Effect of high hydrostatic pressure and whey proteins on the disruption of casein micelle isolates

2007 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 452-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico M Harte ◽  
Subba Rao Gurram ◽  
Lloyd O Luedecke ◽  
Barry G Swanson ◽  
Gustavo V Barbosa-Cánovas
Keyword(s):  
Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
Whey Protein ◽  
High Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
Analytical Ultracentrifugation ◽  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Casein Micelle ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Thermally Processed

High hydrostatic pressure disruption of casein micelle isolates was studied by analytical ultracentrifugation and transmission electron microscopy. Casein micelles were isolated from skim milk and subjected to combinations of thermal treatment (85°C, 20 min) and high hydrostatic pressure (up to 676 MPa) with and without whey protein added. High hydrostatic pressure promoted extensive disruption of the casein micelles in the 250 to 310 MPa pressure range. At pressures greater than 310 MPa no further disruption was observed. The addition of whey protein to casein micelle isolates protected the micelles from high hydrostatic pressure induced disruption only when the mix was thermally processed before pressure treatment. The more whey protein was added (up to 5 g/l) the more the protection against high hydrostatic pressure induced micelle disruption was observed in thermally treated samples subjected to 310 MPa.

Association of denatured whey proteins with casein micelles in heated reconstituted skim milk and its effect on casein micelle size

2003 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Skelte G Anema ◽  
Yuming Li
Keyword(s):  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Particle Size ◽  
Whey Protein ◽  
Volume Fraction ◽  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Casein Micelle ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Prolonged Heating ◽  
Micelle Size

When skim milk at pH 6·55 was heated (75 to 100 °C for up to 60 min), the casein micelle size, as monitored by photon correlation spectroscopy, was found to increase during the initial stages of heating and tended to plateau on prolonged heating. At any particular temperature, the casein micelle size increased with longer holding times, and, at any particular holding time, the casein micelle size increased with increasing temperature. The maximum increase in casein micelle size was about 30–35 nm. The changes in casein micelle size were poorly correlated with the level of whey protein denaturation. However, the changes in casein micelle size were highly correlated with the levels of denatured whey proteins that were associated with the casein micelles. The rate of association of the denatured whey proteins with the casein micelles was considerably slower than the rate of denaturation of the whey proteins. Removal of the whey proteins from the skim milk resulted in only small changes in casein micelle size during heating. Re-addition of β-lactoglobulin to the whey-protein-depleted milk caused the casein micelle size to increase markedly on heat treatment. The changes in casein micelle size induced by the heat treatment of skim milk may be a consequence of the whey proteins associating with the casein micelles. However, these associated whey proteins would need to occlude a large amount of serum to account for the particle size changes. Separate experiments showed that the viscosity changes of heated milk and the estimated volume fraction changes were consistent with the particle size changes observed. Further studies are needed to determine whether the changes in size are due to the specific association of whey proteins with the micelles or whether a low level of aggregation of the casein micelles accompanies this association behaviour. Preliminary studies indicated lower levels of denatured whey proteins associated with the casein micelles and smaller changes in casein micelle size occurred as the pH of the milk was increased from pH 6·5 to pH 6·7.

Heat stability of milk: pH-dependent dissociation of micellar κ-casein on heating milk at ultra high temperatures

1985 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harjinder Singh ◽  
Partick F. Fox
Keyword(s):  
Whey Protein ◽  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Heat Stability ◽  
Casein Micelle ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Ph Profile ◽  
Ph Values ◽  
Maximum Stability ◽  
Β Lactoglobulin ◽  
Maximum Minimum

SUMMARYPreheating milk at 140 °C for 1 min at pH 6·6, 6·8, 7·0 or 7·2 shifted the heat coagulation time (HCT)/pH profile to acidic values without significantly affecting the maximum stability. Whey proteins (both β-lactoglobulin and α-lactalbumin) co-sedimented with the casein micelles after heating milk at pH < 6·9 and the whey protein-coated micelles, dispersed in milk ultrafiltrate, showed characteristic maxima–minima in their HCT/pH profile. Heating milk at higher pH values (> 6·9) resulted in the dissociation of whey proteins and κ-casein-rich protein from the micelles and the residual micelles were unstable, without a maximum–minimum in the HCT/pH profile. Preformed whey protein–casein micelle complexes formed by preheating (140 °C for 1 min) milk at pH 6·7 dissociated from the micelles on reheating (140 °C for 1 min) at pH > 6·9. The dissociation of micellar-κ-casein, perhaps complexed with whey proteins, may reduce the micellar zeta potential at pH ≃ 6·9 sufficiently to cause a minimum in the HCT/pH profile of milk.

High-pressure treatment of milk: effects on casein micelle structure and on enzymic coagulation

2000 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
ERIC C. NEEDS ◽  
ROBERT A. STENNING ◽  
ALISON L. GILL ◽  
VICTORIA FERRAGUT ◽  
GILLIAN T. RICH
Keyword(s):  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Casein Micelle ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Dense Networks ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Micelle Structure ◽  
Milk Casein ◽  
Β Lactoglobulin ◽  
Gel Network

High isostatic pressures up to 600 MPa were applied to samples of skim milk before addition of rennet and preparation of cheese curds. Electron microscopy revealed the structure of rennet gels produced from pressure-treated milks. These contained dense networks of fine strands, which were continuous over much bigger distances than in gels produced from untreated milk, where the strands were coarser with large interstitial spaces. Alterations in gel network structure gave rise to differences in rheology with much higher values for the storage moduli in the pressure-treated milk gels. The rate of gel formation and the water retention within the gel matrix were also affected by the processing of the milk. Casein micelles were disrupted by pressure and disruption appeared to be complete at treatments of 400 MPa and above. Whey proteins, particularly β-lactoglobulin, were progressively denatured as increasing pressure was applied, and the denatured β-lactoglobulin was incorporated into the rennet gels. Pressure-treated micelles were coagulated rapidly by rennet, but the presence of denatured β-lactoglobulin interfered with the secondary aggregation phase and reduced the overall rate of coagulation. Syneresis from the curds was significantly reduced following treatment of the milk at 600 MPa, probably owing to the effects of a finer gel network and increased inclusion of whey protein. Levels of syneresis were more similar to control samples when the milk was treated at 400 MPa or less.

