On unified boundary conditions for improved predictions of near-wall turbulence

2010 ◽  
Vol 656 ◽  
pp. 530-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. JAKIRLIĆ ◽  
J. JOVANOVIĆ
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Viscous Sublayer ◽  
Wall Turbulence ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Homogeneous Part ◽  
Wall Distance ◽  
Wall Boundary Conditions ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Near Wall Turbulence ◽  
Near Wall

A novel formulation of the wall boundary conditions relying on the asymptotic behaviour of the Taylor microscale λ and its relationship to the homogeneous part of the viscous dissipation rate of the kinetic energy of turbulence εh=5νq2/λ2, applicable to near-wall turbulence, is examined. The linear dependence of λ on the wall distance in close proximity to the solid surface enables the wall-closest grid node to be positioned immediately below the edge of the viscous sublayer, leading to a substantial coarsening of the grid resolution. This approach provides bridging of a major portion of the viscous sublayer, higher grid flexibility and weaker sensitivity against the grid non-uniformities in the near-wall region. The performance of the proposed formulation was checked against available direct numerical simulation databases of complex wall-bounded flows featured by swirl and separation.

A revisit of the equilibrium assumption for predicting near-wall turbulence

2014 ◽  
Vol 760 ◽  
pp. 304-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid Karimpour ◽  
Subhas K. Venayagamoorthy
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulent Kinetic Energy ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Turbulent Viscosity ◽  
Wall Turbulence ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Turbulence Decay ◽  
Prime 2 ◽  
Near Wall Turbulence ◽  
Near Wall

AbstractIn this study, we revisit the consequence of assuming equilibrium between the rates of production ($P$) and dissipation $({\it\epsilon})$ of the turbulent kinetic energy $(k)$ in the highly anisotropic and inhomogeneous near-wall region. Analytical and dimensional arguments are made to determine the relevant scales inherent in the turbulent viscosity (${\it\nu}_{t}$) formulation of the standard $k{-}{\it\epsilon}$ model, which is one of the most widely used turbulence closure schemes. This turbulent viscosity formulation is developed by assuming equilibrium and use of the turbulent kinetic energy $(k)$ to infer the relevant velocity scale. We show that such turbulent viscosity formulations are not suitable for modelling near-wall turbulence. Furthermore, we use the turbulent viscosity $({\it\nu}_{t})$ formulation suggested by Durbin (Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., vol. 3, 1991, pp. 1–13) to highlight the appropriate scales that correctly capture the characteristic scales and behaviour of $P/{\it\epsilon}$ in the near-wall region. We also show that the anisotropic Reynolds stress ($\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}$) is correlated with the wall-normal, isotropic Reynolds stress ($\overline{v^{\prime 2}}$) as $-\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}=c_{{\it\mu}}^{\prime }(ST_{L})(\overline{v^{\prime 2}})$, where $S$ is the mean shear rate, $T_{L}=k/{\it\epsilon}$ is the turbulence (decay) time scale and $c_{{\it\mu}}^{\prime }$ is a universal constant. ‘A priori’ tests are performed to assess the validity of the propositions using the direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of unstratified channel flow of Hoyas & Jiménez (Phys. Fluids, vol. 18, 2006, 011702). The comparisons with the data are excellent and confirm our findings.

The autonomous cycle of near-wall turbulence

1999 ◽  
Vol 389 ◽  
pp. 335-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAVIER JIMÉNEZ ◽  
ALFREDO PINELLI
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Wall Turbulence ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Streamwise Vortices ◽  
Outer Flow ◽  
Turbulent Fluctuations ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Turbulence Generation ◽  
Near Wall Turbulence ◽  
Near Wall

Numerical experiments on modified turbulent channels at moderate Reynolds numbers are used to differentiate between several possible regeneration cycles for the turbulent fluctuations in wall-bounded flows. It is shown that a cycle exists which is local to the near-wall region and does not depend on the outer flow. It involves the formation of velocity streaks from the advection of the mean profile by streamwise vortices, and the generation of the vortices from the instability of the streaks. Interrupting any of those processes leads to laminarization. The presence of the wall seems to be only necessary to maintain the mean shear. The generation of secondary vorticity at the wall is shown to be of little importance in turbulence generation under natural circumstances. Inhibiting its production increases turbulence intensity and drag.

Some insights for the prediction of near-wall turbulence

2013 ◽  
Vol 723 ◽  
pp. 126-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid Karimpour ◽  
Subhas K. Venayagamoorthy
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Time Scale ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Wall Turbulence ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Velocity Scale ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Near Wall Turbulence ◽  
Near Wall

