Magnetic remanence in the Chalk of eastern England: an unusually resistant VRM?

1994 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. 593-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham J. Borradaile
Keyword(s):  
Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Natural Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Single Component ◽  
Magnetic Minerals ◽  
Magnetic Remanence ◽  
Ferro Magnetic

AbstractA single component, natural remanent magnetization (NRM) is carried largely by pseudosingle domain magnetite in the Cretaceous Lower Chalk and Red Chalk of eastern England. The Red Chalk also records the same direction in haematite. Most of the ferro-magnetic minerals occur as primary clastic or early diagenetic grains. A stable remanence component is resistant to demagnetization, and is carried by both magnetite and haematite. Nevertheless, it has a steep inclination close to the present Earth's field and it is too steep for the previously reported palaeolatitude of these rocks at the time of sedimentation. A postglacial slump breccia scatters the ChRM but also provides some evidence of viscous, partial magnetic overprinting during slumping. Despite its resistance to thermal and alternating field demagnetization the characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM) is probably a young Bruhnes epoch viscous remanent remagnetization (VRM).

Under pressure: How pressure affects magnetic remanence

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Volk ◽  
Roger Fu ◽  
Josh Feinberg
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Magnetic Domain ◽  
Natural Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Magnetic Minerals ◽  
Magnetic Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Remanence ◽  
Series Of Experiments

<p>Rocks have complicated histories and form under various conditions. However, all rocks, terrestrial and extraterrestrial, have been subjected to some form of pressure during their genesis. The effect of pressure (strain) on the magnetic remanence is a largely unexplored problem, with most of the work being focused on the study of meteorites. </p><p>In the absence of a magnetic field, subjecting a rock to pressure can demagnetize the natural remanent magnetization (NRM). This loss of magnetic remanence can lead to an underestimation of paleointensities. On the other hand, in the presence of a magnetic field, magnetic minerals can record a pressure remanent magnetization (PRM). The superposition of the remaining NRM and a newly acquired PRM can influence the remanence direction as well as the paleointensity. Since the reconstruction of the temporal changes of Earths’ magnetic relies on robust estimations of direction and intensity, the effects of pressure on the remanence should be taken into account.</p><p>Here we present a series of experiments that aim to explore the acquisition process of PRMs and their net contribution with respect to the rock’s original magnetization. Stoichiometric magnetites of four different grain sizes (65 nm, 440 nm, 16.9 µm, and 18.3 µm) and magnetic domain states were subjected to crustal pressures (226, 301, and 376 MPa) in the presence of a magnetic field. Surprisingly, the PRM intensity showed no detectable dependence on grain size. However, because the acquisition of a thermal remanence (TRM) is strongly dependent on particle size,  populations of large multidomain particles can acquire a PRM, which may represent up to 30% of a TRM acquired in the same field.</p><p>Finally, we will show how the influence of pressure on the magnetic remanence can be visualized by modern magnetic imaging techniques like the quantum diamond microscope (QDM). The QDM has a  ~1 µm maximum spatial resolution that is able to resolve the magnetic fields of individual mineral assemblages with ~10 µm diameter. The high spatial resolution and sensitivity enables us to visualize the changes in magnetic remanence due to pressure cycling and can help to better understand the possible implications for paleomagnetism.</p>

scholarly journals Magnetic Mineralogy of Speleothems From Tropical-Subtropical Sites of South America

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Plinio Jaqueto ◽  
Ricardo I. F. Trindade ◽  
Joshua M. Feinberg ◽  
Janine Carmo ◽  
Valdir F. Novello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Properties ◽  
South America ◽  
Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Drainage Basin ◽  
Environmental Magnetism ◽  
Rank Correlation ◽  
Natural Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Magnetic Minerals ◽  
Magnetic Mineralogy ◽  
Diverse Range

Fe-bearing minerals are a tiny fraction of the composition of speleothems. They have their origin in the karst system or are transported from the drainage basin into the cave. Recent studies on the magnetism of speleothems focused on the variations of their magnetic mineralogy in specific time intervals and are usually limited to a single sample. In this study, we describe a database of environmental magnetism parameters built from 22 stalagmites from different caves located in Brazil (South America) at different latitudes, comprising different climates and biomes. The magnetic signal observed in these stalagmites is dominated by low-coercivity minerals (∼20 mT) whose magnetic properties resemble those of the magnetite formed in pedogenic environments. Also, a comparison with few samples from soils and the carbonate from cave’s walls shows a good agreement of the magnetic properties of speleothems with those of soil samples, reinforcing previous suggestions that in (sub-)tropical regimes, the dominant magnetic phase in speleothems is associated with the soil above the cave. Spearman’s rank correlation points to a positive strong correlation between magnetic concentration parameters (mass-normalized magnetic susceptibility, natural remanent magnetization, anhysteretic remanent magnetization, and isothermal remanent magnetization). This implies that ultrafine ferrimagnetic minerals are the dominant phase in these (sub-)tropical karst systems, which extend across a diverse range of biomes. Although the samples are concentrated in the savannah biome (Cerrado) (∼70%), comparison with other biomes shows a higher concentration of magnetic minerals in speleothem underlying savannahs and lower concentration in those underlying moist broadleaf forests (Atlantic and Amazon biome) and dry forests (Caatinga). Thus, rainfall, biome, and epikarst dynamics play an important role in the concentration of magnetic minerals in speleothems in (sub-)tropical sites and indicate they can be an important target for paleoenvironmental research in cave systems.

