scholarly journals University of Florida College of Medicine

2010 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. S152-S155
Author(s):  
Kyle E. Rarey ◽  
Maureen A. Novak ◽  
Michael L. Good
1999 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. 951-958
Author(s):  
F Courts ◽  
N Clark ◽  
T Dolan ◽  
F Catalanotto

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1289-1291

Pierre Y. Cremieux of Analysis Group Inc. reviews “Monopsony in Law and Economics” by Roger D. Blair and Jeffrey L. Harrison. The EconLit abstract of the reviewed work begins, “Expanded second edition explores the law and economics of monopsony. Discusses the antitrust laws and monopsonistic forms of conduct; the economic theory of monopsony; the antitrust response to monopsony and collusive monopsony; cooperative buying efforts; bilateral monopoly; monopsony and antitrust enforcement; monopsony in action--agricultural markets; monopsony in action--the NCAA; and monopsony in action--Physician Collective. Blair is Walter J. Matherly Professor of Economics at the University of Florida. Harrison is Stephen C. O'Connell Chair and Professor of Law at the University of Florida College of Law. Bibliography; index.”


2004 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 364-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Maksoud ◽  
Clifford B. Starr

Abstract Little data have been published on the survival rates of implants placed in dental residency programs. This study reports on the outcome of dental implants placed by first-year general dentistry residents in the University of Florida College of Dentistry–Jacksonville Clinic. The patients for this study received both surgical and restorative implant therapy from 1998 to 2002. A total of 108 patients (62 women, 46 men) were treated with dental implants. On average, a patient was 52.9 years old and received 2.6 implants. A variety of simple and complex restorative procedures were performed. Advanced general dentistry residents in conjunction with supervisory faculty treated all cases. The cumulative implant survival was 98.2%. Follow-up varied from 6 months to 4 years after placement. Cases included implants not yet loaded as well as implants loaded for 3 years or more. The findings of this study compare favorably with published studies and were unexpected in light of the residents' limited clinical experience.


2007 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neale R. Chumbler ◽  
Donald M. Cohen ◽  
Indraneel Bhattacharyya ◽  
Jean Sweitzer ◽  
Teresa A. Dolan

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 2209-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B. Munson ◽  
Richard D. Johnson ◽  
Lorne M. Mendell

We thank K. Foli for technical support and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for providing NT-3. This research was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grants NS-15913 (Javits Neuroscience Award) to J. B. Munson and NS-16996 (Javits Neuroscience Award) to L. M. Mendell. Additional support was furnished by NS-14899 and NS-32264 to L. M. Mendall. Present addresses: R. D. Johnson, Dept. of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610; L. M. Mendell, Dept. of Neurobiology and Behaviour, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794.


10.1563/807.1 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford B. Starr ◽  
Mohamed A. Maksoud

Abstract Survival rates of multiple implant designs placed in various clinical situations average more than 90%. However, little data have been published on the survival rates of implants placed in dental residency programs. This study reports on the outcome of dental implants placed by first-year general dentistry residents in the University of Florida College of Dentistry–Jacksonville Clinic. The patients for this study received both surgical and restorative implant therapy from 1998 to 2005. A total of 263 patients (147 women, 116 men) were treated with dental implants. On average, a patient was 55.5 years old and received 3 implants. A variety of simple and complex restorative procedures were performed. Advanced general dentistry residents in conjunction with supervisory faculty treated all cases. The cumulative implant survival was 96.6%. Follow-up varied from 6 months to 7 years after placement. Cases included implants not yet loaded as well as implants loaded for 6 years or more. The findings of this study compare favorably with published studies and were unexpected in light of the residents' limited clinical experience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document