La distinction rousseauiste entre volonté de tous et volonté générale : une reconstruction mathématique et ses implications pour la théorie démocratique

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radu Dobrescu
Keyword(s):  
Democratic Theory ◽  
General Will ◽  
Mathematical Argument ◽  
Mathematical Analogy

Résumé. Se situant à mi-chemin entre l'exégèse rousseauiste et la théorie démocratique, cet article vise à éclairer l'analogie mathématique mobilisée par Rousseau pour illustrer la distinction entre volonté de tous et volonté générale et à réévaluer, à la lumière de cette analogie, les débats contemporains autour de la démocratie (libérale, épistémique, délibérative). Il s'agit de régler trois problèmes qui subsistent après la restitution par Philonenko de cet argument mathématique jugé irrécupérable et de montrer que la distinction rousseauiste ainsi reconstruite peut impulser significativement les tentatives actuelles de dépasser la volonté de tous libérale pour retrouver une volonté générale épistémique ou/et délibérative.Abstract. Halfway between Rousseauian exegesis and democratic theory, this article aims at clarifying the mathematical analogy that Rousseau used to illustrate the distinction between will of all and general will, and at reassessing in the light of this analogy the contemporary debates on democracy (liberal, epistemic, deliberative). Three problems that remain after Philonenko's restitution of this mathematical argument considered unrecoverable are solved herein. It is argued that the Rousseauian distinction thus reconstructed can give significant new impetus to current attempts to go beyond the liberal will of all in order to reach an epistemic or/and deliberative general will.

3. Who Should Rule?

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Wolff
Keyword(s):  
Majority Rule ◽  
Democratic Theory ◽  
Representative Democracy ◽  
General Will ◽  
Common Assumption

This chapter considers the question of what sort of state and government we should have. A common assumption is that only a democracy is ever fully justifiable. Anything else — a tyranny, an aristocracy, an absolute monarchy — lacks justification. But what is a democracy? Is it really so attractive? The chapter explores some of the most fundamental problems in formulating democratic theory before looking at arguments for and against democracy itself. It first examines the tension between the idea of democracy as a system of ‘majority rule’, and the idea of democratic ‘consideration for individuals’. It then analyses Plato's arguments against democracy, focusing on his use of the so-called craft analogy to defend his position, along with his concept of guardianship. It also discusses Jean-Jacques Rousseau's notion of the general will and concludes with an overview of representative democracy.

Democratic Theory and the Public Interest: Condorcet and Rousseau Revisited

1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 1317-1340 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Estlund ◽  
Jeremy Waldron ◽  
Bernard Grofman ◽  
Scott L. Feld
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Political Theory ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Democratic Theory ◽  
Collective Consciousness ◽  
General Will ◽  
The Public ◽  
Condorcet’S Jury Theorem ◽  
Marquis De Condorcet ◽  
Jury Theorem

Bernard Grofman and Scott Feld argued in the June 1988 issue of this Review that Jean-Jacques Rousseau's contributions to democratic political theory could be illuminated by invoking the theorizing of one of his eighteenth-century contemporaries, the Marquis de Condorcet, about individual and collective preferences or judgments. Grofman and Feld's claims about collective consciousness and the efficacy of the public interest provoke debate. One focus of discourse lies in the application of Condorcet's jury theorem to Rousseau's theory of the general will. In this controversy David M. Estlund and Jeremy Waldron in turn raise a variety of issues of theory and interpretation; Grofman and Feld then extend their argument, and propose clarifications.

Freedom Under the General Will

2013 ◽  
Vol null (49) ◽  
pp. 85-113
Author(s):  
Jiewuh Song
Keyword(s):  
General Will

Temporary “liquid” Implant for Congenital Glaucoma (long-term results)

2020 ◽  
pp. 49-65
Author(s):  
N Bobrova ◽  
N Trofimova
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Hypotensive Effect ◽  
Congenital Glaucoma ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
General Will ◽  
Visual Functions ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
Intraocular Fluid

The aim of the work was to analyze the long-term results of using a temporary “liquid” implant in the surgery of congenital glaucoma in children. The basis of the developed method of filtrative antiglaucomatous surgery (Patent of Ukraine No. 45099 of 2009) – viscosinusotrabeculotomy – has been set the task of reducing the risk of developing intra- and postoperative complications, reducing the scarring rate and maintaining the newly created ways of the intraocular fluid outflow, which in general will increase the effectiveness of surgical treatment of congenital glaucoma in children. 54 children (91 eyes) with simple congenital glaucoma at the age of 1 to 36 months were operated on average (8.7 ± 8.2) months. The persistent and long-lasting hypotensive effect achieved due to viscosinusotrabeculotomy in children with developed and far-advanced stages of congenital glaucoma stops the processes of stretching of the membranes of the eye and stabilizes their size, which in general allows preserving and visual functions improving, in infancy – creating conditions for their formation.

