):  
Kyle E. Rarey ◽  
Maureen A. Novak ◽  
Michael L. Good

1985 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Grossberg

This essay argues for the need to study the legal history of the American family. It does so by combining a critique of secondary literature in family and legal history with examples from nineteenth-century domestic relations law. These examples, drawn from family law doctrines on seduction under the cover of a marriage promise, runaway marriages, and bastardy, are used to indicate the benefits of adding a sociocultural dimension to legal history and legal and institutional dimensions to family history. Three main themes in the history of nineteenth-century domestic relations law are developed to make these points: the law's particular fabric of issues, its distribution of authorship, and its chronological development, These themes suggest why a full understanding of the legal history of the American family requires crossing the boundaries between legal and family history.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document