scholarly journals Manifolds which do not Admit Anosov Diffeomorphisms

1973 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 111-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Shiraiwa

In [3], M. W. Hirsch obtained some necessary conditions for the existence of an Anosov diffeomorphism on a differentiable manifold. As an application, he constructed many manifolds which do not admit Anosov diffeomorphisms.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Jiang ◽  
Ya B. Pesin ◽  
R. de la Llave

AbstractWe study the integrability of intermediate distributions for Anosov diffeomorphisms and provide an example of a C∞-Anosov diffeomorphism on a three-dimensional torus whose intermediate stable foliation has leaves that admit only a finite number of derivatives. We also show that this phenomenon is quite abundant. In dimension four or higher this can happen even if the Lyapunov exponents at periodic orbits are constant.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
JORGE GROISMAN ◽  
ZBIGNIEW NITECKI

Abstract A diffeomorphism of theplane is Anosov if it has a hyperbolic splitting at every point of the plane. In addition to linear hyperbolic automorphisms, translations of the plane also carry an Anosov structure (the existence of Anosov structures for plane translations was originally shown by White). Mendes conjectured that these are the only topological conjugacy classes for Anosov diffeomorphisms in the plane. Very recently, Matsumoto gave an example of an Anosov diffeomorphism of the plane, which is a Brouwer translation but not topologically conjugate to a translation, disproving Mendes’ conjecture. In this paper we prove that Mendes’ claim holds when the Anosov diffeomorphism is the time-one map of a flow, via a theorem about foliations invariant under a time-one map. In particular, this shows that the kind of counterexample constructed by Matsumoto cannot be obtained from a flow on the plane.


1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Flaminio ◽  
A. Katok

AbstractWe show that any symplectic Anosov diffeomorphism of a four torus T4 with sufficiently smooth stable and unstable foliations is smoothly conjugate to a linear hyperbolic automorphism of T4.


2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 441-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREY GOGOLEV

AbstractWe show by means of a counterexample that a C1+Lip diffeomorphism Hölder conjugate to an Anosov diffeomorphism is not necessarily Anosov. Also we include a result from the 2006 PhD thesis of Fisher: a C1+Lip diffeomorphism Hölder conjugate to an Anosov diffeomorphism is Anosov itself provided that Hölder exponents of the conjugacy and its inverse are sufficiently large.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
GIOVANNI FORNI

Abstract We prove that the asymptotics of ergodic integrals along an invariant foliation of a toral Anosov diffeomorphism, or of a pseudo-Anosov diffeomorphism on a compact orientable surface of higher genus, is determined (up to a logarithmic error) by the action of the diffeomorphism on the cohomology of the surface. As a consequence of our argument and of the results of Giulietti and Liverani [Parabolic dynamics and anisotropic Banach spaces. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)21(9) (2019), 2793–2858] on horospherical averages, toral Anosov diffeomorphisms have no Ruelle resonances in the open interval $(1, e^{h_{\mathrm {top}}})$ .


1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Carvalho

AbstractThis paper is about the existence of transitive non-hyperbolic attractors with corresponding SRB measures for arcs of diffeomorphisms crossing the boundary of the Axiom A systems, obtained through an elementary generic bifurcation (Hopf, saddle-node or flip) on a transitive Anosov diffeomorphism or an attracting basic set.


Author(s):  
František Čapka

AbstractThis study focuses on the process of the gradual shaping of Czech national awareness in Moravia from the beginning of the nineteenth century onwards when the necessary conditions for the development of improved mutual relations between the Czech (Slavic) population in the two Lands of the Czech Crown -Bohemia and Moravia - were slowly being formed. Moravia faced a number of handicaps to the development of a national revival in comparison with Bohemia, the most significant of which was the relatively high degree of Germanisation of the land. A change to the image of Moravia came in the revolutionary years 1848/1849, when Czech national awareness spread to broader sections of society in Moravia. The view of Bohemia held by the Moravians underwent significant change and a period of increasingly intensive political and cultural contact between the two lands arose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document