Heat stability of milk: further studies on the pH-dependent dissociation of micellar κ-casein

1986 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harjinder Singh ◽  
Patrick F. Fox
Keyword(s):  
Whey Protein ◽  
Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide ◽  
Opposite Effect ◽  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Sodium Dodecyl ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Heat Stability ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Acetylneuraminic Acid ◽  
Ph Dependent

SUMMARYWhey protein complexed and became co-sedimentable with casein micelles after heating milk at ≥ 90°C for 10 min at pH ≤ 6·9 while at higher pH values (7·3) whey proteins and κ-casein-rich protein dissociated from the micelles on heating. κ-Casein-deficient micelles were more sensitive to heat, Ca2+ or ethanol than whey protein-coated or native micelles and were readily coagulable by rennet. Isolated κ-casein added to skim milk before preheating (90°C for 10 min) did not associate with the micelles at pH ≥ 6·9. Sodium dodecyl sulphate increased the level of both non-sedimentable N (NSN) and N-acetylneuraminic acid (NANA) and shifted the NSN-pH and NANA-pH curves to more acidic values while cetyltrimethylammonium bromide had the opposite effect. It is suggested that the pH-dependent dissociation in micellar κ-casein, which appears to be reversible, depends on the surface charge on the micelles; at a certain negative charge, disruption of hydrophobic and electrostatic forces could result in the dissociation of κ-casein from the casein micelles.

Gelation of casein-whey mixtures: effects of heating whey proteins alone or in the presence of casein micelles

2001 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
CATHERINE SCHORSCH ◽  
DEBORAH K. WILKINS ◽  
MALCOLM G. JONES ◽  
IAN T. NORTON
Keyword(s):  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Whey Protein ◽  
Protein Denaturation ◽  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Treatment Sequence ◽  
Gel Properties ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Gelation Kinetics ◽  
Milk Gelation

The aim of the present work was to investigate the role of whey protein denaturation on the acid induced gelation of casein. This was studied by determining the effect of whey protein denaturation both in the presence and absence of casein micelles. The study showed that milk gelation kinetics and gel properties are greatly influenced by the heat treatment sequence. When the whey proteins are denatured separately and subsequently added to casein micelles, acid-induced gelation occurs more rapidly and leads to gels with a more particulated microstructure than gels made from co-heated systems. The gels resulting from heat-treatment of a mixture of pre-denatured whey protein with casein micelles are heterogeneous in nature due to particulates formed from casein micelles which are complexed with denatured whey proteins and also from separate whey protein aggregates. Whey proteins thus offer an opportunity not only to control casein gelation but also to control the level of syneresis, which can occur.

Changes in milk on heating: viscosity measurements

1993 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theo J. M. Jeurnink ◽  
Kees G. De Kruif
Keyword(s):  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Hard Spheres ◽  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Quantitative Model ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Mutual Attraction ◽  
Viscosity Measurements ◽  
Quantitative Basis

SummarySkim milk was heated at 85 °C for different holding times. As a result of such heating, whey proteins, in particular β-lactoglobulin, denatured and associated with casein micelles. This led to an increase in size of the casein micelles but also to a different interaction between them. Both these changes could be described by using a quantitative model which was developed for the viscosity of so-called adhesive hard spheres. We applied the model successfully to skim milk and were able to describe on a quantitative basis the changes due to the heat treatment of milk. It was shown that after heating the casein micelles became larger and acquired a mutual attraction. The unfolding of the whey proteins and their subsequent association with the casein micelles appeared to be responsible for these changes. How this reaction influences the fouling of heat exchangers is discussed.

Changes in Size of Casein Micelles Caused by Growth of Psychrotrophic Bacteria in Raw Skim Milk

1984 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
JONATHAN P. BURLINGAME-FREY ◽  
ELMER H. MARTH
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscopy ◽  
Skim Milk ◽  
Bacterial Activity ◽  
Casein Micelles ◽  
Psychrotrophic Bacteria ◽  
Ph Values ◽  
Psychrotrophic Bacterium ◽  
Transmission Electron

Raw skim milk was inoculated (1%, v/v) with a proteolytic psychrotrophic bacterium that previously was isolated from milk. The inoculated skim milk was incubated at 7°C for 0, 3, 5 and 7 d. The pH values for the milk were 6.6, 6.5, 6.45 and 5.95, and the numbers of psychrotrophs/ml were 1.0 × 104 8.9 × 107, 9.0 × 108 and 2.5 × 108 for days 0, 3, 5 and 7, respectively. Samples of milk were negatively stained, examined with transmission electron microscopy and distribution of sizes of casein micelles was determined. The average and (mode) sizes of micelles were 849 (789), 1030 (634), 761 (634) and 405 (316) Angstroms for milks after days 0, 3, 5 and 7, respectively. Another set of samples was prepared from skim milk immediately after it was acidified to pH values of 6.6, 6.5, 6.45 and 5.95. The average and (mode) sizes of micelles were 891 (766), 875 (615), 913 (766) and 840 (615) Angstroms for milks having pH values of 6.6, 6.5, 6.45 and 5.95, respectively. Changes in size of micelles in the incubated samples resulted from bacterial activity other than small changes in pH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document