ANALYSIS OF ACCOMPANYING PATHOLOGIES IN WOMEN WITH VARIOUS DISORDERS OF THE MENSTRUAL CYCLE

2020 ◽  
pp. 33-43
Author(s):  
Ольга Александровна Судакова ◽  
Михаил Вадимович Фролов ◽  
Алина Сергеевна Позднякова ◽  
Евгений Владимирович Белов ◽  
Данаил Красимирович Назлиев
Keyword(s):  
Antenatal Clinic ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
General Will ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
Depth Analysis ◽  
Menstrual Irregularities ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Female Genital ◽  
Number Of Authors

Статья посвящена изучению сопутствующей патологии, у женщин репродуктивного возраста, обращающихся в стационар с жалобами на нарушения менструального цикла (НМЦ). Актуальность данной тематики не вызывает сомнения, так как с каждым годом в России и во всем мире регистрируется все большее количество случаев НМЦ. По мнению ряда авторов, данные нарушения могут составлять до 50% всех патологий женской половой сферы. Большой интерес представляет и изучение ряда сопутствующих заболеваний, которые могут отягощать течение НМЦ или наоборот, приводить к их развитию. Целью работы стал анализ разнообразной сопутствующей патологии при НМЦ, с выявлением основных причин нарушений менструального цикла у женщин фертильного возраста. Объектами исследования стали 300 пациенток, с диагнозом НМЦ, которые были разделены на 3 группы, в зависимости от уровня лечебного учреждения, где они проходили обследование - по 100 пациенток: проходивших обследование в больнице скорой медицинской помощи, обследующиеся в женской консультации и проходящие лечение сопутствующей онкопатологии в областном онкологическом диспансере. В дальнейшем проводилась дополнительное деление в каждой группе на 2 подгруппы, в зависимости от того был ли НМЦ впервые выявленным или повторно выявленным. В самой работе проводился подробный анализ сопутствующей патологии у женщин в зависимости от группы и их возраста. Определялись не только «пораженные» системы органов, но и проводился углубленный анализ по нозологиям. Работа интересна еще и тем, что в ней у всех пациенток на протяжении исследования определялся уровень стресса и наличие возможных депрессивных состояний. Определение наиболее вероятных причин НМЦ стало завершающим этапом исследования. Полученные данные могут приблизить практикующих акушеров-гинекологов к более полному пониманию различных нарушений менструального цикла, что в целом, положительно скажется на качестве и эффективности оказываемой медицинской помощи The article is devoted to the study of concomitant pathology in women of reproductive age who go to the hospital with complaints of menstrual irregularities (NMC). The relevance of this topic is beyond doubt, since every year in Russia and around the world an increasing number of cases of NMC are registered. According to a number of authors, these violations can account for up to 50% of all pathologies of the female genital area. Of great interest is the study of a number of concomitant diseases that can aggravate the course of NMC or, conversely, lead to their development. The aim of the work was to analyze a variety of concomitant pathologies in NMC, with the identification of the main causes of menstrual irregularities in women of fertile age. The objects of the study were 300 patients diagnosed with NMC, who were divided into 3 groups, depending on the level of the medical institution where they were examined - 100 patients each: who were examined in an emergency hospital, examined in an antenatal clinic and undergoing treatment for concomitant oncopathology in the regional oncological dispensary. Subsequently, an additional division was carried out in each group into 2 subgroups, depending on whether the NMC was newly detected or re-identified. In the work itself, a detailed analysis of comorbidities in women was carried out, depending on the group and their age. Not only the "affected" organ systems were identified, but an in-depth analysis of nosologies was also carried out. The work is also interesting in that during the study the level of stress and the presence of possible depressive states were determined in all patients. Determination of the most probable causes of NMC was the final stage of the study. The data obtained can bring practicing obstetricians and gynecologists closer to a more complete understanding of various menstrual irregularities, which, in general, will have a positive effect on the quality and effectiveness of medical care

Proroguing the Parliament of Australia: The Effect on the Senate and the Conventions that Constrain the Prerogative Power

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-88
Author(s):  
Eliot Olivier
Keyword(s):  
Prime Minister ◽  
New South ◽  
New South Wales ◽  
Balance Of Power ◽  
Public Attention ◽  
General Will ◽  
Real Possibility ◽  
Political Landscape ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Constitutional System

Political controversies in New South Wales and Canada recently have focused public attention on the constitutional practice of proroguing parliament. They have also shone a light on two lingering areas of uncertainty that surround its operation under the Commonwealth Constitution. This article seeks to clarify these two muddy areas of the law concerning prorogation. The first is the effect of prorogation on the Senate and its committees. Since Federation, the Senate has purported to authorise its committees to continue to function notwithstanding a prorogation of the Parliament. However, it is argued that this practice is unsupported by the provisions of the Constitution and the Senate has no such power. Second, the article examines the operation of the conventions that constrain the Governor-General's power to prorogue. Prorogation generally is exercised on the advice of the Prime Minister. However, this article contends that where a Prime Minister seeks to prorogue Parliament to avoid a vote of no confidence, the Governor-General will have a discretion to reject the advice. It may also be open to the Governor-General to reject an advice to prorogue where the purpose is to avoid scrutiny of a fundamental constitutional illegality. In Australia, the uncertainties that surround prorogation, coupled with the now precarious political landscape in Canberra, create the very real possibility of a prorogation crisis at the Commonwealth level. This article provides a response to these uncertainties. In doing so it offers a solution to how a prorogation crisis can be resolved, whilst maintaining the fine balance of power in our constitutional system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document