scholarly journals On the Primordial Condensation and Accretion Environment and the Remanent Magnetization of Meteorites

1971 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 311-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aviva Brecher
Keyword(s):  
Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Rock Magnetism ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Natural Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Parent Body ◽  
Origin And Evolution ◽  
Consistent Model ◽  
Magnetic Remanence ◽  
Condensation Growth ◽  
Theoretical Results

Attention is drawn to the fact that neither astronomical observations, nor laboratory data can, as yet, sufficiently constrain models of the origin and evolution of the solar system. But, if correctly approached and interpreted, the magnetic remanence of meteorites could help in constructing a self-consistent model.In the context of various models for the early evolution of a solar nebula, the possible roles assigned to ambient magnetic fields and the paleointensities required to establish the stable natural remanent magnetization (NRM in range 10-4 to 10-1 cgsm) observed in meteorites, are discussed. It is suggested that the record of paleofields present during condensation, growth, and accumulation of grains is likely to have been preserved as chemical (CRM) or thermochemical (TCRM) remanence in unaltered meteoritic material. This interpretation of the meteoritic NRM is made plausible by experimental and theoretical results from the contiguous fields of rock magnetism, magnetic materials, interstellar grains, etc. Several arguments (such as the anisotropy of susceptibility in chondrites, suggesting alignment of elongated ferromagnetic grains, or the characteristic sizes and morphology of carrier phases of remanence, etc.) as well as general evidence from meteoritics (cooling rates, chemical and mineralogical data) can be used to challenge the interpretation of NRM as thermo-remanence (TRM) acquired on a “planetary” parent body during cooling of magnetic mineral phases through the Curie point in fields of 0.2 to 0.9 Oe.Fine-particle theories appear adequate for treating meteoritic remanence, if models based on corresponding types of permanent magnet materials, e.g., powder-ferrites for chondrites; diffusion hardened alloys for iron meteorites, are adopted, as suggested here.Finally, a potentially fruitful sequence of experiments is suggested for separating the useful component of NRM in determining the paleofield intensity and its time evolution.

scholarly journals Upper Devonian (Frasnian stage) of the north-western part of the Russian Platform: paleomagnetic data

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.G. Iosifidi ◽  
◽  
V.V. Popov ◽  
A.V. Zhuravlev ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Natural Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Upper Devonian ◽  
Paleomagnetic Data ◽  
Magnetic Minerals ◽  
The North ◽  
Apparent Polar Wander Path ◽  
Paleomagnetic Pole ◽  
Frasnian Stage ◽  
Main Devonian Field

Paleomagnetic determinations for the Devonian strata of the Main Devonian Field, available in the international paleomagnetic data base, do not make it possible to construct both detailed magnetostratigraphic scales and reliable trajectories of the apparent polar wander path of the paleomagnetic pole. This is primarily due to the insufficient amount of data that determine modern reliability criteria. Obtaining more complete series of reliable paleomagnetic determinations is one of the important tasks of paleomagnetic studies. The paper presents new paleomagnetic determinations from a collection of rocks of the Frasnian stage of the Upper Devonian (Ilmen and Bureg Beds of the Semiluky Formation), sampled on the southern shore of Lake Ilmen, east of the village. Korostyn in 2009. Magnetomineralogical studies were carried out to determine the magnetic minerals of carriers of natural remanent magnetization. Three characteristic components of natural remanent magnetization have been identified. Two components correspond to the Late Paleozoic magnetization reversal (in the Carboniferous and Permian times). The third, bipolar component of the Frasnian age passes the reverse polarity test of the geomagnetic field.. The obtained position of the paleomagnetic pole by the bipolar component of the natural remanent magnetization is consistent with the available data on the section of the Late Upper Devonian of the Main Devonian Field.

scholarly journals Paleomagnetic secular variation for a 21,000-year sediment sequence from Cascade Lake, north-central Brooks Range, Arctic Alaska

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas P. Steen ◽  
Joseph S. Stoner ◽  
Jason P. Briner ◽  
Darrell S. Kaufman
Keyword(s):  
Secular Variation ◽  
Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Sediment Cores ◽  
Natural Remanent Magnetization ◽  
Companion Paper ◽  
Angular Deviation ◽  
Arctic Alaska ◽  
Geomagnetic Field Models ◽  
Paleomagnetic Secular Variation ◽  
Radiometric Ages

Abstract. Two > 5-m-long sediment cores from Cascade Lake (68.38° N, 154.60° W), Arctic Alaska, were analyzed to quantify their paleomagnetic properties over the past 21,000 years. Alternating-field demagnetization of the natural remanent magnetization, anhysteretic remanent magnetization, isothermal remanent magnetization, and hysteresis experiments reveal a strong, well-defined characteristic remanent magnetization carried by a low coercivity magnetic component that increases up core. Maximum angular deviation values average < 2°, and average inclination values are within 4° of the geocentric axial dipole prediction. Radiometric ages based on 210Pb and 14C were used to correlate the major inclination features of the resulting paleomagnetic secular variation (PSV) record with those of other regional PSV records, including two geomagnetic field models and the longer series from Burial Lake, located 200 km to the west. Following around 6 ka (cal BP), the ages of PSV fluctuations in Cascade Lake begin to diverge from those of the regional records, reaching a maximum offset of about 2000 years at around 4 ka. Several correlated cryptotephra ages from this section (reported in a companion paper by Davies et al., this volume) support the regional PSV-based chronology and indicate that some of the 14C ages at Cascade Lake are variably too old.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document