AbstractIn this paper, we revisit the eddy viscosity formulation to highlight a number of important issues that have direct implications for the prediction of near-wall turbulence. For steady wall-bounded turbulent flows, we make the equilibrium assumption between rates of production ($P$) and dissipation ($\epsilon $) of turbulent kinetic energy ($k$) in the near-wall region to propose that the eddy viscosity should be given by ${\nu }_{t} \approx \epsilon / {S}^{2} $, where $S$ is the mean shear rate. We then argue that the appropriate velocity scale is given by $\mathop{(S{T}_{L} )}\nolimits ^{- 1/ 2} {k}^{1/ 2} $ where ${T}_{L} = k/ \epsilon $ is the turbulence (decay) time scale. The difference between this velocity scale and the commonly assumed velocity scale of ${k}^{1/ 2} $ is subtle but the consequences are significant for near-wall effects. We then extend our discussion to show that the fundamental length and time scales that capture the near-wall behaviour in wall-bounded shear flows are the shear mixing length scale ${L}_{S} = \mathop{(\epsilon / {S}^{3} )}\nolimits ^{1/ 2} $ and the mean shear time scale $1/ S$, respectively. With these appropriate length and time scales (or equivalently velocity and time scales), the eddy viscosity can be rewritten in the familiar form of the $k$–$\epsilon $ model as ${\nu }_{t} = \mathop{(1/ S{T}_{L} )}\nolimits ^{2} {k}^{2} / \epsilon $. We use the direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of turbulent channel flow of Hoyas & Jiménez (Phys. Fluids, vol. 18, 2006, 011702) and the turbulent boundary layer flow of Jiménez et al. (J. Fluid Mech. vol. 657, 2010, pp. 335–360) to perform ‘a priori’ tests to check the validity of the revised eddy viscosity formulation. The comparisons with the exact computations from the DNS data are remarkable and highlight how well the equilibrium assumption holds in the near-wall region. These findings could prove to be useful in near-wall modelling of turbulent flows.

The effect of wall-normal gravity on particle-laden near-wall turbulence

2019 ◽  
Vol 873 ◽  
pp. 475-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junghoon Lee ◽  
Changhoon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Channel Flow ◽  
Viscous Sublayer ◽  
Stokes Number ◽  
Wall Turbulence ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Gravitational Acceleration ◽  
Lower Wall ◽  
Low Speed ◽  
Near Wall Turbulence ◽  
Near Wall

We performed two-way coupled direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flow with Lagrangian tracking of small, heavy spheres at a dimensionless gravitational acceleration of 0.077 in wall units, which is based on the flow condition in the experiment by Gerashchenko et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 617, 2008, pp. 255–281). We removed deposited particles after several collisions with the lower wall and then released new particles near the upper wall to observe direct interactions between particles and coherent structures of near-wall turbulence during gravitational settling through the mean shear. The results indicate that when the Stokes number is approximately 1 on the basis of the Kolmogorov time scale of the flow ($St_{K}\approx 1$), the so-called preferential sweeping occurs in association with coherent streamwise vortices, while the effect of crossing trajectories becomes significant for $St_{K}>1$. Consequently, in either case, the settling particles deposit on the wall without strong accumulation in low-speed streaks in the viscous sublayer. When particles settle through near-wall turbulence from the upper wall, more small-scale vortical structures are generated in the outer layer as low-speed fluid is pulled farther in the direction of gravity, while the opposite is true near the lower wall.

On the departure of near-wall turbulence from the quasi-steady state

2019 ◽  
Vol 871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Agostini ◽  
Michael Leschziner
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Outer Part ◽  
Viscous Sublayer ◽  
Wall Turbulence ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Scale Production ◽  
Scale Turbulence ◽  
Near Wall Turbulence ◽  
Near Wall

An examination is undertaken of the validity and limitations of the quasi-steady hypothesis of near-wall turbulence. This hypothesis is based on the supposition that the statistics of the turbulent fluctuations are universal if scaled by the local, instantaneous, wall shear when its variations are determined from footprints of large-scale, energetic, structures that reside in the outer part of the logarithmic layer. The examination is performed with the aid of direct numerical simulation data for a single Reynolds number, which are processed in a manner that brings out the variability of locally scaled statistics when conditioned on the local value of the wall friction. The key question is to what extent this variability is insignificant, thus reflecting universality. It is shown that the validity of the quasi-steady hypothesis is confined, at best, to a thin layer above the viscous sublayer. Beyond this layer, substantial variations in the conditioned shear-induced production rate of large-scale turbulence cause substantial departures from the hypothesis. Even within the wall-proximate layer, moderate departures are provoked by large-scale distortions in the conditioned strain rate that result in variations in small-scale production of turbulence down to the viscous sublayer.

Shear stress-driven flow: the state space of near-wall turbulence as

2019 ◽  
Vol 874 ◽  
pp. 606-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Doohan ◽  
Ashley P. Willis ◽  
Yongyun Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Couette Flow ◽  
Poiseuille Flow ◽  
Wall Turbulence ◽  
Phase Portraits ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Velocity Statistics ◽  
Near Wall Turbulence ◽  
Near Wall

An inner-scaled, shear stress-driven flow is considered as a model of independent near-wall turbulence as the friction Reynolds number $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}\rightarrow \infty$. In this limit, the model is applicable to the near-wall region and the lower part of the logarithmic layer of various parallel shear flows, including turbulent Couette flow, Poiseuille flow and Hagen–Poiseuille flow. The model is validated against damped Couette flow and there is excellent agreement between the velocity statistics and spectra for the wall-normal height $y^{+}<40$. A near-wall flow domain of similar size to the minimal unit is analysed from a dynamical systems perspective. The edge and fifteen invariant solutions are computed, the first discovered for this flow configuration. Through continuation in the spanwise width $L_{z}^{+}$, the bifurcation behaviour of the solutions over the domain size is investigated. The physical properties of the solutions are explored through phase portraits, including the energy input and dissipation plane, and streak, roll and wave energy space. Finally, a Reynolds number is defined in outer units and the high-$Re$ asymptotic behaviour of the equilibria is studied. Three lower branch solutions are found to scale consistently with vortex–wave interaction (VWI) theory, with wave forcing localising around the critical layer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document